Literature DB >> 19369642

Development and validation of a dynamic prognostic tool for prostate cancer recurrence using repeated measures of posttreatment PSA: a joint modeling approach.

Cécile Proust-Lima1, Jeremy M G Taylor.   

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a biomarker routinely and repeatedly measured on prostate cancer patients treated by radiation therapy (RT). It was shown recently that its whole pattern over time rather than just its current level was strongly associated with prostate cancer recurrence. To more accurately guide clinical decision making, monitoring of PSA after RT would be aided by dynamic powerful prognostic tools that incorporate the complete posttreatment PSA evolution. In this work, we propose a dynamic prognostic tool derived from a joint latent class model and provide a measure of variability obtained from the parameters asymptotic distribution. To validate this prognostic tool, we consider predictive accuracy measures and provide an empirical estimate of their variability. We also show how to use them in the longitudinal context to compare the dynamic prognostic tool we developed with a proportional hazard model including either baseline covariates or baseline covariates and the expected level of PSA at the time of prediction in a landmark model. Using data from 3 large cohorts of patients treated after the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we show that the dynamic prognostic tool based on the joint model reduces the error of prediction and offers a powerful tool for individual prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19369642      PMCID: PMC2697347          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  21 in total

1.  Predictive accuracy and explained variation in Cox regression.

Authors:  M Schemper; R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Rate of PSA rise predicts metastatic versus local recurrence after definitive radiotherapy.

Authors:  C I Sartor; M H Strawderman; X H Lin; K E Kish; P W McLaughlin; H M Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Identification and efficacy of longitudinal markers for survival.

Authors:  Robin Henderson; Peter Diggle; Angela Dobson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Predicting time to prostate cancer recurrence based on joint models for non-linear longitudinal biomarkers and event time outcomes.

Authors:  Donna K Pauler; Dianne M Finkelstein
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Individualized predictions of disease progression following radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Menggang Yu; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Defining biochemical cure for prostate carcinoma patients treated with external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  L L Kestin; F A Vicini; E L Ziaja; J S Stromberg; R C Frazier; A A Martinez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prostate specific antigen doubling time as a surrogate end point for prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Judd Moul; Peter R Carroll; Leon Sun; Deborah Lubeck; Ming-Hui Chen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prospective accuracy for longitudinal markers.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  51 in total

1.  Deriving benefit of early detection from biomarker-based prognostic models.

Authors:  L Y T Inoue; R Gulati; C Yu; M W Kattan; R Etzioni
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Discussion of "Predictive comparison of joint longitudinal-survival modeling: a case study illustrating competing approaches", by Hanson, Branscum and Johnson.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  On longitudinal prediction with time-to-event outcome: Comparison of modeling options.

Authors:  Marlena Maziarz; Patrick Heagerty; Tianxi Cai; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Incorporating longitudinal biomarkers for dynamic risk prediction in the era of big data: A pseudo-observation approach.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Susan Murray; Laura H Mariani; Wenjun Ju
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimating differences in restricted mean lifetime using observational data subject to dependent censoring.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Douglas E Schaubel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Variable-Domain Functional Regression for Modeling ICU Data.

Authors:  Jonathan E Gellar; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Dale M Needham; Ciprian M Crainiceanu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Pointwise nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator of stochastically ordered survivor functions.

Authors:  Yongseok Park; Jeremy M G Taylor; John D Kalbfleisch
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.445

8.  Exploring causality mechanism in the joint analysis of longitudinal and survival data.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Cheng Zheng; Joseph Kang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Predicting Clinical Binary Outcome Using Multivariate Longitudinal Data: Application to Patients with Newly Diagnosed Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Feng Gao; J Philip Miller; Julia A Beiser; Chengjie Xiong; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2015-10-26

10.  Penalised logistic regression and dynamic prediction for discrete-time recurrent event data.

Authors:  Entisar Elgmati; Rosemeire L Fiaccone; R Henderson; John N S Matthews
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.