Literature DB >> 24849356

Refractory sampling links efficiency and costs of sensory encoding to stimulus statistics.

Zhuoyi Song1, Mikko Juusola2.   

Abstract

Sensory neurons integrate information about the world, adapting their sampling to its changes. However, little is understood mechanistically how this primary encoding process, which ultimately limits perception, depends upon stimulus statistics. Here, we analyze this open question systematically by using intracellular recordings from fly (Drosophila melanogaster and Coenosia attenuata) photoreceptors and corresponding stochastic simulations from biophysically realistic photoreceptor models. Recordings show that photoreceptors can sample more information from naturalistic light intensity time series (NS) than from Gaussian white-noise (GWN), shuffled-NS or Gaussian-1/f stimuli; integrating larger responses with higher signal-to-noise ratio and encoding efficiency to large bursty contrast changes. Simulations reveal how a photoreceptor's information capture depends critically upon the stochastic refractoriness of its 30,000 sampling units (microvilli). In daylight, refractoriness sacrifices sensitivity to enhance intensity changes in neural image representations, with more and faster microvilli improving encoding. But for GWN and other stimuli, which lack longer dark contrasts of real-world intensity changes that reduce microvilli refractoriness, these performance gains are submaximal and energetically costly. These results provide mechanistic reasons why information sampling is more efficient for natural/naturalistic stimulation and novel insight into the operation, design, and evolution of signaling and code in sensory neurons.
Copyright © 2014 Song and Juusola.

Keywords:  Drosophila; information theory; phototransduction; sampling; stochasticity; vision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24849356      PMCID: PMC4028498          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4463-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  45 in total

1.  Phototransduction in primate cones and blowfly photoreceptors: different mechanisms, different algorithms, similar response.

Authors:  J H van Hateren; H P Snippe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Reliable biological communication with realistic constraints.

Authors:  Gonzalo G de Polavieja
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-12-21

3.  Large functional variability in cockroach photoreceptors: optimization to low light levels.

Authors:  Kyösti Heimonen; Iikka Salmela; Panu Kontiokari; Matti Weckström
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Robustness of neural coding in Drosophila photoreceptors in the absence of slow delayed rectifier K+ channels.

Authors:  Mikko Vähäsöyrinki; Jeremy E Niven; Roger C Hardie; Matti Weckström; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Photoreceptor processing improves salience facilitating small target detection in cluttered scenes.

Authors:  Russell S A Brinkworth; Eng-Leng Mah; Jodi P Gray; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Stimulus history reliably shapes action potential waveforms of cortical neurons.

Authors:  Gonzalo G de Polavieja; Annette Harsch; Ingo Kleppe; Hugh P C Robinson; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Fly photoreceptors demonstrate energy-information trade-offs in neural coding.

Authors:  Jeremy E Niven; John C Anderson; Simon B Laughlin
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Feedback network controls photoreceptor output at the layer of first visual synapses in Drosophila.

Authors:  Lei Zheng; Gonzalo G de Polavieja; Verena Wolfram; Musa H Asyali; Roger C Hardie; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Network adaptation improves temporal representation of naturalistic stimuli in Drosophila eye: I dynamics.

Authors:  Lei Zheng; Anton Nikolaev; Trevor J Wardill; Cahir J O'Kane; Gonzalo G de Polavieja; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Visual coding in locust photoreceptors.

Authors:  Olivier Faivre; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  20 in total

1.  Image statistics of the environment surrounding freely behaving hoverflies.

Authors:  Olga Dyakova; Martin M Müller; Martin Egelhaaf; Karin Nordström
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Vision in dim light: highlights and challenges.

Authors:  David C O'Carroll; Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The remarkable visual capacities of nocturnal insects: vision at the limits with small eyes and tiny brains.

Authors:  Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Effects of phase correlations in naturalistic stimuli on quantitative information coding by fly photoreceptors.

Authors:  Irina I Ignatova; Andrew S French; Roman V Frolov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels Reduce Network Excitability, Improving Adaptability and Energetics for Transmitting and Perceiving Sensory Information.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Li; Ahmad Abou Tayoun; Zhuoyi Song; An Dau; Diana Rien; David Jaciuch; Sidhartha Dongre; Florence Blanchard; Anton Nikolaev; Lei Zheng; Murali K Bollepalli; Brian Chu; Roger C Hardie; Patrick J Dolph; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Microsaccadic sampling of moving image information provides Drosophila hyperacute vision.

Authors:  Mikko Juusola; An Dau; Zhuoyi Song; Narendra Solanki; Diana Rien; David Jaciuch; Sidhartha Anil Dongre; Florence Blanchard; Gonzalo G de Polavieja; Roger C Hardie; Jouni Takalo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Speed and sensitivity of phototransduction in Drosophila depend on degree of saturation of membrane phospholipids.

Authors:  Alex S Randall; Che-Hsiung Liu; Brian Chu; Qifeng Zhang; Sidharta A Dongre; Mikko Juusola; Kristian Franze; Michael J O Wakelam; Roger C Hardie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Modelling the mechanoreceptor's dynamic behaviour.

Authors:  Zhuoyi Song; Robert W Banks; Guy S Bewick
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Electrophysiological Method for Recording Intracellular Voltage Responses of Drosophila Photoreceptors and Interneurons to Light Stimuli In Vivo.

Authors:  Mikko Juusola; An Dau; Lei Zheng; Diana Rien
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Evidence for Dynamic Network Regulation of Drosophila Photoreceptor Function from Mutants Lacking the Neurotransmitter Histamine.

Authors:  An Dau; Uwe Friederich; Sidhartha Dongre; Xiaofeng Li; Murali K Bollepalli; Roger C Hardie; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.