Literature DB >> 24851796

Treatment patterns among colorectal cancer patients in South Australia: a demonstration of the utility of population-based data linkage.

Kerri R Beckmann1, Alice Bennett, Graeme P Young, David M Roder.   

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Population level data on colorectal cancer (CRC) management in Australia are lacking. This study assessed broad level patterns of care and concordance with guidelines for CRC management at the population level using linked administrative data from both the private and public health sectors across South Australia. Disparities in CRC treatment were also explored.
METHOD: Linking information from the South Australian Cancer Registry, hospital separations, radiotherapy services and hospital-based cancer registry systems provided data on the socio-demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics for 4641 CRC patients, aged 50-79 years, diagnosed from 2003 to 2008. Factors associated with receiving site/stage-specific treatments (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy) and overall concordance with treatment guidelines were identified using Poisson regression analysis.
RESULTS: About 83% of colon and 56% of rectal cancer patients received recommended treatment. Provision of neo-adjuvant/adjuvant therapies may be less than optimal. Radiotherapy was less likely among older patients (prevalence ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.5-0.8). Chemotherapy was less likely among older patients (0.7, 0.6-0.8), those with severe or multiple co-morbidities (0.8, 0.7-0.9), and those from rural areas (0.9, 0.8-1.0). Overall discordance with treatment guidelines was more likely among rectal cancer patients (3.0, 2.7-3.3), older patients (1.6, 1.4-1.8), those with multiple co-morbid conditions (1.3, 1.1-1.4), and those living in rural areas (1.2, 1.0-1.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Greater emphasis should be given to ensure CRC patients who may benefit from neo-adjuvant/adjuvant therapies have access to these treatments.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal neoplasm; disparities; health services research; patterns of care; record linkage

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24851796     DOI: 10.1111/jep.12183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  7 in total

Review 1.  Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? The importance of evidence-based datasets.

Authors:  D W Ellis; J Srigley
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Colorectal cancer in young patients: is it a distinct clinical entity?

Authors:  Hadar Goldvaser; Ofer Purim; Yulia Kundel; Daniel Shepshelovich; Tzippy Shochat; Lital Shemesh-Bar; Aaron Sulkes; Baruch Brenner
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia.

Authors:  Michael J Ireland; Sonja March; Fiona Crawford-Williams; Mandy Cassimatis; Joanne F Aitken; Melissa K Hyde; Suzanne K Chambers; Jiandong Sun; Jeff Dunn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Geographical Variations in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer in Australia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fiona Crawford-Williams; Sonja March; Michael J Ireland; Arlen Rowe; Belinda Goodwin; Melissa K Hyde; Suzanne K Chambers; Joanne F Aitken; Jeff Dunn
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Sociodemographic disparities in survival from colorectal cancer in South Australia: a population-wide data linkage study.

Authors:  Kerri R Beckmann; Alice Bennett; Graeme P Young; Stephen R Cole; Rohit Joshi; Jacqui Adams; Nimit Singhal; Christos Karapetis; David Wattchow; David Roder
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Impact of matching error on linked mortality outcome in a data linkage of secondary mental health data with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and mortality records in South East London: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Amelia Jewell; Matthew Broadbent; Richard D Hayes; Ruth Gilbert; Robert Stewart; Johnny Downs
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Oncological treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer in Greenland.

Authors:  Marie Odgaard; Nicolai Lohse; Alice Juhl Petersen; Lene Bæksgaard
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.228

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.