Nasir Malik1, Xiantao Wang1, Sonia Shah1, Anastasia G Efthymiou1, Bin Yan2, Sabrina Heman-Ackah1, Ming Zhan3, Mahendra Rao4. 1. National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America. 2. Hong Kong Baptist University, Department of Biology, Hong Kong. 3. The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas, United States of America. 4. National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America; National Institutes of Health, NIH Center for Regenerative Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Abstract
Astrocytes are the most abundant cell type in the central nervous system (CNS) and have a multitude of functions that include maintenance of CNS homeostasis, trophic support of neurons, detoxification, and immune surveillance. It has only recently been appreciated that astrocyte dysfunction is a primary cause of many neurological disorders. Despite their importance in disease very little is known about global gene expression for human astrocytes. We have performed a microarray expression analysis of human fetal astrocytes to identify genes and signaling pathways that are important for astrocyte development and maintenance. Our analysis confirmed that the fetal astrocytes express high levels of the core astrocyte marker GFAP and the transcription factors from the NFI family which have been shown to play important roles in astrocyte development. A group of novel markers were identified that distinguish fetal astrocytes from pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) and NSC-derived neurons. As in murine astrocytes, the Notch signaling pathway appears to be particularly important for cell fate decisions between the astrocyte and neuronal lineages in human astrocytes. These findings unveil the repertoire of genes expressed in human astrocytes and serve as a basis for further studies to better understand astrocyte biology, especially as it relates to disease.
Astrocytes are the most abundant cell type in the central nervous system (CNS) and have a multitude of functions that include maintenance of CNS homeostasis, trophic support of neurons, detoxification, and immune surveillance. It has only recently been appreciated that astrocyte dysfunction is a primary cause of many neurological disorders. Despite their importance in disease very little is known about global gene expression for human astrocytes. We have performed a microarray expression analysis of human fetal astrocytes to identify genes and signaling pathways that are important for astrocyte development and maintenance. Our analysis confirmed that the fetal astrocytes express high levels of the core astrocyte marker GFAP and the transcription factors from the NFI family which have been shown to play important roles in astrocyte development. A group of novel markers were identified that distinguish fetal astrocytes from pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) and NSC-derived neurons. As in murine astrocytes, the Notch signaling pathway appears to be particularly important for cell fate decisions between the astrocyte and neuronal lineages in human astrocytes. These findings unveil the repertoire of genes expressed in human astrocytes and serve as a basis for further studies to better understand astrocyte biology, especially as it relates to disease.
Astrocytes are process-bearing glial cells that comprise at least 20–25% and possibly up to 50% of the total volume in some regions of the central nervous system (CNS). They play an integral role in normal homeostasis of the adult brain providing trophic support to neurons and oligodendrocytes as well as degrading potential toxins. Amongst many other functions, astrocytes have important roles in glutamate biology, axonal guidance, the inflammatory response and wound healing, formation of the blood brain barrier, iron metabolism, and myelination [1]. Because astrocytes have such diverse functions it is not surprising that they have been implicated in many human diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, and Parkinson's disease [2].A great deal of progress has been made in understanding astrocyte development in recent years. Like all other neural cells in the CNS, astrocytes develop from multipotent neuroepithelial cells or neural stem cells (NSCs). Neuronal formation precedes gliogenesis in the course of normal development. Studies of astrocyte development have revealed that the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2), signal transducer and activators of transcription (STAT), heregulin, and NOTCH signaling pathways are critical for proper formation of this cell type with considerable cross-talk between these pathways [3]–[7]. BMPs activate basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) factors from the ID and HES families to repress proneural bHLH factors and initiate gliogenesis [8]. It is believed that this differentiation program is locked into place by induction of the neuronal restrictive silencing factor (NRSF) which inhibits neurogenesis and promotes gliogenesis [9]. Studies also suggest that the transcription factor NFIA is critical for the initiation of gliogenesis by inducing expression of the Notch effector HES5 [10]. NFIA expression in turn is regulated by SOX9 which complexes with NFIA to turn on a gliogenesis transcriptional program [11]. When overexpressed in glioma cells, NFIX, a paralog of NFIA, has also been shown to regulate astrocyte maturation by activating expression of several genes found in mature astrocytes [12]. Mouse knock-out studies have not been completely conclusive about the role of NFI and SOX genes in gliogenesis because of redundancy in these gene families but they do suggest that SOX9 and NFIA have a role in glial, particularly astroglial, development [13]–[14]. Another pathway that has been shown to have a critical role is gliogenesis is the MAPK pathway which can regulate differentiation of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes through MEK activation [15]. It is likely that there is additional crosstalk between the transcription factors and signaling pathways described above that has yet to be elucidated.Cell culture models in which NSCs are differentiated to astrocytes and subsequent global gene expression analysis of a homogeneous population of cells can help identify new genes that are pivotal for astrogenesis. These types of analyses can also offer insights into the transcriptome of mature astrocytes and will be particularly useful for studying human astrocytes. Previously microarray data has only been available for murine astrocytes and human glial precursors [16]–[17]. We have recently published a paper describing a new method for the differentiation of astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) using heregulin-β1 and performed a time-course microarray analysis from days 14–35 of astrocyte differentiation [18]. In this current study we have expanded the array datasets to include comparisons of human fetal astrocytes from two commercial suppliers comparing our results with those of the previous studies to identify genes and signaling pathways that are critical for astrocyte maturation and function. The availability of this data will make it possible to test and verify predictions about the importance of specific pathways and genes in astrocyte development and biology. Additionally, the data offers a new series of potential unique astrocyte markers that can be used to ascertain the purity of astrocyte populations that are differentiated from NSCs. Such information will be particularly useful for the large scale production of homogeneous astrocyte cultures for high throughput drug screens and for understanding neurological disorders resulting from astrocyte dysfunction.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
Astrocytes from human fetal cortex were purchased from Lonza (Walkersville, MD USA) and ScienCell (Carlsbad, CA USA) and grown according to manufacturer's instructions. The Lonza astrocytes were grown on uncoated tissue culture plates in Lonza's Astrocyte basal medium with L-glutamine, gentamicin, 3% FBS and supplemented with Lonza's astrocyte growth medium SingleQuots (ascorbic acid, EGF, insulin). The cells were passaged with trypsin/EDTA once they reached 80% confluence. ScienCell astrocytes were grown on poly-L-lysine coated plates in the company's astrocyte medium and passaged with trypsin/EDTA once the plates were 80% confluent.NSCs used in this study were either derived from human PSCs using an embryoid body (EB) intermediate as previously described [19], derived by direct induction [20], or purchased from Life Technologies and cultured in StemPro NSC SFM medium ((Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). The direct induction protocol utilizes a Neural Induction medium (Life Technologies) in which PSCs are initially seeded at a low density and grown for one week to become neuroepithelial cells, then switched over to a neural expansion medium (Life Technologies) for generation of NSCs that can be passaged and cryopreserved. Once the NSC lines were established they were grown in StemPro NSC SFM consisting of KO-DMEM/F12, StemPro Neural Supplements, 20 ng/ml FGF2, and 20 ng/ml EGF (all from Life Technologies). The differentiated neurons used in this study were derived from iPSC-derived NSCs with neuronal differentiation medium as previously described [21] and iPSC-derived astrocytes used in this study were generated with a slight modification of previously described astrocyte differentiation medium [18] consisting of DMEM/F12, GlutaMAX-I, B27 supplement, 8 ng/ml FGF2, and 10 ng/ml of heregulin-β1 (all components from Life Technologies except heregulin which was from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ USA).
Immunofluorescence
Cells were processed for staining by fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature followed by three washes in PBS. They were then incubated in blocking buffer containing 10% goat serum, 0.1% Triton-X, and 1% bovineserum albumin for 30 minutes followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with primary antibodies in blocking buffer. Primary antibodies used in this are described in Table S1. After removal of primary antibody the cells were washed with PBS three times and incubated with Alexa fluor secondary antibodies and Hoechst in blocking buffer (1∶500 for Alexa and 1∶2000 for Hoechst, both from Life Technologies) for two hours at room temperature. Staining was visualized on a fluorescence microscope with the appropriate filter settings.
Bead array hybridization
The Lonza astrocytes were grown in a T75 to 80% confluence and cells collected for microarray hybridization after the first passage. Astrocytes from ScienCell were grown in a 6 cm cell culture dish, passaged once into a T75, grown to 80% confluence and collected for microarray hybridization. Pelleted cells were sent to Qiagen (Frederick, MD USA) for extraction, amplification, labeling and hybridization of RNA to an Illumina HT-12 v4 BeadChip array. The.idat files for the arrays were sent to us for analysis.
Bead array analysis
The Gene Expression module of the Illumina GenomeStudio software package was used to process the.idat files. The data were normalized with background subtraction and scatter plots and dendrograms were generated. The data were exported to Excel for further “cleaning” by removing any probes in which the intensity value was <50 for all samples and all intensity values less than 1 were converted to 1. Expression fold changes for each commercial astrocyte sample compared to an NSC sample were calculated and only those genes which showed greater than 5-fold changes in expression were considered as cell-type specific markers. Gene lists from relevant developmental pathways, all human transcription factors, and growth factors and their receptors were interrogated against this dataset. This dataset was also analyzed for expression of genes found to be enriched in other astrocyte gene expression studies and from an array dataset generated from neurons differentiated from iPSC-derived NSCs [16], [18], [21].
Transcription factor binding site analysis
We employed PWMSCAN to predict binding sites of TFs [22] This method performs computational identification of the binding sites by scanning promoter sequences using PWMs (Position Weight Matrices) of TF binding motifs. The predicted binding site is then evaluated by the P value, which is calculated through a permutation-based method, FastPval [23]. A sequence hit with P-value less than the user specified cutoff is considered as a putative binding site. Moreover, the putative binding sites can be further filtered based on conservation scores between human and mouse genomes, which are evaluated by another permutation-based test. In this study, we scanned three promoter regions: 1) −500 bp (upstream to TSS) ∼ +100 bp (downstream to TSS); 2) −2000 bp ∼ −500 bp; 3) −8000 bp ∼ +2000 bp, which were downloaded from the UCSC genome browser. We retrieved PWMs of TFs available from two databases TRANSFAC and Jaspar.
Inhibition of NOTCH signaling with DAPT
For Notch pathway inhibition ∼100,000 NSCs were plated onto poly-L-ornithine/laminin-coated 24-well plates. The next day cells were either grown in NSC medium or the medium was changed to either neuronal differentiation medium or astrocyte differentiation medium. The Notch pathway inhibitor DAPT (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO USA) was added to the medium at a concentration of 10 μM. The cells were grown for an additional four days with medium changes every other day and then processed for immunofluorescence for the neuronal marker beta-III-tubulin and the astrocyte marker GFAP. Beta-III-tubulin positive cells were quantified by calculating the number of positive cells in three separate fields of view. A t-test was performed to assess statistical significance between samples.
Lentiviral infection
cDNAs for NFIX and HOPX in second generation lentiviral vectors were purchased form Thermo Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA USA). A control GFP lentiviral cDNA was used as well. One million NSCs plated in three wells of a 6-well plate were infected at an MOI of 10 and three days later cells were either maintained in NSC medium or switched to astrocyte or neuronal differentiation medium. Two days after the medium change the cells were analyzed qPCR for NSC, astrocyte, and neuronal markers with beta-actin as a normalization control. Lonza astrocytes were similarly infected and analyzed by qPCR three days after infection. Total RNA from GFP-control, HOPX-, and NFIX-lentivirus infected cells was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, CA). cDNA was generated from 1 µg total RNA using SuperScript III First -Strand Synthesis System kit (Life Technologies, CA). The β-actin gene was employed as an endogenous control to normalize input cDNA. qPCR reactions was performed on the Applied Biosystems ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR Sytsem (Applied Biosystems, CA) using Fast SYBR Green Master Mix Kit (Life Technologies, CA). The comparative C method was used to determine the relative target mRNA quantity in samples. The primers used are described in Table S2.
Results
Characterizing fetal astrocyte and iPSC-derived NSCs samples used for microarray analysis
In an effort to identify genes involved in regulating astrocyte development we examined the expression profile of fetal astrocytes obtained from Lonza and ScienCell and compared their expression profile to NSC lines derived from both an iPSC line by direct induction (hereafter referred to as NCRM-5 NSCs) and NSCs purchased from Life Technologies that were derived via an embryoid body (EB) based rosette method from the human H9 embryonic stem cell line (H9 NSCs). Gene expression data from previous microarray experiments indicated that NSC lines derived by either the EB/rosette or direct induction method have very similar gene expression profiles [20]. Prior to microarray hybridization the NSCs were examined for expression of the NSC marker Nestin and nearly all PSC-derived NSCs were Nestin+ (Figure 1A). Fetal astrocytes expressed GFAP, a characteristic marker of astrocytes, and showed clear differences in morphology from one another (Figure 1B) which likely reflects their distinct cell culture propagation, passage number, and isolation. Nevertheless, these cells did not show expression of NSC markers such as Sox1, and there was no neuronal contamination as assessed by β-III tubulin staining (data not shown).
Figure 1
Characterization of NSC and fetal astrocyte samples.
(A) NCRM-5 iPSC derived NSCs and H9 ESC derived NSCs were examined for Nestin expression (green) which was overplayed with Hoechst nuclear stain (blue) to show all cells, (B) Lonza fet ast (fetal astrocytes) and Sciencell fet ast (fetal astrocytes) were examined for GFAP expression (green) which was overplayed with Hoechst nuclear stain (blue) to show all cells, (C) dendrogram showing relationship between NSCs and fetal astrocytes at the global gene expression level and a table showing correlation coefficients amongst all samples.
Characterization of NSC and fetal astrocyte samples.
(A) NCRM-5 iPSC derived NSCs and H9 ESC derived NSCs were examined for Nestin expression (green) which was overplayed with Hoechst nuclear stain (blue) to show all cells, (B) Lonza fet ast (fetal astrocytes) and Sciencell fet ast (fetal astrocytes) were examined for GFAP expression (green) which was overplayed with Hoechst nuclear stain (blue) to show all cells, (C) dendrogram showing relationship between NSCs and fetal astrocytes at the global gene expression level and a table showing correlation coefficients amongst all samples.The NSCs and fetal astrocytes were hybridized to an Illumina bead-chip array. Overall ∼14,000 genes were expressed above an intensity threshold of 50 in at least one of the three samples. This threshold was chosen based on our previous experience which suggested that genes expressed at intensity levels below 50 were too variable to consider in an analysis. The dataset has been deposited an is publicly available (GSE53404). Prior to gene expression analysis, dendrograms were generated to compare each of the respective fetal astrocyte samples to NSCs and to each other (Figure 1B). Despite differences in cell culture propagation both fetal astrocytes samples had a high degree of similarity to each other at the global gene expression level (R2 = 0.94) and formed a cluster distinct from NSCs (Figure 1C). Likewise, the two NSC lines had high correlation coefficients (0.95) whereas the fetal astrocyte and NSC samples were more dissimilar (0.86–0.90).
Identification of fetal astrocyte-marker genes
We reasoned that if a gene was highly upregulated (at least 5-fold) in two astrocyte samples grown under different conditions compared to both of the NSC samples it would likely be a reliable candidate as an astrocyte marker. Therefore, we used this cut-off to identify new markers that are unique to this cell type. A total of 350 genes were expressed at least 5-fold higher in both fetal astrocyte samples in pairwise comparisons to the two NSC samples (Table S3). Astrocytes play important roles in immune regulation, wound healing, and modulation of the brain's vascular system and a DAVID Gene Ontology search [24] indicates that genes in these categories are amongst those most overrepresented of the genes that are at least 5-fold upregulated in fetal astrocytes (Table 1). The DAVID search also revealed that the MAPK pathway may play a critical role in fetal astrocytes which is in line with recent evidence that this pathway is important for gliogenesis to proceed [15].
Table 1
DAVID GO term analysis of genes enriched 5-fold in Lonza and ScienCell fetal astrocytes.
TERM
p-value
# GENES
Antigen processing
2.70E-08
8
Extracellular matrix
9.90E-07
22
Blood vessel development
1.50E-06
19
Cell adhesion
2.20E-05
17
Wound healing
8.50E-05
14
Secreted
1.30E-04
49
Inflammation
6.50E-04
8
Cell motion
1.10E-03
21
Apoptosis regulation
2.10E-03
29
MAPK activity
3.90E-03
8
In a further attempt to find genes that are most likely to be astrocyte-specific we tried to eliminate the effects of variables inherent in using primary samples by comparing the list against other datasets that we have generated. These datasets were from additional NSC lines [20], three astrocyte line differentiated from iPSC-derived NSCs (one from this study and two described in ref. 18) as well as cortical neurons differentiated from iPSC-derived NSCs (described ref 21). The array expression data for NSCs, NSC-derived neurons and astrocytes generated in this study has been publicly deposited (GSE55379). The 350 genes that were 5-fold overexpressed in fetal astrocytes were cross-checked for being expressed in the three NSC-derived astrocyte lines and either being absent from or expressed at low abundance in the other two NSC lines and in differentiated neurons. A total of 24 genes met these stringent criteria (Table 2). The list of genes includes the classical astrocyte marker GFAP and the transcription factor NFIX which is a paralog of NFIA which is known to be critical for gliogenesis [10]. Other genes of interest in this group include the transcriptional regulators LMO2, LHX2, HOPX, and PRRX1 as well as genes such as BEND6, CDKN2B, IGFBP7, LGALS3, and MVP that have known or predicted roles in signaling pathways, including NOTCH and TGF-beta, that are known to be important in astrocyte function [25]–[29].
Table 2
Gene highly enriched in both fetal astrocyte samples and expressed at very low levels in NSCs or differentiated neurons.
SYMBOL
LONZA FET AST
SCIENCELL FET AST
NCRM-5 NSC
H9 NSC
BEND6
216
308
3
10
CD44
3920
4352
145
233
CDKN2B
1141
440
13
17
COBL
100
399
17
7
CRYAB
1305
1230
7
1
DUSP23
1004
432
11
11
GFAP
3280
1456
8
1
HEY1
727
805
114
29
HOPX
1309
1417
210
1
IGFBP7
1487
1623
31
18
ITGA3
1056
1039
88
88
LGALS3
3055
1599
52
2
LHX2
4177
4542
2
16
LMO2
360
1674
6
1
LPPR4
431
537
1
1
MVP
266
323
16
6
NFIX
4122
1730
4
1
PRRX1
286
828
1
4
S100A6
3500
2917
40
28
SLC25A18
623
303
4
5
SYNC1
1084
395
32
8
TDRD7
264
292
5
8
TGFB3
959
156
15
10
TM4SF1
643
589
20
105
We selected three transcription factors from this list to validate expression at the protein level in fetal astrocytes. LHX2, HOPX, and PRRX1 were found to be present in both fetal astrocyte lines (Figure 2A–C) and absent in NSCs by immunofluorescence (data not shown). This suggests that the genes are excellent novel marker candidates for astrocyte.
Figure 2
HOPX, LHX2, and PRRX1 staining of fetal astrocytes.
Lonza and Sciencell fet ast (fetal astrocytes) were stained with HOPX (A), LHX2 (B), and PRRX1 (C) antibodies. The antibody signal is in green and is overplayed with HOECHST (blue) to show all cells.
HOPX, LHX2, and PRRX1 staining of fetal astrocytes.
Lonza and Sciencell fet ast (fetal astrocytes) were stained with HOPX (A), LHX2 (B), and PRRX1 (C) antibodies. The antibody signal is in green and is overplayed with HOECHST (blue) to show all cells.
Analysis of pathways critical for astrocyte development and maintenance
Transcription factors and signaling pathways such as NOTCH, TGF-beta, MAP kinase, and growth factor mediated pathways have been shown to play important roles in astrocyte biology. We examined each of these pathways in greater depth in our fetal astrocyte array data. Table 3 summarizes number of genes expressed and differential expression (2-fold difference) of genes amongst these pathways in fetal astrocytes and NSCs.
Table 3
Summary pathways analyzed in microarray.
Pathway
# Genes
Expressed 2/2 fet ast
Expressed 2/2 NSC
Up 2/2 fet ast
Down 2/2 fet ast
Transcription factors
1900
802
799
46
51
Notch
95
54
45
9
1
TGF-beta
135
54
48
5
3
JAK/STAT
206
55
49
6
4
MAPK
536
224
220
20
15
Growth factors
377
88
64
18
3
Growth factor receptors
63
15
18
3
3
Transcription factors
In order to generate a list of transcription factors (TFs) expressed in fetal astrocytes we interrogated our datasets against a list of all human TFs (Table S4). Table 4 displays the 46 transcription factors that are upregulated in both fetal astrocyte samples in pairwise comparisons to both NSC samples. Transcription factors in this list include the previously mentioned HOPX, PRRX1, and NFIX. Other TFs that appear to be enriched in both fetal and NSC-derived astrocytes include BHLHB2, the NOTCH effector HEY1 and the NFIX paralogs NFIA and NFIB. The remaining transcription factors appear to be more specific to fetal astrocytes. Specifically interesting ones include EMX2, FOXG1, and OTX1 all of which are known to have region specific expression in the rostral forebrain [30], [31]. Curiously the fourth member of the NFI family NFIC is enriched in fetal astrocytes but not expressed in NSC-derived astrocyte or the NSC-derived neuronal sample (this study and [18]).
Table 4
Transcription factors upregulated in both sets of fetal astrocytes compared to both NSC samples.
SYMBOL
LONZA FET AST
SCIENCELL FET AST
NCRM-5 NSC
H9 NSC
BCL6
280
406
54
24
BHLHB2
1233
1069
114
1
BHLHB3
145
187
2
1
CSDC2
425
189
33
21
CXXC5
3189
1658
625
715
DPF3
267
149
11
1
EGR1
3970
3779
1197
443
EMX2
763
311
11
4
ETS2
207
114
23
24
FOS
606
3343
198
63
FOXG1
547
1021
1
14
GLIPR1
850
854
4
64
GLIS3
162
157
68
48
GTF2F2
4033
3423
1437
1564
HEY1
727
805
114
29
HOPX
1309
1417
210
1
ID1
708
389
166
8
IRF9
1394
735
260
168
JUN
2010
1435
605
672
KLF5
165
275
14
7
KLF6
874
879
302
406
KLF9
724
616
132
2
LHX2
4177
4542
2
16
MBNL1
370
504
114
159
NFE2L3
705
200
44
93
NFIA
335
343
80
1
NFIB
5565
3405
1012
287
NFIC
242
175
9
7
NFIX
4122
1730
4
1
NR2E1
529
776
13
8
OTX1
183
100
1
10
PRDM16
161
113
8
3
PRRX1
286
828
1
4
RBM20
133
320
62
12
RUNX2
157
169
29
67
ZBTB20
450
943
72
81
ZBTB4
824
818
303
275
ZC3HAV1
312
291
135
121
ZFP3
202
212
19
9
ZFP36
218
333
69
102
ZNF135
368
216
41
38
ZNF385D
387
101
39
2
PHF11
638
512
9
2
PHF15
152
199
18
7
SETD6
196
129
16
23
SMARCA2
897
1052
238
188
Table 5 lists the 52 transcription factors downregulated in fetal astrocytes compared to NSCs. Genes in this list included the previously identified NSC marker MYCN, SALL4, LIN28, and LIN28B which are all well-known markers for other stem cell populations [32]–[34].
Table 5
Transcription factors upregulated in both sets of NSC samples compared to both fetal astrocytes.
SYMBOL
LONZA FET AST
SCIENCELL FET AST
NCRM-5 NSC
H9 NSC
ARID3B
72
33
431
737
CBX2
155
80
695
494
CHD7
277
388
2277
1863
CHX10
1
16
204
108
CXXC4
51
51
827
287
CXXC6
17
26
200
220
E2F2
210
301
1064
834
EBF1
19
1
146
146
ETV4
36
54
217
143
EZH2
204
253
740
533
FLI1
32
13
177
501
GLI2
71
48
189
176
H1FX
268
297
629
606
HES6
551
527
3211
1653
HIC2
153
77
800
1039
IRX2
70
23
410
2254
IRX5
48
29
458
342
KNTC1
372
473
1495
1122
LIN28
1
1
276
1218
LIN28B
1
6
649
1955
MYCN
74
90
1299
785
MYST3
643
621
1624
1489
PBX2
104
144
327
299
PHF16
106
101
350
332
PKNOX2
141
102
751
304
PLAGL2
182
237
536
532
POU3F2
839
944
3439
2596
PRDM8
22
36
2559
108
RAPGEF5
22
17
146
108
RCOR2
57
43
1187
663
SALL2
597
541
2225
1498
SALL4
39
17
458
1024
SORBS2
176
177
1337
2257
SOX3
351
75
3147
1629
STAT5B
75
44
151
172
SUV420H1
140
111
307
285
TCF7L1
13
17
184
104
TRIT1
382
380
879
857
ZBTB34
53
47
174
175
ZBTB39
41
22
116
85
ZBTB46
56
3
263
350
ZFHX3
181
212
479
745
ZFP14
26
5
108
52
ZMYND8
114
114
415
361
ZNF138
33
34
114
96
ZNF219
157
193
987
761
ZNF431
47
30
108
95
ZNF443
30
44
138
105
ZNF462
429
402
1759
1220
ZNF679
450
425
1167
1551
ZNF696
115
83
256
266
A subset of transcriptional regulators that was examined was genes involved with chromatin dynamics (Table S5). Six chromatin binding genes were upregulated and nine downregulated in both sets of fetal astrocytes. Of the genes upregulated in fetal astrocytes SMARCA2 and SETD6 were similarly regulated in NSC-derived astrocytes. SMARCA2 but not SETD6 was upregulated in NSC-derived neurons relative to NSCs. Several members of this gene group were also downregulated in both fetal and NSC-derived astrocytes including ARID3A, ARID3B, and EZH2. Each of these genes was also downregulated in NSC-derived neurons.
Signaling pathway analysis of microarray data
Four signaling pathways that are critical for astrocyte development are NOTCH, TGF-beta, JAK-STAT, and the MAP kinase pathways. We analyzed each of these pathways in our array dataset (Table S6–S9). We also examined growth factors and growth factor receptor expression (Table S10).
NOTCH Pathway
For the NOTCH pathway nine genes are upregulated in both fetal astrocyte samples and only one gene is downregulated (Figure 3A). Amongst the upregulated genes HEY1 and the atypical ligands DLK1 and DNER are similarly upregulated in NSC-derived astrocytes. HEY1 seems to be relatively astrocyte specific as it is expressed at low levels in differentiated neurons while DLK1 and DNER show robust expression in neurons. The only NOTCH gene downregulated in fetal astrocytes relative to NSCs is NOTCH3 but it does not show similar regulation in comparisons between NSCs and NSC-derived and astrocytes. Despite the fact that there is more upregulation of selected members of the NOTCH pathway in fetal astrocytes, most of the components of the canonical NOTCH pathway are present NSCs, fetal, and NSC-derived astrocytes and neurons suggesting the pathway is active in all these cells but perhaps utilized in different manners.
Figure 3
Heatmaps for differentially expressed genes from (A) NOTCH, (B) TGF-beta, and (C) JAK-STAT pathways.
Heatmaps are shown for genes differentially expressed between Lonza fetal astrocytes (LON FET AST), Sciencell fetal astrocytes (SC FET AST), H9 NSCs, and NCRM-5 NSCs. All genes show at least 2-fold difference between at least one fetal astrocyte and NSC sample.
Heatmaps for differentially expressed genes from (A) NOTCH, (B) TGF-beta, and (C) JAK-STAT pathways.
Heatmaps are shown for genes differentially expressed between Lonza fetal astrocytes (LON FET AST), Sciencell fetal astrocytes (SC FET AST), H9 NSCs, and NCRM-5 NSCs. All genes show at least 2-fold difference between at least one fetal astrocyte and NSC sample.
TGF-beta pathway
A total of five genes in the TGF-beta pathway are upregulated and three downregulated in both fetal astrocyte samples (Figure 3B). None of the genes upregulated in fetal astrocytes is similarly regulated in NSC-derived astrocytes although two of the downregulated genes (BMP7, TGFBR3) are downregulated in NSC-derived astrocytes. TGFBR3 is a negative regulator of the TGF-beta pathway so this along with the other array results suggest this pathway is less active in NSCs [35]. It should be noted the TGF-beta pathway seems to be very active in Lonza fetal astrocytes as eight additional genes in this pathway were upregulated only in this sample. These cells appear capable of signaling through BMP2/4, GDF10, and TGFB2/3 whereas Sciencell astrocytes only signal through TGFB 2/3. NSC-derived astrocytes do not seem to actively signal via any of these ligands except perhaps TGFB1 which is expressed at low levels.
JAK/STAT Pathway
Six genes from the JAK/STAT pathway are upregulated in fetal astrocytes and four are downregulated (Figure 3C). Cytokines appear to be upregulated while several growth factor receptors (LIFR, CNTFR) are downregulated in fetal astrocytes. This appears to be unique to the fetal astrocytes as none of these are similarly regulated or in the case of many of the upregulated cytokines even expressed in NSC-derived astrocytes. It is noteworthy that the LIF and CNTF receptors are both upregulated in the NSCs with the latter not even being expressed in fetal astrocytes but only the LIF ligand is expressed in any of these samples and it is found only in Lonza fetal astrocytes. Many of the other signaling and downstream components of the JAK/STAT pathway (JAKs, STATs, IRFs, TYKs) are found in fetal astrocytes and NSC-derived astrocytes and neurons suggesting the pathway is active in these cells as well.
MAPK Pathway
When examining the MAPK pathway a total of 20 genes are upregulated and 15 downregulated in fetal astrocytes (Figure 4). Genes that are upregulated include a receptor tyrosine phosphatase implicated in brain function (PTPRE), IRS2, and the dual specificity phosphatase DUSP18 [36]. GO analysis and the relatively large number of upregulated genes in this pathway suggest that MAPK signaling is critical for maintenance of fetal astrocytes.
Figure 4
Heatmaps for differentially expressed genes from MAPK pathway.
Heatmaps are shown for genes differentially expressed between Lonza fetal astrocytes (LON FET AST), Sciencell fetal astrocytes (SC FET AST), H9 NSCs, and NCRM-5 NSCs. All genes show at least 2-fold difference between at least one fetal astrocyte and NSC sample.
Heatmaps for differentially expressed genes from MAPK pathway.
Heatmaps are shown for genes differentially expressed between Lonza fetal astrocytes (LON FET AST), Sciencell fetal astrocytes (SC FET AST), H9 NSCs, and NCRM-5 NSCs. All genes show at least 2-fold difference between at least one fetal astrocyte and NSC sample.
Growth factors and growth factor receptors
Eighteen growth factors and three growth factor receptors are upregulated in fetal astrocytes whereas only three of each is downregulated in this cell type relative to NSCs (Figure 5). As described above many of the upregulated genes are ligands of the TGF-beta family. Additionally many cytokines are also upregulated in fetal astrocytes. The PDGRA and MET genes are also upregulated in fetal astrocytes which is particularly interesting because of the potential cross-talk between these receptors [37]. It is possible PDGF signaling is important in fetal astrocytes as the PDGF ligand PDGFC and PDGFD are also expressed.
Figure 5
Heatmaps for genes differentially expressed growth factor and growth factor receptor genes.
Heatmaps are shown for genes differentially expressed between Lonza fetal astrocytes (LON FET AST), Sciencell fetal astrocytes (SC FET AST), H9 NSCs, and NCRM-5 NSCs. All genes show at least 2-fold difference between at least one fetal astrocyte and NSC sample.
Heatmaps for genes differentially expressed growth factor and growth factor receptor genes.
Heatmaps are shown for genes differentially expressed between Lonza fetal astrocytes (LON FET AST), Sciencell fetal astrocytes (SC FET AST), H9 NSCs, and NCRM-5 NSCs. All genes show at least 2-fold difference between at least one fetal astrocyte and NSC sample.
Transcription factor binding site analysis of transcription factors overexpressed in astrocytes
There were several structural genes that were highly enriched in our dataset. We examined sequences up to 8 kb upstream of the translation start site for five of these genes (GFAP, CD44, LGALS3, DUSP23, and S100A6) to determine what transcription factors bound all of these genes and were also expressed in both fetal astrocyte samples (Table 6). The 24 genes meeting these criteria included E2F2 and TCF7L2 which were identified as being important for gliogenesis in mice [38], and NFIC, SMAD3, and two STAT genes all of which are known to have critical roles in astrocyte development. Additionally, conditional knock-out of mouseserum response factor (SRF) in NSCs resulted in significant loss of astrocytes in the mouse brain [39]. The fact that these genes were identified suggests that some of the other genes in this group may have an important role in astrocyte development and maintenance.
Table 6
Transcription factors that are expressed in both fetal astrocyte samples and have binding sites within 8-enriched structural genes.
SYMBOL
LONZA FET AST
SCIENCELL FET AST
NCRM-5 NSC
H9 NSC
ATF1
180
205
151
268
CREB1
1272
1269
1593
1619
E2F2
210
301
1064
834
E2F3
884
1095
1633
1570
EGR1
3970
3779
1197
443
GABPA
130
137
184
121
HBP1
319
177
220
170
LEF1
1122
219
6
222
NFIC
242
175
9
7
NFKB1
1176
684
591
878
RXRA
379
291
464
446
SMAD3
1171
444
687
611
SP1
232
302
387
343
SRF
1655
843
1415
1051
STAT1
703
627
487
353
STAT3
538
369
491
399
TCF3
622
819
1309
1159
TCF7L2
133
182
267
269
TGIF1
221
182
247
258
ZFP161
285
132
371
336
ZNF187
191
161
142
102
ZNF281
457
703
707
924
ZNF410
756
665
775
742
Inhibition of NOTCH signaling in NSCs
Due to the previous work indicating that NOTCH signaling plays a central role in astrogenesis and our own findings that there is upregulation of certain pathway components in astrocytes relative to NSCs we assessed the effects of inhibiting this pathway. Multiple genes involved in all stages of the NOTCH pathway were found in both in fetal astrocytes and NSCs. In order to better understand the role of Notch signaling in cell fate choice in NSCs we used DAPT, a small molecule inhibitor of the Notch pathway. After four days of culture in NSC, astrocyte, or neuronal growth medium iPSC-derived NSCs exposed to DAPT had increased expression of the neuronal marker β-III-tubulin (TuJ1) compared to untreated cells (Figure 6A–C). No GFAP staining was observed in either the treated or untreated cells and similar results were found in an ESC-derived NSC line. The percentage of TuJ1+ cells was quantified and found to be significantly different across all cell culture medium groups (Figure 6D). The treated cells particularly those in neuronal differentiation medium also displayed enhanced cell death. We also treated fetal astrocytes with DAPT but treatment did not result in the appearance of TuJ1+ cells or increased cell death (data not shown).
Figure 6
DAPT treatment of NSCs promotes neuronal differentiation.
NSCs were stained for TuJ1 (green) after being grown for four days +/− DAPT in, (A) NSC medium (NSC MED), (B) astrocyte differentiation medium (AST DIFF MED), and (C) neuronal differentiation medium (NEU DIFF MED) with an overlay of HOECHST staining (blue) to display all cells, (D) table quantifying the percentage of TuJ1 positive cells for each treatment group. *p-value = 0.03, **p-value = 0.01, ***p-value = 0.0001.
DAPT treatment of NSCs promotes neuronal differentiation.
NSCs were stained for TuJ1 (green) after being grown for four days +/− DAPT in, (A) NSC medium (NSC MED), (B) astrocyte differentiation medium (AST DIFF MED), and (C) neuronal differentiation medium (NEU DIFF MED) with an overlay of HOECHST staining (blue) to display all cells, (D) table quantifying the percentage of TuJ1 positive cells for each treatment group. *p-value = 0.03, **p-value = 0.01, ***p-value = 0.0001.
Overexpression of astrocyte specific transcription factors in NSCs
Our microarray data and previous studies indicate that NFIX and HOPX are critical for initiation of transcription programs that promote astrocyte differentiation and/or maintenance. To better understand the roles of these genes in astrocyte biology we transduced lentivirus from NFIX and HOPX, along with a GFP control, into fetal astrocytes and NSCs and assayed for expression of selected markers by qPCR. NSCs were further split three days post-infection and grown in NSC, astrocyte, and neuronal medium for an additional three days. Fetal astrocytes were readily infected as evidence by GFP expression while NSC infection occurred at lower frequency (Figure 7A–B). However, all culture conditions/cell types had strong overexpression of HOPX and NFIX (see Table with Figure 7C).
Figure 7
Lentiviral overexpression of NFIX and HOPX in fetal astrocytes and NSCs.
GFP expression in GFP, NFIX-nuclear GFP, and HOPX nuclear-GFP cells in (A) Lonza fetal astrocytes (LON FET AST), and (B) NSCs. (C) Tables showing qPCR fold-changes of selected genes in fetal astrocytes and NSCs grown in NSC, astrocyte, or neuronal medium relative to b-actin with GFP lentivirus. The table shows the relative overexpression levels of the NFIX and HOPX lentiviruses.
Lentiviral overexpression of NFIX and HOPX in fetal astrocytes and NSCs.
GFP expression in GFP, NFIX-nuclear GFP, and HOPX nuclear-GFP cells in (A) Lonza fetal astrocytes (LON FET AST), and (B) NSCs. (C) Tables showing qPCR fold-changes of selected genes in fetal astrocytes and NSCs grown in NSC, astrocyte, or neuronal medium relative to b-actin with GFP lentivirus. The table shows the relative overexpression levels of the NFIX and HOPX lentiviruses.Expression of the early astrocyte marker CD44 increased ∼2-fold with both HOPX and NFIX overexpression in fetal astrocytes (assayed three days post-infection). Somewhat surprisingly NFIX overexpression decreased GFAP transcripts ∼90% and HOPX ∼70% in fetal astrocytes. For NSCs we saw a similar modest increase in CD44 transcripts in all culture conditions with NFIX overexpression and a ∼2-fold increase with HOPX in neuronal medium. HOPX also upregulated NFIX expression 2.5–3 fold in astrocyte and neuronal medium.As we observed such a large decrease in GFAP and HOPX RNA expression in fetal astrocytes we performed immunofluorescence to determine if protein levels also decreased. We were unable to detect any significant differences in GFAP or HOPX staining between GFP and NFIX infections (Figure 8A–B). Upon re-examining the raw qPCR data it appears that the levels of GFAP and HOPX expression in normal (GFP-treated) astrocytes is so high that even a large decrease with NFIXinfection still leaves highly abundant levels of RNA for these genes such that protein levels between GFP and NFIX infected groups are not affected.
Figure 8
GFAP and HOPX expression in NFIX infected fetal astrocytes.
Fetal astrocytes were infected with GFP or NFIX and stained with either (A) GFAP (red), or (B) HOPX (red) antibodies. HOECHST staining (blue) was overplayed to display all cells and GFP (green) to display infected cells.
GFAP and HOPX expression in NFIX infected fetal astrocytes.
Fetal astrocytes were infected with GFP or NFIX and stained with either (A) GFAP (red), or (B) HOPX (red) antibodies. HOECHST staining (blue) was overplayed to display all cells and GFP (green) to display infected cells.
Discussion
We have carried out the first study examining gene expression in human fetal astrocytes. Previous studies of astrocyte expression have used murine astrocytes [16], human glial progenitors [17], or astrocytes derived from PSCs [18]. Our goal was not to do a comprehensive survey of genes differentially expressed in astrocytes but identify clear astrocyte specific markers, core pathways and transcription factors important for astrocyte development and maintenance, and compare our results to those of previously published datasets. We reasoned that to achieve this goal for identifying astrocyte markers, each marker should be at least 5-fold enriched relative to NSCs, be expressed in the other dataset of PSC-derived astrocytes, and have very low expression levels in other NSC-derived neuronal and NSC gene expression datasets [18], [20]. Using these criteria, we identified 24 genes that appear to be enriched in astrocytes compared to NSCs and neurons differentiated from NSCs. The fact that known astrocyte markers such as GFAP, CD44, and NFIX are in this list makes us confident that many of the other genes are also astrocyte specific. Other astrocyte enriched genes on the list known to have roles in astrocyte function include LGALS3, CRYAB, S100A6, TGFB3 [40]–[43]. We have previously reported that another gene on this list, HOPX, is enriched in PSC-derived astrocytes [18] and LHX2 and PRRX1 are enriched in NSC-derived and mouse astrocytes [15], [18]. Several Notch pathway genes are on this list including HEY1 and a newly described member of this pathway BEND6. HEY1 has previously been shown to drive generation of astrocytes at later stages of mouse brain development [44] and BEND6 was found to inhibit self-renewal in NSCs from the mouse cortex and promote neurogenesis through antagonism of the Notch signaling pathway. Due to the importance of Notch signaling in astrogenesis BEND6 could be a novel mediator of this pathway as NSCs differentiate to glia [25].We also identified nearly 100 transcription factors that are differentially expressed between astrocytes and NSCs. Some like HEY1 are known to be effectors of NOTCH signaling and others like the NFI family of transcription factors are known to modulate the NOTCH effector HES5 [10]. Additional transcription factors that could play important roles in gliogenesis include LHX2, PRRX1, and HOPX. Each of these was also found to be present in mouse astrocytes and astrocytes differentiated from NSCs [16], [18]. Interestingly, fetal astrocytes and not NSC-derived astrocytes expressed EMX2, FOXG1, and OTX2 which are not found in NSC-derived astrocytes. These three genes are well known as forebrain markers and as the astrocytes used in this study were from the cortex it is possible that they represent region specific markers for cortical astrocytes [30], [31].We overexpressed NFIX and HOPX lentivirus in fetal astrocytes and NSCs finding that both increased CD44 expression in both cell types while NFIX greatly diminished GFAP and HOPX expression in fetal astrocytes. However, this decrease of GFAP and HOPX RNA was not seen at the protein level. It appears that there is a huge excess of GFAP and HOPX transcripts produced in fetal astrocytes such that even a large decrease in the transcription of these genes does not affect the final levels of protein that is synthesized. Singh et al. [12] have shown that an NFIX splice variant but not the more common NFIX mRNA we used can upregulate the GFAP promoter in HEK293 cells and primary astrocytes. Further work will be necessary to determine exactly how NFIX regulates HOPX and GFAP but as HOPX did increase NFIX RNA expression in NSCs grown in several culture conditions it is quite possible that NFIX and HOPX are part of a regulatory loop that is important for maintenance of astrocyte identity.We further studied the role of transcription factors by extracting binding sites for transcription factors for four of our putative fetal astrocyte markers. This search yielded several transcription factors that are expressed in fetal astrocytes including E2F2 and TCFL2 which have been shown to be important for gliogenesis in mice [38], the NFI member NFIC, and SRF another gene that is critical for astrocyte generation.When examining pathways we found that for the NOTCH pathway two non-canonical ligands, DLK1 and DNER, are highly overexpressed in astrocytes. DNER activates NOTCH signaling in Bergmann glia and has been shown to induce glial and neuronal differentiation in zebrafish while inhibiting NSC proliferation [45]–[46]. Conversely, DLK1 has been shown to inhibit the NOTCH signaling pathway [47]–[48]. To test the role of NOTCH signaling in NSCs we treated them with DAPT and found that in a short period of time it can promote neurogenesis in several different culture conditions. Inhibition of NOTCH by DAPT also increased cell death particularly in neuronal medium. Similar results have been reported when neural rosettes or NSCs cultured are treated with DAPT [49]–[50]. Future studies will need to resolve whether the ability of NOTCH signaling to both stabilize the NSC state and promote astrogenesis is due to differential coupling with HES/HEY genes and involvement of other modulators of Notch signaling such as BEND6.The microarray analysis of pathways revealed interesting results for the TGF-beta pathway. The TGF-beta is highly active in one subset of fetal astrocytes and relatively inactive in NSCs and NSC derived astrocytes. Thus, activation of this pathway in NSCs may enhance astrocyte differentiation. Similarly modulation of JAK/STAT, MAPK, and PDGF signaling in NSCs is likely to have significant effects on gliogenesis.In conclusion, we have elucidated gene expression in fetal astrocytes and found that they express many previously described astrocyte marker genes and also express signaling components from pathways known to be active in this cell type. We have also identified potentially new human astrocyte markers that will be of use in distinguishing astrocytes from other neural cells and transcription factors that could be the starting point for identifying the core transcriptional circuitry that defines a human astrocyte. Our results underscore the importance of a group of transcription factors in astrocyte development and maintenance and reinforce the importance of the NOTCH, TGF-beta, JAK/STAT, and MAPK signaling pathways in this cell type. As such this dataset will be an important building block for further understanding human astrocyte biology.List of antibodies used.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Primers used for qPCR.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Genes up at least 5-fold in pairwise comparisons between two fetal astrocyte and two NSC samples.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Expression levels of transcription factors in fetal astrocytes, NSCs, and neurons and astrocytes differentiated from NSCs.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Expression levels of chromatin binding genes in fetal astrocytes, NSCs, and neurons and astrocytes differentiated from NSCs.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Expression levels of NOTCH signaling pathway genes in fetal astrocytes, NSCs, and neurons and astrocytes differentiated from NSCs.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Expression levels of TGF-beta signaling pathway genes in fetal astrocytes, NSCs, and neurons and astrocytes differentiated from NSCs.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Expression levels of JAK/STAT signaling pathway genes in fetal astrocytes, NSCs, and neurons and astrocytes differentiated from NSCs.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Expression levels of MAPK signaling pathway genes in fetal astrocytes, NSCs, and neurons and astrocytes differentiated from NSCs.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Expression levels of growth factors and growth factor receptor genes in fetal astrocytes, NSCs, and neurons and astrocytes differentiated from NSCs.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Xiaoyan Li; Jason M Newbern; Yaohong Wu; Meghan Morgan-Smith; Jian Zhong; Jean Charron; William D Snider Journal: Neuron Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Peng Kang; Hyun Kyoung Lee; Stacey M Glasgow; Meggie Finley; Tataka Donti; Zachary B Gaber; Brett H Graham; Aaron E Foster; Bennett G Novitch; Richard M Gronostajski; Benjamin Deneen Journal: Neuron Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Jan J Molenaar; Raquel Domingo-Fernández; Marli E Ebus; Sven Lindner; Jan Koster; Ksenija Drabek; Pieter Mestdagh; Peter van Sluis; Linda J Valentijn; Johan van Nes; Marloes Broekmans; Franciska Haneveld; Richard Volckmann; Isabella Bray; Lukas Heukamp; Annika Sprüssel; Theresa Thor; Kristina Kieckbusch; Ludger Klein-Hitpass; Matthias Fischer; Jo Vandesompele; Alexander Schramm; Max M van Noesel; Luigi Varesio; Frank Speleman; Angelika Eggert; Raymond L Stallings; Huib N Caron; Rogier Versteeg; Johannes H Schulte Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-10-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Anna V Molofsky; Robert Krencik; Robert Krenick; Erik M Ullian; Erik Ullian; Hui-hsin Tsai; Benjamin Deneen; William D Richardson; Ben A Barres; David H Rowitch Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Anastasia G Efthymiou; Joe Steiner; William J Pavan; Stephen Wincovitch; Denise M Larson; Forbes D Porter; Mahendra S Rao; Nasir Malik Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: Ye Zhang; Steven A Sloan; Laura E Clarke; Christine Caneda; Colton A Plaza; Paul D Blumenthal; Hannes Vogel; Gary K Steinberg; Michael S B Edwards; Gordon Li; John A Duncan; Samuel H Cheshier; Lawrence M Shuer; Edward F Chang; Gerald A Grant; Melanie G Hayden Gephart; Ben A Barres Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Eric S Sandhurst; Sharad V Jaswandkar; Krishna Kundu; Dinesh R Katti; Kalpana S Katti; Hongli Sun; Daniel Engebretson; Kevin R Francis Journal: ACS Appl Bio Mater Date: 2022-01-19
Authors: Ben M Maoz; Anna Herland; Edward A FitzGerald; Thomas Grevesse; Charles Vidoudez; Alan R Pacheco; Sean P Sheehy; Tae-Eun Park; Stephanie Dauth; Robert Mannix; Nikita Budnik; Kevin Shores; Alexander Cho; Janna C Nawroth; Daniel Segrè; Bogdan Budnik; Donald E Ingber; Kevin Kit Parker Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 68.164
Authors: Cristian Arredondo; Carolina Cefaliello; Agnieszka Dyrda; Nur Jury; Pablo Martinez; Iván Díaz; Armando Amaro; Helene Tran; Danna Morales; Maria Pertusa; Lorelei Stoica; Elsa Fritz; Daniela Corvalán; Sebastián Abarzúa; Maxs Méndez-Ruette; Paola Fernández; Fabiola Rojas; Meenakshi Sundaram Kumar; Rodrigo Aguilar; Sandra Almeida; Alexandra Weiss; Fernando J Bustos; Fernando González-Nilo; Carolina Otero; Maria Florencia Tevy; Daryl A Bosco; Juan C Sáez; Thilo Kähne; Fen-Biao Gao; James D Berry; Katharine Nicholson; Miguel Sena-Esteves; Rodolfo Madrid; Diego Varela; Martin Montecino; Robert H Brown; Brigitte van Zundert Journal: Neuron Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 18.688