| Literature DB >> 21894263 |
F Iqbal1, M Fatima, S Shahnawaz, M Naeem, Rs Shaikh, M Ali, As Shaikh, M Aktas, M Ali.
Abstract
Babesiosis is a parasitic infection due to the multiplication of tick borne parasite, Babesia sp., in erythrocytes of host, which includes a wide variety of vertebrates including small ruminants causing decreased livestock output and hence economic losses. The objective of the present study was to establish a PCR based method for the detection of Babesia sp. in small ruminant population in Southern Punjab and to determine the risk factors involve in the spread of babesiosis. A total of 107 blood samples were collected from 40 sheep and 67 goats in seven districts of Southern Punjab from randomly selected herds. Data on the characteristics of the animals and the herd were collected through questionnaires. 36 blood samples (34% of total) produced the DNA fragment specific for 18S rRNA gene of Babesia sp., by PCR amplification, of which 20 were sheep and 16 were goats. Samples from all seven district contained Babesia positive samples and prevalence varied between 18 to 68%. It was observed that male animals (P = 0.009) and young animals under one year of age (P = 0.01) were more prone to the parasite. It was observed that herds consist of more than 15 animals (P = 0.007), composed of mixed species of small ruminants (P = 0.022), associated with dogs (P = 0.003) and dogs having ticks on their bodies (P = 0.011) were among the major risk factors for the spread of babesiosis in small ruminants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21894263 PMCID: PMC3671477 DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2011183229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite ISSN: 1252-607X Impact factor: 3.000
Fig 1.Map of Punjab. Sampling sites in southern Punjab are marked with circles.
Sampling sites along with the total number of samples collected (N) from each district. Prevalence of parasite is given in parenthesis.
| District | N | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dera Ghazi Khan | 38 | 7 (18%) | 31 (82%) |
| Bahawalnagar | 5 | 1 (20%) | 4 (80%) |
| Multan | 18 | 4 (22%) | 14 (78%) |
| Khanewal | 3 | 1 (33%) | 2 (67%) |
| Muzaffar Garh | 13 | 5 (38%) | 89 (62%) |
| Vehari | 5 | 2 (40%) | 3 (60%) |
| Layyah | 25 | 15 (60%) | 10 (40%) |
| Total Animals (Sheep and Goat) | 107 | 36 (34) | 71 (66) |
| Sheep | 40 | 20 (50%) | 20 (50%) |
| Goat | 67 | 16 (24%) | 51 (76%) |
Association between parasite prevalence in goats and sheep and the studied parameters describing animal characters.
| Animal Type | Parameter | No. of samples | Positive | Negative | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheep and Goat | Sex | Male | 37 | 20 (54%) | 17 (46%) | 0.009 |
| Female | 70 | 16 (23%) | 54 (77%) | ** | ||
| Age | > 1 year | 72 | 17 (24%) | 55 (76%) | 0.01 | |
| < 1 year | 35 | 19 (61%) | 16 (39%) | ** | ||
| Tick burden | No tick | 96 | 31 (32%) | 65 (68%) | 0.522 | |
| One or more ticks | 11 | 5 (45%) | 6 (55%) | NS | ||
| Sheep | Sex | Male | 20 | 15 (75%) | 5 (25%) | 0.71 |
| Female | 20 | 5 (25%) | 15 (75%) | NS | ||
| Age | > 1 year | 20 | 6 (30%) | 14 (70%) | 0.67 | |
| < 1 year | 20 | 14 (70%) | 6 (30%) | NS | ||
| Tick burden | No tick | 33 | 18 (55%) | 15 (45%) | 0.07 | |
| One or more ticks | 7 | 2 (28%) | 5 (72%) | NS | ||
| Goat | Sex | Male | 17 | 5 (29%) | 12 (71%) | 0.528 |
| Female | 50 | 11 (22%) | 39 (78%) | NS | ||
| Age | > 1 year | 52 | 11 (21%) | 41 (79%) | 0.326 | |
| < 1 year | 15 | 5 (33%) | 10 (67%) | NS | ||
| Tick burden | No tick | 62 | 13 (21%) | 49 (79%) | 0.083 | |
| One or more ticks | 5 | 3 (60%) | 2 (40%) | NS | ||
Probability of Fisher Exact test is mentioned for each parameter: NS = non significant (P > 0.05); ** = significant (P < 0.01).
Association between parasite prevalence in sheep and goats and the studied parameters describing animal and herd characters.
| Parameter | No. of samples | Positive | Negative | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size of herd | 1-15 | 72 | 17 (24%) | 56 (76%) | 0.007 |
| 15-30 | 35 | 18 (51%) | 16 (49%) | ** | |
| Herd composition | Goat only | 51 | 14 (27%) | 37 (73%) | 0.022 |
| Sheep only | 18 | 4 (22%) | 14 (78%) | * | |
| Sheep and goat together | 38 | 17 (45%) | 21 (55%) | ||
| Association of dog with the herd | Dog absent | 76 | 17 (22%) | 59 (78%) | 0.003 |
| Dog present | 31 | 18 (58%) | 13 (42%) | ** | |
| Tick burden on dog | No | 76 | 19 (25%) | 57 (75%) | 0.011 |
| Yes | 31 | 17 (55%) | 14 (45%) | * | |
Probability of Fisher Exact test is mention for each parameter except herd composition where ANOVA is applied: NS = non significant (P > 0.05); * = least significant (P < 0.05); ** = significant (P < 0.01).