| Literature DB >> 24847435 |
Leonardo Gomes da Fonseca1, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa1, Jorge Sabbaga1, Paulo Marcelo Hoff1.
Abstract
A 55-year old man was treated with sunitinib 50 mg/day for 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off, as a first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. During the fourth week of the first cycle, he was admitted to the Emergency Department with abdominal pain and vomiting. Acute acalculous cholecystitis was diagnosed. Sunitnib-associated cholecystitis is a rare adverse event previously reported in few cases. The mechanism behind this complication is not fully understood, although vascular endothelial dysfunction may play a role. The use of this drug is expanding in clinical oncology, and physicians should be aware of this life-threating adverse event.Entities:
Keywords: acalculous cholecystitis; angiogenic agents; receptor tyrosine kinase; sunitinib malate
Year: 2014 PMID: 24847435 PMCID: PMC4019924 DOI: 10.4081/cp.2014.635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Pract ISSN: 2039-7275
Figure 1.Initial presentation: hypervascular expansive mass in the right kidney (A and B) and multiple lung metastases (C and D).
Figure 2.Computed tomographic scan revealed dilatation of the gallbladder lumen and pericholecystic fluid collection.
Figure 3.Cholecystitis: predominantly mucosal-based inflammatory infiltrate (hematoxylin and eosin x20).
Adverse drug reaction probability scale (Naranjo scale) in the present case.
| Yes | No | Do not know | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Are there previous conclusive reports on this reaction? | 0 | |||
| 2. Did the adverse event appear after the suspected drug was given? | 2 | |||
| 3. Did the adverse reaction improve when the drug was discontinued or a specific antagonist was given? | 0 | |||
| 4. Did the adverse reaction appear when the drug was re-administered? | 0 | |||
| 5. Are there alternative causes that could have caused the reaction? | 2 | |||
| 6. Did the reaction reappear when a placebo was given? | 0 | |||
| 7. Was the drug detected in any body fluid in toxic concentrations? | 0 | |||
| 8. Was the reaction more severe when the dose was increased, or less severe when the dose was decreased? | 0 | |||
| 9. Did the patient have a similar reaction to the same or similar drugs in any previous exposure? | 0 | |||
| 10. Was the adverse event confirmed by any objective evidence? | 1 | |||
| Scoring | 5 |