| Literature DB >> 24844926 |
Masashi Suda1, Samantha J Brooks2, Vincent Giampietro3, Rudolf Uher1, David Mataix-Cols4, Michael J Brammer3, Steven C R Williams3, Janet Treasure1, Iain C Campbell1.
Abstract
Anorexia nervosa (AN), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) are often co-morbid; however, the aetiology of such co-morbidity has not been well investigated. This study examined brain activation in women with AN and in healthy control (HC) women during the provocation of symmetry/ordering-related anxiety. During provocation, patients with AN showed more anxiety compared to HCs, which was correlated with the severity of symmetry/ordering symptoms. Activation in the right parietal lobe and right prefrontal cortex (rPFC) in response to provocation was reduced in the AN group compared with the HC group. The reduced right parietal activation observed in the AN group is consistent with parietal lobe involvement in visuospatial cognition and with studies of OCD reporting an association between structural abnormalities in this region and the severity of 'ordering' symptoms. Reduced rPFC activation in response to symmetry/ordering provocation has similarities with some, but not all, data collected from patients with AN who were exposed to images of food and bodies. Furthermore, the combination of data from the AN and HC groups showed that rPFC activation during symptom provocation was inversely correlated with the severity of symmetry/ordering symptoms. These data suggest that individuals with AN have a diminished ability to cognitively deal with illness-associated symptoms of provocation. Furthermore, our data also suggest that symptom provocation can progressively overload attempts by the rPFC to exert cognitive control. These findings are discussed in the context of the current neurobiological models of AN.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24844926 PMCID: PMC4028263 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097998
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Illustration of the block-design paradigm.
Demographic and psychometric data.
| AN ( | HC ( | AN vs. HC ( | |
| Age | 26.8 (8.0) | 24.3 (8.0) | 0.27 |
| BMI | 15.3 (1.1) | 21.6 (2.2) | <0.001 |
| Duration of ED | 10.0 (7.0) | N/A | |
|
| |||
| Total score | |||
| Restrained eating | 2.8 (1.7) | 1.0 (1.2) | <0.001 |
| Eating concern | 3.3 (1.4) | 0.4 (0.7) | <0.001 |
| Weight concern | 3.8 (1.6) | 1.0 (1.1) | <0.001 |
| Shape concern | 4.6 (1.2) | 1.5 (1.4) | <0.001 |
| HADS: | 13.4 (3.7) | 4.5 (2.5) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Symmetry images | 6.2 (2.3) | 3.9 (2.3) | 0.003 |
| Control images | 1.2 (1.0) | 1.1 (0.9) | 0.85 |
|
| |||
| Checking | 4.6 (3.5) | 1.6 (2.5) | 0.003 |
| Hoarding | 4.0 (2.4) | 2.4 (2.6) | 0.04 |
| Neutralising | 3.4 (3.6) | 0.5 (0.9) | <0.001 |
| Obsessing | 7.7 (3.5) | 1.5 (2.3) | <0.001 |
| Ordering | 7.1 (3.3) | 2.3 (2.3) | <0.001 |
| Washing | 4.1 (4.2) | 0.7 (1.1) | <0.001 |
Values are mean and (SD).
Abbreviations: AN, anorexia nervosa; BN, bulimia nervosa; HC, healthy control; BMI, body mass index; ED, eating disorder; EDEQ, Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire; HADS, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; OCI-R, Obsessive Compulsive Inventory Revised.
Group comparison between healthy controls and patients with AN for activation in response to symmetry/order images.
| Brain region | BA | Side | Talairach's coordinates | No. of voxels |
| ||
| X | Y | Z | |||||
| HC>AN | |||||||
| Frontal Lobe, Superior Frontal Gyrus | 10 | R | 22 | 60 | −1 | 202 | 0.0002 |
| Parietal Lobe, Precuneus | 7 | R | 22 | −67 | 36 | 99 | 0.0007 |
| AN>HC | |||||||
| None | |||||||
BA, Brodmann's area; Voxel-wise P-value <0.05 and cluster-wise P-value <0.002. At this level, the cumulative number of expected false-positive clusters in the group comparison was <1.
Figure 2Between-group map activation showing activation provoked by symmetry-symptom images compared with neutral images in women with AN vs. healthy controls (HC).
Z numbers are Talairach Z coordinates. Bright yellow indicates a large difference between groups, and dark orange indicates a small difference between groups. The colour scale of the significant clusters goes from dark red to yellow, denoting the increasing difference between the groups (yellow = groups most different). The bar charts show the mean power and standard error of brain activation (goodness-of-fit statistics: SSQ) extracted from the illustrated clusters separated for AN and HC.
Figure 3Scatter graph for rPFC activation and scores for ordering.