Literature DB >> 12208639

Sex differences in stress responses: social rejection versus achievement stress.

Laura R Stroud1, Peter Salovey, Elissa S Epel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in stress responses may be one mechanism underlying gender differences in depression. We hypothesized that men and women would show different adrenocortical responses to different stressors. In particular, we predicted that women would show greater responses to social rejection stressors, whereas men would demonstrate greater responses to achievement stressors.
METHODS: Following a rest session in which they habituated to the laboratory, 50 healthy volunteers (24 men and 26 women, mean age 19.1, SD = 1.13) were randomly assigned to achievement or rejection stress conditions. The achievement condition involved a mathematical and a verbal challenge; the rejection condition involved two social interaction challenges. Self-reported affect and salivary cortisol were measured throughout each stress session (baseline, stress, and poststress periods).
RESULTS: There were no sex differences in mood ratings following the stressors; however, cortisol responses showed the predicted gender by condition by time interaction. Men showed significantly greater cortisol responses to the achievement challenges, but women showed greater cortisol responses to the social rejection challenges.
CONCLUSIONS: Women appear more physiologically reactive to social rejection challenges, but men react more to achievement challenges. Women's greater reactivity to rejection stress may contribute to the increased rates of affective disorders in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12208639     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01333-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  204 in total

1.  Adaptive patterns of stress responsivity: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Marco Del Giudice; J Benjamin Hinnant; Bruce J Ellis; Mona El-Sheikh
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-12-12

2.  The Imperial Stress Assessment Tool (ISAT): a feasible, reliable and valid approach to measuring stress in the operating room.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Tanya Tierney; Nick Sevdalis; Rajesh Aggarwal; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity.

Authors:  Marco Del Giudice; Bruce J Ellis; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Narcissism Predicts Heightened Cortisol Reactivity to a Psychosocial Stressor in Men.

Authors:  Robin S Edelstein; Ilona S Yim; Jodi A Quas
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2010-10-01

5.  Assessing secondary control and its association with youth depression symptoms.

Authors:  John R Weisz; Sarah E Francis; Sarah Kate Bearman
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2010-10

6.  Psychological and Biological Validation of a Novel Digital Social Peer Evaluation Experiment (digi-SPEE).

Authors:  Claudia Menne-Lothmann; Jeroen Decoster; Ruud van Winkel; Dina Collip; Bart P F Rutten; Philippe Delespaul; Marc De Hert; Catherine Derom; Evert Thiery; Nele Jacobs; Jim van Os; Marieke Wichers
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.339

7.  Gender difference in neural response to psychological stress.

Authors:  Jiongjiong Wang; Marc Korczykowski; Hengyi Rao; Yong Fan; John Pluta; Ruben C Gur; Bruce S McEwen; John A Detre
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 8.  Atypical reactivity of heart rate variability to stress and depression across development: Systematic review of the literature and directions for future research.

Authors:  Jessica L Hamilton; Lauren B Alloy
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-09-20

9.  Community-dwelling cocaine-dependent men and women respond differently to social stressors versus cocaine cues.

Authors:  Angela E Waldrop; Kimber L Price; Stacia M Desantis; Annie N Simpson; Sudie E Back; Aimee L McRae; Eve G Spratt; Mary Jeanne Kreek; Kathleen T Brady
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 10.  Application of psychological theories on the role of gender in caregiving to psycho-oncology research.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Hannah-Rose Mitchell; Amanda Ting
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.