Literature DB >> 2485184

The development of a protocol to assess reproductive effects of toxicants in the rat.

L E Gray1, J Ostby, R Sigmon, J Ferrell, G Rehnberg, R Linder, R Cooper, J Goldman, J Laskey.   

Abstract

The determination that a chemical poses a reproductive risk to man typically relies upon fertility studies using rodents. However, fertility in rodents is often difficult to disrupt and more sensitive indicators of reproductive function should be included in the risk assessment process. The present discussion compares the sensitivity of fertility to other endpoints following exposure to known reproductive toxicants. In our studies rats were dosed from weaning through puberty , gestation, and lactation. The reproductive function of the male, the female, and the offspring was assessed. The effects of methoxychlor, carbendazim (MBC), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), and lindane are discussed and compared to fertility. For each compound a ratio (SR = sensitivity ratio) of the lowest effect level (LEL) for infertility or reduced fecundity to the LEL for the most sensitive physiologic endpoint was calculated. The SR should be large when a compound produces effects over a wide range of doses, but should equal unity when the dose-response curve is very steep. For methoxychlor, which blocked implantation, pubertal landmarks and estrous cyclicity provided rapid and sensitive indicators of the subsequent reproductive failure. The SR = 8 (100/12) for methoxychlor using data from females. In contrast, DBP and MBC directly altered testicular function, and for these compounds, sperm and testicular measures provided sensitive indicators of toxicity. The SR for MBC was 2 (100/50), while DBP had a SR of 1 (500/500). In the lindane study, fertility was not reduced but most of the pups (F1) died shortly after birth. The SR for lindane is equal to 0.5 (10/20). At 20 mg/kg the treated females were larger and their estrous cycles were erratic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2485184     DOI: 10.1016/0890-6238(88)90032-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Toxicol        ISSN: 0890-6238            Impact factor:   3.143


  9 in total

Review 1.  Endocrine disrupters: a review of some sources, effects, and mechanisms of actions on behaviour and neuroendocrine systems.

Authors:  C A Frye; E Bo; G Calamandrei; L Calzà; F Dessì-Fulgheri; M Fernández; L Fusani; O Kah; M Kajta; Y Le Page; H B Patisaul; A Venerosi; A K Wojtowicz; G C Panzica
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.627

2.  Regulation of arcuate genes by developmental exposures to endocrine-disrupting compounds in female rats.

Authors:  Troy A Roepke; Jennifer A Yang; Ali Yasrebi; Kyle J Mamounis; Elif Oruc; Aparna Mahakali Zama; Mehmet Uzumcu
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  SOT Symposium Highlight: Translatable Indicators of Testicular Toxicity: Inhibin B, MicroRNAs, and Sperm Signatures.

Authors:  Edward Dere; Linnea M Anderson; Michelle Coulson; Barry S McIntyre; Kim Boekelheide; Robert E Chapin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Environmental toxicant effects on neuroendocrine function.

Authors:  A C Gore
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  A short-term in vivo screen using fetal testosterone production, a key event in the phthalate adverse outcome pathway, to predict disruption of sexual differentiation.

Authors:  Johnathan R Furr; Christy S Lambright; Vickie S Wilson; Paul M Foster; Leon E Gray
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Early maturation and liver necrosis in the fingerling stage of Oreochromis mossambicus due to BPA can cause an ecological imbalance.

Authors:  Abhijit Manna; Chinnaiah Amutha
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 7.  Fifteen years after "Wingspread"--environmental endocrine disrupters and human and wildlife health: where we are today and where we need to go.

Authors:  Andrew K Hotchkiss; Cynthia V Rider; Chad R Blystone; Vickie S Wilson; Phillip C Hartig; Gerald T Ankley; Paul M Foster; Clark L Gray; L Earl Gray
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Reproductive toxicity of sodium valproate in male rats.

Authors:  Laxminarayana Bairy; Vijay Paul; Yeshwanth Rao
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.200

9.  Tools to evaluate estrogenic potency of dietary phytoestrogens:A consensus paper from the EU Thematic Network "Phytohealth" (QLKI-2002-2453).

Authors:  N M Saarinen; C Bingham; S Lorenzetti; A Mortensen; S Mäkelä; P Penttinen; I K Sørensen; L M Valsta; F Virgili; G Vollmer; A Wärri; O Zierau
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.523

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.