Literature DB >> 24846543

New perspectives on lamellar keratoplasty.

George D Kymionis1, Dimitrios G Mikropoulos, Dimitra M Portaliou, Kostantinos G Boboridis, Irini C Voudouragkaki, Nikolaos D Dragoumis, Anastasios G P Konstas.   

Abstract

Lamellar (anterior and posterior) keratoplasty entails the surgical replacement of diseased-only corneal tissue, while healthy host corneal tissue is preserved. Selective keratoplasty offers several advantages in comparison to penetrating keratoplasty such as a lower rate of graft rejection, less endothelial cell loss, faster/superior visual rehabilitation and enhanced resistance to closed injury. The surgical approach of "partial corneal transplantation" may be divided into anterior and posterior: techniques including superficial and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (SALK and DALK, respectively) and endothelial keratoplasty as well as Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). These novel surgical procedures are rapidly becoming the preferred therapy option for specific corneal dysfunctions involving the corneal stroma (SALK, DALK), or corneal endothelium (DSAEK, DMEK). During the past decade, the continuing advancement of surgical techniques and the development of innovative surgical instruments have significantly enhanced corneal transplantation. Lamellar keratoplasty techniques facilitate corneal surgery, provide patients with superior outcomes and can successfully restore vision in corneal-related blindness. Nevertheless, more long-term evidence is needed to better evaluate these promising new techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24846543     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-014-0121-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  6 in total

1.  Isolated descemetorhexis for anterior synechiolysis prior to endothelial keratoplasty - case report and technique.

Authors:  Konstantinos Droutsas; Konstantinos Andreanos; Apostolos Lazaridis; Ilias Georgalas; George Kymionis; Dimitris Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Evaluation of interface reflectivity and corneal aberrations following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Hamid Khakshour; Malihe Nikandish; Maryam Salehi; Haleh Ghooshkhanehei; Amirhosein Vejdani
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 May-Aug

3.  Traumatic Wound Dehiscence after Keratoplasty: Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Visual Outcome.

Authors:  Mohamed Bahgat Goweida; Hany Ahmed Helaly; Alaa Atef Ghaith
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 4.  Interface infectious keratitis after anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clinical features and treatment strategies. A review.

Authors:  Luigi Fontana; Antonio Moramarco; Erika Mandarà; Giuseppe Russello; Alfonso Iovieno
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The Differential Expression of Cytokines and Growth Factors After SMILE Compared With FS-LASIK in Rabbits.

Authors:  Lingjia Liu; Wenbo Cheng; Di Wu; Luxia Chen; Shasha Yu; Tong Zuo; Lin Zhang; Kun Yang; Hua Li; Hui Zhang; Pinghui Wei; Alex Lap Ki Ng; George Pak-Man Cheng; Victor Chi-Pang Woo; Jia Yin; Kin Chiu; Yan Wang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Association of Visual Function Measures with Drusen Volume in Early Stages of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Susanne G Pondorfer; Maximilian W M Wintergerst; Shekoufeh Gorgi Zadeh; Thomas Schultz; Manuel Heinemann; Frank G Holz; Robert P Finger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.799

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.