| Literature DB >> 24851862 |
M Virginia Sanchez-Puerta1, Cinthia Carolina Abbona2.
Abstract
The tribe Hyoscyameae (Solanaceae) is restricted to Eurasia and includes the genera Archihyoscyamus, Anisodus, Atropa, Atropanthe, Hyoscyamus, Physochlaina, Przewalskia and Scopolia. Even though the monophyly of Hyoscyameae is strongly supported, the relationships of the taxa within the tribe remain unclear. Chloroplast markers have been widely used to elucidate plant relationships at low taxonomic levels. Identification of variable chloroplast intergenic regions has been developed based on comparative genomics of chloroplast genomes, but these regions have a narrow phylogenetic utility. In this study, we present the chloroplast genome sequence of Hyoscyamus niger and make comparisons to other solanaceous plastid genomes in terms of gene order, gene and intron content, editing sites, origins of replication, repeats, and hypothetical open reading frames. We developed and sequenced three variable plastid markers from eight species to elucidate relationships within the tribe Hyoscyameae. The presence of a horizontally transferred intron in the mitochondrial cox1 gene of some species of the tribe is considered here a likely synapomorphy uniting five genera of the Hyoscyameae. Alternatively, the cox1 intron could be a homoplasious character acquired twice within the tribe. A homoplasious inversion in the intergenic plastid spacer trnC-psbM was recognized as a source of bias and removed from the data set used in the phylogenetic analyses. Almost 12 kb of plastid sequence data were not sufficient to completely resolve relationships among genera of Hyoscyameae but some clades were identified. Two alternative hypotheses of the evolution of the genera within the tribe are proposed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24851862 PMCID: PMC4031233 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Chloroplast genome of Hyoscyamus niger.
Large and small single copy regions (LSC, SSC) and inverted repeats (IR) are indicated. Intron-containing genes are in bold face. Genes drawn inside and outside the circle are transcribed clockwise and counterclockwise, respectively. Genes belonging to different functional groups are marked with colors. Internal circle shows the %GC content across the cpDNA. A line is shown at GC content of 50%.
Genes identified in the chloroplast genome of Hyoscyamus niger.
| Photosynthesis-related | |
| Photosystem I |
|
| Photosystem II |
|
| Cytochrome b6f complex |
|
| NAD(P)H dehydrogenase |
|
| ATP synthase |
|
| Calvin cycle |
|
| Ribosomal proteins | |
| Large subunit |
|
| Small subunit |
|
| RNA polymerases |
|
| Others |
|
| Hypothetical proteins |
|
| ORFs |
|
| rRNAs |
|
| tRNAs |
|
Note: Bold face for intron-containing genes.
Editing sites in chloroplast genes of Solanaceae. Predicted editing sites in Hyoscyamus niger plastid genes and observed editing sites in Atropa belladonna and Nicotiana tabacum cpDNAs.
| Gene | Codon number |
|
|
| Codon in unedited mRNA (encoded amino acid) and edited codon in mRNA (encoded amino acid) |
|
| 264 | T | T | C to U | cCc (Pro) to cUc (Leu) |
|
| 265 | C | C to U | C to U | ucC (Ser) to ucU (Ser); synonymous edit |
|
| 31 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | cCa (Pro) to cUa (Leu) |
|
| 114 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 189 | C to U predicted | C to U | T | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 358 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCc (Ser) to uUc (Phe) |
|
| 50 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 156 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | cCa (Pro) to cUa (Leu) |
|
| 196 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | Cau (His) to Uau (Tyr) |
|
| 204 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 246 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | cCa (Pro) to cUa (Leu) |
|
| 249 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCu (Ser) to uUu (Phe) |
|
| 277 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 279 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 494 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | cCa (Pro) to cUa (Leu) |
|
| 1 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | aCg (Thr) to aUg (Met); start codon |
|
| 128 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 200 | T | T | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 225 | T | T | C to U | uCg (Ser) to uUg (Leu) |
|
| 293 | C to U predicted | C to U | T | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 433 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 437 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 97 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 17 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCg (Ser) to uUg (Leu) |
|
| 204 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | cCa (Pro) to cUa (Leu) |
|
| 72 | C to U predicted | T | C to U | cCa (Pro) to cUa (Leu) |
|
| 1 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | aCg (Thr) to aUg (Met); start codon |
|
| 103 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 277 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 21 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 1248 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 767 | C to U predicted | C | C | probably incorrect prediction |
|
| 113 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCu (Ser) to uUu (Phe) |
|
| 158 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 184 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 667 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCu (Ser) to uUu (Phe) |
|
| 809 | C to U predicted | C to U | T | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 45 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | aCa (Thr) to aUa (Ile) |
|
| 83 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 27 | C to U predicted | C to U | C to U | uCa (Ser) to uUa (Leu) |
|
| 50 | T | T | C to U | cCa (Pro) to cUa (Leu) |
| Total editing sites | 36 | 35 | 37 |
Note: T, the nucleotide thymine (T) is present at the DNA level and no editing is required; C, the nucleotide cytidine is present at the DNA level but no editing is observed or predicted; C to U, the cytidine found at the DNA level is edited to uridine in the mRNA. The genes that are no listed are not edited.
Figure 2Identity plots comparing Hyoscyamus niger chloroplast genome to other Solanaceae.
Pairwise comparisons and sequence identity between Hyoscyamus niger and five solanaceous chloroplast genomes for selected regions using the VISTA program. The Y-axis represents the % identity (50–100%) across the chloroplast genome. Coding and non-coding regions are marked in green and blue, respectively. Pink boxes indicate known (empty boxes) and novel (filled boxes) plastid regions used in the phylogenetic analyses in this study.
Figure 3Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the tribe Hyoscyameae based on 10 chloroplast markers (11,610 bp).
Taxa in red contain the cox1 intron and CCT (co-conversion tract); taxa in light blue lack the cox1 intron; taxa in black were not tested for the cox1 intron. Filled and empty squares indicate taxa with and without an inversion in the intergenic region trnC-psbM, respectively. Numbers represent support values: 100 bootstrap (BS) replicates of ML analysis (top left), 1000 bootstrap replicates of MP analysis (top right) and posterior probabilities (PP) of Bayesian Inference (bottom). BS values and PP are shown when >50% and >0.9, respectively.
Figure 4Alternative hypotheses for the evolution of the cox1 intron and CCT in the tribe Hyoscyameae.
Proposed evolutionary relationships within the tribe Hyoscyameae, showing intron acquisition (filled circle) by horizontal gene transfer. Taxa in red contain the cox1 intron and CCT (co-conversion tract); taxa in light blue lack the cox1 intron and CCT. A. Evolutionary hypothesis showing two independent intron acquisitions (homoplasious character) within the tribe. B. Evolutionary hypothesis based on a single intron acquisition (synapomorphy) within the tribe.