| Literature DB >> 24849654 |
Jana Hemmerling1, Katharina Heller1, Gabriele Hörmannsperger1, Monika Bazanella1, Thomas Clavel1, George Kollias2, Dirk Haller1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory disorders have been increasing in incidence over the past decades following geographical patterns of industrialization. Fetal exposure to maternal inflammation may alter organ functions and the offspring's disease risk. We studied the development of genetically-driven ileitis and colitis in response to maternal inflammation using mouse models.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24849654 PMCID: PMC4029898 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Breeding schemes and the maternal inflammatory environment.
Breeding schemes of TNF- (A) and IL10-driven (B) maternal inflammation. Offspring developed under non inflamed conditions (white background: white mouse = WT or IL10+/−; grey mouse = ARE or IL10−/−) and under maternal inflammation (grey background: white mouse = iWTor iIL10+/−; grey mouse = iARE or iIL10−/−). (C) Representative H&E-stained transversal sections of the distal ileum and individual plots of ileitis score in WT (n = 6) and ARE (n = 8) dams. (D) Total colitis score in IL10+/− (n = 6) and IL10−/− dams (n = 8) and representative H&E-stained sections of distal colon from non-inflamed IL10+/− and inflamed IL10−/− dams. Scores [0, not inflamed, to 12, highly inflamed] were determined using tissue sections from dams sacrificed 3 weeks after giving birth. TNF in maternal plasma indicates that the inflammation is also systemically relevant in both the ileitis (E) and colitis (F) models. Individual data and means are shown; t-test, *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.
Primer sequences and UPL probe IDs for qPCR analysis.
| Gene | Forward primer | Reverse primer | Probe | Amplicon |
|
| 5′-tcc act cat ggc aaa ttc aa | 5′-ttt gat gtt agt ggg gtc tcg | #9 | 108 nt |
|
| 5′-atc cct cca ccc tat gac aa | 5′-gcc cca ggt aag caa act t | #108 | 97 nt |
|
| 5′-aaa tca gtt atg gtt cct ttg gtc | 5′-gct cta gaa tta cca cag tta tcc aa | #55 | 67 nt |
|
| 5′-acc tta cct cgg caa gtt tct | 5′-ttg tag agc tgc tgg tca gg | #76 | 75 nt |
|
| 5′-atc gtt ttg ctg gtg tct cc | 5′-gga gtc cag tcc acc tct aca | #78 | 80 nt |
|
| 5′-tgc cta tgt ctc agc ctc ttc | 5′-gag gcc att tgg gaa ctt ct | #49 | 117 nt |
Housekeeping genes are underlined.
Figure 2Postnatal tissue inflammation in Tnf and IL10 mice is not affected by maternal inflammation.
(A) Ileitis scores from WT, iWT, ARE and iARE (each n = 5–7) offspring sacrificed at 8 weeks of age with representative H&E stained sections of the distal ileum. (B) Total colitis scores from IL10 +/−, iIL10 +/−, IL10 −/− and iIL10 −/− offspring at 12 weeks of age (n = 5–15) with representative H&E-stained sections of the distal colon. Individual data and means are shown, *p<0.05, *** p<0.001 Kruskal-Wallis Test with Dunn's multiple comparisons. (C+D) Representative microscopic pictures (600× magnification) of confocal laser microscopy for Ly6G-immunofluorescence (red) from distal ileum in WT, iWT, ARE and iARE offspring and from distal colon in IL10, iIL10 and iIL10 offspring. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue). Three pictures per mouse were analyzed. Lamina propria and submucosa were defined as regions of interest. The numbers of Ly6G-positive cells per mm2 from all 3 pictures per mouse were counted. Individual data and means are shown (Two-Way ANOVA, *p<0.05, **p<0.01). Correlation analysis in Tnf and IL10 offspring indicated strong associations between histopathological scores and infiltration of Ly6G-positive neutrophils. (E+F) Whole tissue specimens were analyzed for Tnf and Il12p40 gene expression in offspring from ileitis and colitis mouse models as described in the method section. RNA was isolated from distal ileal cryosections (3×10 µm) of WT, iWT, ARE and iARE offspring and from colonic swiss rolls of IL10, iIL10, IL10 and iIL10 offspring (n = 5 each). Single values and means are indicated as 2−ΔCt. Two Way ANOVA, *p<0.05, **p<0.001, ***p<0.0001.
Figure 3Fetal gene expression profiles in the ileal epithelium are overwritten by postnatal inflammation.
(A) Randomly selected fetuses of the last 5 Theiler stages (TS) (15–19 dpc). (B) 17.5 dpc fetus genotypes plotted against fetal size and weight (total of 98 fetuses); Two-Way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak test, *p<0.05, ***p<0.001. (C) Number of regulated genes in iWT, ARE and iARE mice at 17.5 dpc and 8 weeks of age when compared to WT considering a threshold fold change of ± 1.5, p<0.05 (each group and time point n = 5). (D) Heat map of top-100 up- and down-regulated genes in iWT, ARE and iARE mice plotted as signal log ratios from −3 to 3. Two distinct gene clusters are shown between maternal (fetal iWT and iARE) and postnatal inflammation (ARE and iARE). Data are based on corresponding WT control mice according to MADMAX statistical analysis. (E) Microarray validation of the Tnf and C3 genes by plotting individual microarray fluorescence intensities against 2−ΔCt values obtained by qPCR from both prenatal and postnatal mice. Correlation coefficient (r) and significance levels are indicated in the respective plots. (F) Significantly overrepresented GO_BP of prenatal (red bars) and postnatal (grey bars) iWT, ARE and iARE mice. Numbers below the GO terms indicate total genes for the particular process. Numbers next to the bars indicate observed numbers of significantly regulated genes belonging to the respective process.
Top 10 up- and down-regulated overlapping genes between prenatal WT/iWT and WT/iARE gene expression patterns (effect of maternal inflammation) and between postnatal WT/ARE and WT/iARE gene expression patterns (effect of offspring genotype/disease).
| Overlapping genes between WT/iWTand WT/iARE at 17.5 dpc | Overlapping genes between WT/ARE and WT/iARE at 8 weeks | ||||||
| ID | Gene | FC iWT | FC iARE | ID | Gene | FC ARE | FC iARE |
| 18489 |
| 22.45 | 15.53 | 12266 |
| 39.04 | 37.53 |
| 16204 |
| 15.61 | 30.29 | 20201 |
| 38.08 | 21.38 |
| 58861 |
| 6.69 | 4.20 | 17105 |
| 25.47 | 21.82 |
| 319636 |
| 6.66 | 8.17 | 68891 |
| 18.34 | 16.52 |
| 17967 |
| 5.58 | 4.72 | 17388 |
| 16.11 | 16.31 |
| 12843 |
| 5.29 | 3.04 | 70045 |
| 15.46 | 14.98 |
| 12660 |
| 5.17 | 5.74 | 20202 |
| 15.46 | 8.83 |
| 12552 |
| 4.82 | 2.04 | 22418 |
| 14.78 | 15.00 |
| 77700 |
| 4.68 | 3.47 | 14990 |
| 14.42 | 17.06 |
| 19876 |
| 4.54 | 4.22 | 13419 |
| 11.42 | 16.73 |
| 208677 |
| −4.44 | −1.66 | 105387 |
| −8.71 | −12.00 |
| 18605 |
| −5.13 | −5.35 | 70564 |
| −8.82 | −5.89 |
| 68979 |
| −5.54 | −8.16 | 13487 |
| −8.96 | −7.01 |
| 381259 |
| −5.62 | −4.79 | 14344 |
| −9.18 | −8.35 |
| 667373 |
| −5.81 | −2.39 | 109731 |
| −9.59 | −8.39 |
| 100647 |
| −6.01 | −7.90 | 17161 |
| −12.93 | −15.73 |
| 66350 |
| −7.53 | −6.07 | 170752 |
| −16.1 | −19.65 |
| 19336 |
| −8.62 | −6.47 | 432720 |
| −17.17 | −10.11 |
| 107272 |
| −9.03 | −11.71 | 12116 |
| −22.04 | −23.73 |
| 12696 |
| −10.18 | −7.56 | 16173 |
| −25.04 | −24.48 |
FC = log 2 based fold change, p<0.05.
Top 5 up- and down-regulated genes in iWT, ARE and iARE mice pre- and postnatally.
| 5 most up- and down- regulated genes | ||||||||
| 17.5 dpc | 8 weeks | |||||||
| ID | Gene | Description | FC | ID | Gene | Description | FC | |
| iWT | 18489 | Reg3b | regenerating islet-derived 3 beta | 22.45 | 14170 | Fgf15 | fibroblast growth factor 15 | 4.50 |
| 16204 | Fabp6 | fatty acid binding protein 6, ileal (gastrotropin) | 15.61 | 56485 | Slc2a5 | solute carrier family 2, member 5 | 4.15 | |
| 58861 | Cysltr1 | cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 | 6.69 | 224093 | Fam43a | family with sequence similarity 43, member A | 2.87 | |
| 319636 | Fsd1l | fibronectin type III and SPRY domain containing 1-like | 6.66 | 64452 | Slc5a4a | solute carrier family 5, member 4a | 2.73 | |
| 17967 | Ncam1 | neural cell adhesion molecule 1 | 5.58 | 17388 | Mmp15 | matrix metallopeptidase 15 | 2.48 | |
| 12696 | Cirbp | cold inducible RNA binding protein | −10.18 | 20753 | Sprr1a | small proline-rich protein 1A | −3.88 | |
| 107272 | Psat1 | phosphoserine aminotransferase 1 | −9.03 | 14583 | Gfpt1 | glutamine fructose-6-phosphate transaminase 1 | −3.03 | |
| 19336 | Rab24 | RAB24, member RAS oncogene family | −8.62 | 625599 | Gml | GPI anchored molecule like protein | −2.97 | |
| 66350 | Pla2g12a | phospholipase A2, group XIIA | −7.53 | 71578 | Sval1 | seminal vesicle antigen-like 1 | −2.80 | |
| 14607 | Gip | gastric inhibitory polypeptide | −6.38 | 20210 | Saa3 | serum amyloid A 3 | −2.73 | |
| ARE | 18489 | Reg3b | regenerating islet-derived 3 beta | 3.73 | 12266 | C3 | complement component 3 | 39.04 |
| 69814 | Prss32 | protease, serine, 32 | 3.41 | 20201 | S100a8 | S100 calcium binding protein A8 (calgranulin A) | 38.08 | |
| 16204 | Fabp6 | fatty acid binding protein 6, ileal (gastrotropin) | 3.23 | 17105 | Lyz2 | lysozyme 2 | 25.47 | |
| 19662 | Rbp4 | retinol binding protein 4, plasma | 2.37 | 68891 | Cd177 | CD177 antigen | 18.34 | |
| 56312 | Nupr1 | nuclear protein 1 | 2.02 | 17388 | Mmp15 | matrix metallopeptidase 15 | 16.11 | |
| 259301 | Leap2 | liver-expressed antimicrobial peptide 2 | −3.60 | 16173 | Il18 | interleukin 18 | −25.04 | |
| 56012 | Pgam2 | phosphoglycerate mutase 2 | −2.69 | 12116 | Bhmt | betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase | −22.04 | |
| 106861 | Abhd3 | abhydrolase domain containing 3 | −2.66 | 432720 | Akr1c19 | aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C19 | −17.17 | |
| 23958 | Nr2e3 | nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group E, member 3 | −2.51 | 170752 | Bco2 | beta-carotene oxygenase 2 | −16.10 | |
| 14058 | F10 | coagulation factor X | −2.28 | 17161 | Maoa | monoamine oxidase A | −12.93 | |
| iARE | 16204 | Fabp6 | fatty acid binding protein 6, ileal (gastrotropin) | 30.29 | 12266 | C3 | complement component 3 | 37.53 |
| 14963 | H2-Bl | histocompatibility 2, blastocyst | 26.14 | 17105 | Lyz2 | lysozyme 2 | 21.82 | |
| 18489 | Reg3b | regenerating islet-derived 3 beta | 15.53 | 20201 | S100a8 | S100 calcium binding protein A8 (calgranulin A) | 21.38 | |
| 67092 | Gatm | glycine amidinotransferase | 12.39 | 14990 | H2-M2 | histocompatibility 2, M region locus 2 | 17.06 | |
| 319636 | Fsd1l | fibronectin type III and SPRY domain containing 1-like | 8.17 | 13419 | Dnase1 | deoxyribonuclease I | 16.73 | |
| 545369 | Gm5835 | predicted gene 5835 | −12.81 | 16173 | Il18 | interleukin 18 | −24.48 | |
| 107272 | Psat1 | phosphoserine aminotransferase 1 | −11.71 | 12116 | Bhmt | betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase | −23.73 | |
| 665146 | Gm7517 | predicted gene 7517 | −11.21 | 170752 | Bco2 | beta-carotene oxygenase 2 | −19.65 | |
| 68979 | Nol11 | nucleolar protein 11 | −8.16 | 17161 | Maoa | monoamine oxidase A | −15.73 | |
| 12466 | Cct6a | chaperonin containing Tcp1, subunit 6a (zeta) | −7.92 | 105387 | Akr1c14 | aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C14 | −12.00 | |
Fold changes refer to WT control mice according to MADMAX statistical analysis (n = 5 per group, p<0.05; FC = log 2 based fold change).
Figure 4Pre- and postnatal REG3B protein expression in the distal ileum and offspring's caecal bacterial diversity are unaffected by maternal inflammation.
(A–C) Immunofluorescence analysis overtime (17.5 dpc, 3 and 8 weeks) of REG3B (green) from distal ileal sections of WT, iWT, ARE, iARE mice. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). (D) Data represent mean fluorescence intensity of REG3B signal per µm2 ±SD from 5 mice per group (3 regions per mouse were evaluated). Significant differences in comparison to WT mice were assessed by Two-Way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak method; **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, n.d. = not detectable. (E) Western blot analysis of REG3B in cecal content (B = bacterial fraction, CW = cecal water fraction, M1–M3 = 3 individual mice of each group). (F+G) PCoA analysis of weighted UniFrac distances indicated no change in phylogenetic diversity at 3 weeks of age after cohousing (F) of WT and Tnf dams and litters (n = 10–25 offspring per group) (left panel; even sampling of 28,633 sequences) or without co-housing (G) (n = 4–6 offspring per group) (right panel; even sampling of 16,865 sequences). 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicons of the V4 region (233 bp) in caecal contents were sequenced using a MiSeq platform and analyzed as described in the methods section.