| Literature DB >> 24857938 |
Johannes Keller1, Bernardo F Sánchez-Dalmau1, Pablo Villoslada1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Retrograde trans-synaptic degeneration of retinal ganglion cell layer (GCL) has been proposed as one of the mechanisms contributing to permanent disability after visual pathway damage. We set out to test this mechanism taking advantage of the new methods for imaging the macula with high resolution by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with lesions in the posterior visual pathway. Additionally, we explored the association between thinning of GCL as an imaging marker of visual impairment such as visual field defects.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24857938 PMCID: PMC4032251 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical features of patients with visual field defects secondary to retro-geniculate visual pathway lesions.
| Case | Age | Sex | Site of lesion | Side | Type of lesion | Evolution (years) | Thinnest ipsilateral segment |
| 1 | 49 | M | Occipital cortex | Left | Intraparenchymal bleed | 2.7 | Infero-temporal |
| 2 | 25 | F | Occipital cortex | Left | Toxoplasma encephalitis | 6.7 | Infero-temporal |
| 3 | 18 | M | Occipital cortex | Left | Intraparenchymal bleed | 9.8 | Infero-temporal |
| 4 | 68 | M | Occipital cortex | Left | Ischaemic stroke | 3.9 | Supero-temporal |
| 5 | 21 | M | Occipital cortex | Right | Intraparenchymal bleed | 7.1 | Infero-temporal |
| 6 | 54 | M | Internal capsule | Right | Intraparenchymal bleed | 5.8 | Supero-temporal |
| 7 | 65 | M | Occipital cortex | Right | Post surgical excision | 2.6 | Supero-temporal |
| 8 | 21 | M | Occipital cortex | Right | Post surgical excision | 1.4 | Infero-temporal |
Figure 1VF greyscale plot (A, B), RGC and RNFL thickness (C, D) of patient 3 (A, C) and patient 6 (B, D).
* Sample correlated OCT segments with corresponding VF quadrant.
Correlation coefficients between the GCL and RNFL thickness and the VF deviation in corresponding quadrants.
| VF – RGC layer | VF – NRFL | |||
| VF segment | r | p | r | p |
|
| 0.491 | <0.05 | 0.575 | 0.02 |
|
| 0.712 | 0.002 | 0.605 | 0.013 |
|
| 0.708 | 0.002 | 0.546 | 0.029 |
|
| 0.661 | 0.005 | 0.243 | 0.365 |
Figure 2Scatterplot showing dispersion and linear regression of quadrant PD depression vs GCL thickness in the right (A) and left (B) eyes of all patients.
PD depression vs RNFL thickness is shown for the right (C) and left (D) eyes.