| Literature DB >> 24849588 |
Mohamed Ridha Rjeibi1, Mohamed Gharbi1, Moez Mhadhbi1, Wiem Mabrouk1, Boutheïna Ayari1, Ines Nasfi1, Mohamed Jedidi1, Limam Sassi1, Mourad Rekik2, Mohamed Aziz Darghouth1.
Abstract
In this study, the prevalence of piroplasms in sheep and goats was assessed with Giemsa-stained blood smear examination, PCR and nested PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) to identify Babesia and Theileria species, respectively, in 338 small ruminants (172 sheep and 166 goats) from three sites in North-West Tunisia during the 2011 summer season. The overall infection prevalence of piroplasms in Giemsa-stained blood smears was 3.2% (11/338), with a parasitaemia ranging from 0.01 to 0.05%. PCR detected two species, namely Babesia ovis (in sheep and goats) and Theileria ovis (in sheep), with an overall prevalence of 16.3%. The molecular prevalence of B. ovis was significantly higher in sheep than in goats (17.4% and 9%, respectively, p = 0.034). The same trend was observed for T. ovis in sheep and goats (5.8% and 0%, respectively, p = 0.004). Comparison of the partial sequences of the 18S ssu rRNA gene revealed 100% similarity amongst Babesia from sheep and goats. The single Theileria sequence in this study showed 100% similarity to T. ovis. A high similarity with all the blasted genotypes was reported for Theileria and Babesia sequences. This is the first molecular detection of B. ovis and genetic characterisation of small ruminants' piroplasms in Africa. © M.R. Rjeibi et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2014.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24849588 PMCID: PMC4029076 DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2014025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite ISSN: 1252-607X Impact factor: 3.000
Figure 1.Sheep and goat PCR infection prevalence of Babesia ovis and Theileria ovis in the Aïn Draham locality (North-West Tunisia).
primers used for detection by PCR of Babesia ovis and Theileria spp. from sheep and goats in this study.
| Primer specificity | Target Gene | Name | Type | Primers 5′–3′ | Product size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18S rRNA | RLB-F | Forward primer | GAGGTAGTGACAAGAAATAACAATA | 460–520 | Gubbels et al. [ |
| RLB-R | Reverse primer | TCTTCGATCCCCTAACTTTC | ||||
|
| 18S rRNA | Bbo-F | Forward primer | TGGGCAGGACCTTGGTTCTTCT | 549 | Aktas et al. [ |
| Bbo-R | Reverse primer | CCGCGTAGCGCCGGCTAAATA | ||||
|
| 18S rRNA | Thei F1 | Forward primer | AACCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAG | 1700 | Heidarpour Bami et al. [ |
| Thei R1 | Reverse primer | AAACCTTGTTACGACTTCTC | ||||
| 18S rRNA | Thei F2 | Forward primer | TGATGTTCGTTTYTACATGG | 1417–1426 | Heidarpour Bami et al. [ | |
| Thei R2 | Reverse primer | CTAGGCATTCCTCGTTCACG |
RFLP pattern of different Theileria species after HpaII and HaeII digestion (Heidarpour Bami et al. [21]).
|
| Digestion products obtained by | Digestion products obtained by |
|---|---|---|
|
| 856, 326, 204 and 39 | 1131 and 295 |
|
| 1178, 106, 94 and 39 | No digestion |
|
| 900, 278, 106, 94 and 39 | No digestion |
Figure 3.The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method [34]. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1100 replicates) is shown next to the branches [16]. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Tamura-Nei method [38] and are in the units of the number of base differences per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5.1 [39]. GenBank accession numbers are given in parentheses. Species described in this study are indicated with a black square. (A) Partial sequence 18S ssu rRNA gene phylogenetic tree of the species identified in this survey and the main small ruminants’ Theileria species. (B) Partial sequence 18S ssu rRNA gene phylogenetic tree of the species identified in this survey and the main small ruminants’ Babesia species.
Figure 2.Digestion pattern of nested Theileria spp. 18S ssu rRNA gene PCR products by HpaII. Lane M: 100 bp ladder; lane 1: Theileria spp. DNA; lanes 2–4: Theileria ovis (856, 326 and 204 bp).
Theileria ovis and Babesia ovis infection prevalence and intensity in sheep and goats by Giemsa-stained blood smears and PCR in Aïn Draham, North-West Tunisia.
| Species | Epidemiological indicator | Technique | Sheep | Goats | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Infection prevalence = 100 × (number of positive blood samples/number of examined blood samples) (%) | MO | 5/172 (2.9) | 4/166 (2.4) | [0.28; 5.48] | 0.77 |
| PCR | 30/172 (17.4) | 15/166 (9.04) | [1.05; 4.34] | 0.022 | ||
| Infection intensity = 100 × (number of positive red blood cells/number of examined red blood cells) | MO | 0.015 | 0.031 | [0; 0.004] | 0.102 | |
|
| Infection prevalence = 100 × (number of positive blood samples/number of examined blood samples) (%) | MO | 2/172 (1.16) | 0/166 (0) | NA | 0.16 |
| PCR | 10/172 (5.81) | 0/166 (0) | NA | 0.001 | ||
| Infection intensity = 100 × (number of positive red blood cells/number of examined red blood cells) (%) | MO | 0.022 | 0 | [0; 0.005] | 0.105 |
MO – Microscopy observation.
NA – not applicable.
CI – 95% Confidence interval.
Significant test.
Association between the presence of sheep and goat piroplasms and different parameters based on PCR.
| Species | Parameter |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive/examined (%) | OR [95% CI] | Positive/examined (%) | OR [95% CI] | |||
| Sheep | Gender | Female | 23/126 (18.2) | 0.9 [0.27; 2.96] | 10/126 (7.9) | NA |
| Male | 7/46 (15.2) | 0/46 (0) | ||||
| Breed | Barbarine | 18/68 (26.5) | 2.76 [1.15; 6.61] | 5/68 (7.3) | 1.57 [0.38; 6.58] | |
| QFO | 12/104 (11.5) | 5/104 (4.8) | ||||
| Age group | <1 year | 4/21 (19) | 3.37 [0.55; 21.81] | 3/21 (14.3) | 3.67 [0.44; 34.93] | |
| 1 to 2 years | 3/46 (6.5) | 2/46 (4.3) | ||||
| >2 years | 23/105 (21.9) | 4.02 [1.06; 17.88] | 5/105 (4.8) | 1.1 [0.18; 8.55] | ||
| Locality | Aïn Draham | 1/28 (3.6) | 2/28 (7.1) | NA | ||
| Tbeïnia | 11/101 (10.9) | 3.3 [0.41; 71.41] | 8/101 (7.9) | |||
| El Homrane | 18/43 (41.9) | 19.44 [2.4; 419.3] | 0/43 (0) | |||
| Goats | Gender | Male | 4/40 (10) | 1.39 [0.29; 6.96] | 0/40 (0) | NA |
| Female | 11/126 (8.7) | 0/126 (0) | ||||
| Breed | Damascus | 6/22 (27.3) | 5.63 [1.53; 20.48] | 0/22 (0) | NA | |
| Local | 9/144 (6.2) | 0/144 (0) | ||||
| Age group | <1 year | 0/18 (0) | NA | 0/18 (0) | NA | |
| 1 to 2 years | 6/42 (14.3) | 0/42 (0) | ||||
| >2 years | 9/106 (8.5) | 0/106 (0) | ||||
| Locality | Aïn Draham | 4/25 (16%) | NA | 0/25 (0) | NA | |
| Tbeïnia | 11/97 (11.3%) | 0/97 (0) | ||||
| El Homrane | 0/44 (0%) | 0/44 (0) | ||||
| Overall | Gender | Female | 34/252 (13.5%) | 0.67 [0.26; 1.6] | 10/252 (4) | NA |
| Male | 11/86 (12.8%) | 0/86 (0) | ||||
| Age group | <1 year | 4/39 (10.2%) | 3/39 (7.7) | 3.58 [0.46; 32.27] | ||
| 1 to 2 years | 9/88 (10.2%) | 1 [0.26; 4.16] | 2/88 (2.3) | |||
| >2 years | 32/211 (15.2%) | 1.56 [0.59; 5.58] | 5/211 (2.4) | 1.04 [0.18; 7.93] | ||
| Locality | Aïn Draham | 5/53 (9.4%) | 2/53 (3.8) | NA | ||
| Tbeïnia | 22/198 (11.1%) | 1.2 [0.4; 3.83] | 8/198 (4) | |||
| El Homrane | 18/87 (20.7%) | 2.5 [0.8; 8.32] | 0/87 (0) | |||
0.001 ≤ p < 0.05.
p < 0.001.
NA – not applicable.
Queue Fine de l’Ouest.