Literature DB >> 24853146

Deblurring algorithms accounting for the finite detector size in photoacoustic tomography.

Heinz Roitner1, Markus Haltmeier2, Robert Nuster3, Dianne P O'Leary4, Thomas Berer1, Guenther Paltauf3, Hubert Grün1, Peter Burgholzer1.   

Abstract

Most reconstruction algorithms for photoacoustic tomography, like back projection or time reversal, work ideally for point-like detectors. For real detectors, which integrate the pressure over their finite size, images reconstructed by these algorithms show some blurring. Iterative reconstruction algorithms using an imaging matrix can take the finite size of real detectors directly into account, but the numerical effort is significantly higher compared to the use of direct algorithms. For spherical or cylindrical detection surfaces, the blurring caused by a finite detector size is proportional to the distance from the rotation center (spin blur) and is equal to the detector size at the detection surface. In this work, we apply deconvolution algorithms to reduce this type of blurring on simulated and on experimental data. Two particular deconvolution methods are compared, which both utilize the fact that a representation of the blurred image in polar coordinates decouples pixels at different radii from the rotation center. Experimental data have been obtained with a flat, rectangular piezoelectric detector measuring signals around a plastisol cylinder containing various small photoacoustic sources with variable distance from the center. Both simulated and experimental results demonstrate a nearly complete elimination of spin blur.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24853146     DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.5.056011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  5 in total

1.  All-optical photoacoustic projection imaging.

Authors:  Johannes Bauer-Marschallinger; Karoline Felbermayer; Thomas Berer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Image reconstruction for endoscopic photoacoustic tomography including effects of detector responses.

Authors:  Zheng Sun; Huifeng Sun
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Comparison of Piezoelectric and Optical Projection Imaging for Three-Dimensional In Vivo Photoacoustic Tomography.

Authors:  Robert Nuster; Günther Paltauf
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2019-01-11

4.  Back-projection algorithm in generalized form for circular-scanning-based photoacoustic tomography with improved tangential resolution.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Tianning Su; Weiran Pang; Ningning Wei; Jiaying Xiao; Kuan Peng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-03

5.  Spatial weight matrix in dimensionality reduction reconstruction for micro-electromechanical system-based photoacoustic microscopy.

Authors:  Yuanzheng Ma; Chang Lu; Kedi Xiong; Wuyu Zhang; Sihua Yang
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2020-09-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.