Literature DB >> 24846927

Predictors of colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy: based on initial and consecutive findings.

C C G van Enckevort1, A P J de Graaf, H Hollema, W J Sluiter, J H Kleibeuker, J J Koornstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal adenoma patients are kept under surveillance because of the risk of developing metachronous neoplasia. The aim is to determine predictors of neoplasia development after polypectomy.
METHODS: It is an observational cohort study. 433 Patients who had ≥1 adenoma removed between 1988 and 2004 were included, with follow-up until 2010. Multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics was performed at initial colonoscopy and at consecutive positive examinations. The main outcome measured was the development of metachronous (advanced) adenomas during follow-up.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 85 months. Multivariate analysis identified male sex, ≥3 adenomas, high-grade dysplasia and age ≥55 years as risk factors for metachronous lesions at first surveillance. Analysis using life expectancy as a timescale showed ≥3 adenomas to be the only predictive factor. The time to second or third metachronous adenoma did not depend on the number of adenomas. Patients with ≥3 adenomas were five years older at the time of their first polypectomy compared with those with fewer adenomas, but of the same age at the first recurrence. Prevalence of high-grade dysplasia was associated with age and high-grade dysplasia in the prior adenoma independent of time interval.
CONCLUSIONS: Adenoma development after polypectomy occurs in a regular and repetitive way. Our data suggest that only the interval between the initial colonoscopy and the first follow-up colonoscopy should be based on initial findings, i.e. number of adenomas, and that subsequent colonoscopies can be planned at predetermined intervals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24846927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth J Med        ISSN: 0300-2977            Impact factor:   1.422


  7 in total

1.  Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study.

Authors:  Chung Hyun Tae; Chang Mo Moon; Seong-Eun Kim; Sung-Ae Jung; Chang Soo Eun; Jae Jun Park; Geom Seog Seo; Jae Myung Cha; Sung Chul Park; Jaeyoung Chun; Hyun Jung Lee; Yunho Jung; Jin Oh Kim; Young-Eun Joo; Dong Il Park
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  A prognostic model for advanced colorectal neoplasia recurrence.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Karen Messer; John A Baron; David A Lieberman; Elizabeth T Jacobs; Amanda J Cross; Gwen Murphy; Maria Elena Martinez; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

6.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 12.045

7.  Metabolic syndrome is a risk factor for adenoma occurrence at surveillance colonoscopy: A single-center experience in Korea.

Authors:  Nam Hee Kim; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Chong Il Sohn; Kyuyong Choi; Yoon Suk Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.