| Literature DB >> 24849572 |
Atsushi Yamada1, Sachiko Minamiguchi2, Yoshiharu Sakai3, Takahiro Horimatsu4, Manabu Muto5, Tsutomu Chiba6, C Richard Boland7, Ajay Goel7.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: Individuals with serrated <span class="Disease">polyps (SP) are at higher risk for synchronous colorectal advanced neoplasms (AN) and cancers. However, it remains unclear whether there is a unique involvement of the serrated pathway and/or the classical adenoma-carcinoma sequence in this setting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24849572 PMCID: PMC4029807 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
PCR primers used in this study.
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse | Bio-ATA | |
| Sequencing |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse | Bio-TAG | |
| Sequencing |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse | Bio-AAA | |
| Sequencing |
|
Patients' characteristics.
| AN+SP group (n = 40) | AN-only group (n = 119) |
| ||
|
| Median (Range) | 72 (38–87) | 68 (41–90) | 0.083 |
|
| Male (%) | 30 (75.0) | 67 (56.3) | 0.040 |
| Female (%) | 10 (25.0) | 52 (43.7) | ||
|
| Present (%) | 3 (7.5) | 5 (4.2) | 0.416 |
| Absent (%) | 37 (92.5) | 114 (95.8) | ||
|
| Present | 6 (18.8) | 17 (17.2) | 0.795 |
| Absent | 26 (81.2) | 82 (82.8) |
Data were not available in 28 cases.
Characteristics of serrated polyps (SP) (n = 75) .
| Size (mm) | Median (Range) | 5 (1–20) |
|
| Right (%) | 19 (25.3) |
| Left (%) | 56 (74.7) | |
|
| Protruded (%) | 16 (21.3) |
| Superficial (%) | 59 (78.7) | |
|
| Hyperplastic polyp (%) | 35 (46.7) |
| Sessile serrated polyp/adenoma (%) | 17 (22.7) | |
| Traditional serrated adenoma (%) | 9 (12.0) | |
| Serrated lesion (%) | 14 (18.7) | |
|
| Wild type (%) | 19 (48.7) |
| Mutant (%) | 20 (51.3) | |
|
| Wild type (%) | 34 (87.2) |
| Mutant (%) | 5 (12.8) |
DNA samples for mutation analyses were available for 39 SPs.
Clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal intraepithelial neoplasms in AN+SP and AN-only groups.
| AN+SP group (n = 40) | AN-only group (n = 83) |
| ||
|
| Right (%) | 23 (57.5) | 28 (33.7) | 0.019 |
| Left (%) | 17 (42.5) | 55 (66.3) | ||
|
| Median (Range) | 13 (8–40) | 12 (5–105) | 0.218 |
|
| Protruded (%) | 21 (52.5) | 48 (57.8) | 0.698 |
| Superficial (%) | 19 (47.5) | 35 (42.2) | ||
|
| Tubular adenoma (%) | 20 (50.0) | 39 (47.0) | 0.820 |
| Tubulo-villous adenoma (%) | 5 (12.5) | 14 (16.9) | ||
| High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (%) | 15 (37.5) | 30 (36.1) |
Clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancers (CRC) in AN+SP and AN-only groups.
| AN+SP group (n = 35) | AN-only group (n = 96) |
| ||
|
| Right (%) | 4 (11.4) | 19 (19.8) | 0.312 |
| Left (%) | 31 (88.6) | 77 (80.2) | ||
|
| Median (Range) | 40 (10–105) | 35 (8–110) | 0.706 |
|
| Well differentiated (%) | 2 (5.7) | 16 (16.7) | - |
| Moderately differentiated (%) | 32 (91.4) | 77 (80.2) | ||
| Poorly differentiated (%) | 1 (2.9) | 3 (3.1) | ||
|
| 1 (%) | 5 (14.3) | 15 (15.6) | 0.961 |
| 2 (%) | 10 (28.6) | 23 (24.0) | ||
| 3 (%) | 14 (40.0) | 41 (42.7) | ||
| 4 (%) | 6 (17.1) | 17 (17.7) | ||
|
| 0 (%) | 26 (74.3) | 63 (66.3) | 0.616 |
| 1 (%) | 6 (17.1) | 24 (25.3) | ||
| 2 (%) | 3 (8.6) | 8 (8.4) | ||
|
| 0 (%) | 33 (94.3) | 88 (91.7) | 1.000 |
| 1 (%) | 2 (5.7) | 8 (8.3) | ||
|
| 1 (%) | 13 (37.1) | 31 (32.6) | 0.848 |
| 2 (%) | 12 (34.3) | 29 (30.5) | ||
| 3 (%) | 8 (22.9) | 27 (28.4) | ||
| 4 (%) | 2 (5.7) | 8 (8.4) |
Statistical analysis was not conducted because of the small sample number.
Lymph nodes metastasis status and stage could not be determined in one lesion.
Figure 1Survival analyses for patients with invasive cancer.
Cumulative overall (A) and disease-free (B) survival rates showed no differences between AN+SP and AN-only groups.
Figure 2Representative results of the pyrosequencing examining BRAF and KRAS mutations in ANs.
Pyrograms of the representative cases showing BRAF wild-type (A), BRAF mutation (B, T to A mutation at codon 600), KRAS wild-type (C), KRAS mutation (D, G to A mutation at codon 12).
Mutational status of the BRAF and KRAS genes in advanced neoplasms (AN).
| AN+SP group (n = 75) | AN-only group (n = 174) |
| ||
|
| Wild type (%) | 69 (92.0) | 173 (99.4) | 0.003 |
| Mutant (%) | 6 (8.0) | 1 (0.6) | ||
|
| Wild type (%) | 56 (74.7) | 113 (64.9) | 0.142 |
| Mutant (%) | 19 (25.3) | 61 (35.1) | ||
|
| Wild type for both genes (%) | 50 (66.7) | 112 (64.4) | 0.773 |
| Mutant for either | 25 (33.3) | 62 (35.6) |
BRAF and KRAS mutations were mutually exclusive.
Figure 3A representative case of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) with contiguous conventional adenoma.
Histological images (H&E) of an AN which shows contiguous parts of a tubular adenoma and a HGIN in the same lesion. (A: low magnification, B: high magnification).
Presence of contiguous components of conventional adenomas and serrated polyps (SP) in high-grade intraepithelial neoplasms (HGIN).
| AN+SP group (n = 15) | AN-only group (n = 30) |
| ||
|
| Present (%) | 14 (93.3) | 27 (90.0) | 1.000 |
| Absent (%) | 1 (6.7) | 3 (10.0) | ||
|
| Present (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.3) | 1.000 |
| Absent (%) | 15 (100.0) | 29 (96.7) |
Figure 4Multiplicity of conventional adenomas in patients with and without SPs.
Number of conventional adenomas in each individual is compared between AN+SP and AN-only groups (A), individuals with and without multiple (B), large (C), left-sided (D), and right-sided (E) SPs. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 5Location of conventional adenomas.
Presence and location of conventional adenomas is compared between AN+SP and AN-only groups (A), individuals with and without left-sided SPs (B) and individuals with and without right-sided SPs (C). Statistical analyses were not conducted because of small sample sizes.
Figure 6LINE-1 methylation levels in adjacent mucosa.
Representative results of bisulfite pyrosequencing showing the levels of LINE-1 methylation in adjacent mucosa which was calculated as the mean percentage of the four CpG sites (A and B). Individuals with multiple (C) and large (D) SPs showed significantly lower LINE-1 methylation levels compared to individuals without such SPs. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.