Literature DB >> 29537919

Effects of phase correlations in naturalistic stimuli on quantitative information coding by fly photoreceptors.

Irina I Ignatova1, Andrew S French2, Roman V Frolov1.   

Abstract

Natural visual scenes are rarely random. Instead, intensity and wavelength change slowly in time and space over many regions of the scene, so that neighboring temporal and spatial visual inputs are more correlated and contain less information than truly random signals. It has been suggested that sensory optimization to match these higher order correlations (HOC) occurs at the earliest visual stages, and that photoreceptors can process temporal natural signals more efficiently than random signals. We tested this early-stage hypothesis by comparing the information content of Calliphora vicina photoreceptor responses to naturalistic inputs before and after removing HOC by randomizing phase. Forty different, 60-s long, naturalistic sequences (NS) were used, together with randomized-phase versions of the same sequences to give pink noise (PN) so that each input pair had identical means, variances, mean contrasts, and power spectra. We measured the information content of inputs and membrane potential responses by three different methods: coherence, mutual information, and compression entropy. We also used entropy and phase statistics of each pair as measures of HOC. Responses to randomized signals generally had higher gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and information rates than responses to NS. Information rate increased with a strong, positive, linear correlation to phase randomization within sequence pairs. This was confirmed by varying the degree of phase randomization. Our data indicate that individual photoreceptors encode input information by Weber's law, with HOC within natural sequences reducing information transfer by decreasing the number of local contrast events that exceed the noise-imposed threshold. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Natural visual scenes feature statistical regularities, or higher order correlations (HOC), both in time and space, to encode surfaces, textures, and object boundaries. Visual systems rely on this information; however, it remains controversial whether individual photoreceptors can discriminate and enhance information encoded in HOC. Here we show that the more HOC the stimulus contains, the lower the information transfer rate of photoreceptors. We explain our findings by applying the Weber's paradigm of differential signal perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calliphora vicina; blowfly; higher order correlations; natural stimulus; photoreceptor

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29537919      PMCID: PMC6032113          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00017.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  The metabolic cost of neural information.

Authors:  S B Laughlin; R R de Ruyter van Steveninck; J C Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Not flying blind: a comparative study of photoreceptor function in flying and non-flying cockroaches.

Authors:  Roman V Frolov; Atsuko Matsushita; Kentaro Arikawa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Spatial Correlations in Natural Scenes Modulate Response Reliability in Mouse Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Rajeev V Rikhye; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The frequency response, coherence, and information capacity of two neuronal models.

Authors:  R B Stein; A S French; A V Holden
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Design principles of insect and vertebrate visual systems.

Authors:  Joshua R Sanes; S Lawrence Zipursky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Light-induced voltage noise in the photoreceptor of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C F Wu; W L Pak
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 7.  Wiring visual systems: common and divergent mechanisms and principles.

Authors:  Alex L Kolodkin; P Robin Hiesinger
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  A novel estimator for the rate of information transfer by continuous signals.

Authors:  Jouni Takalo; Irina Ignatova; Matti Weckström; Mikko Vähäsöyrinki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Static and Dynamic Adaptation of Insect Photoreceptor Responses to Naturalistic Stimuli.

Authors:  Andrew S French; Esa-Ville Immonen; Roman V Frolov
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Fly Photoreceptors Encode Phase Congruency.

Authors:  Uwe Friederich; Stephen A Billings; Roger C Hardie; Mikko Juusola; Daniel Coca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Changes in electrophysiological properties of photoreceptors in Periplaneta americana associated with the loss of screening pigment.

Authors:  Paulus Saari; Esa-Ville Immonen; Joni Kemppainen; Kyösti Heimonen; Marianna Zhukovskaya; Ekaterina Novikova; Andrew S French; Päivi H Torkkeli; Hongxia Liu; Roman V Frolov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Speed of phototransduction in the microvillus regulates the accuracy and bandwidth of the rhabdomeric photoreceptor.

Authors:  Roman V Frolov; Irina I Ignatova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.