Literature DB >> 24844852

Spontaneous and indicated preterm birth subtypes: interobserver agreement and accuracy of classification.

Molly J Stout1, Rachell Busam2, George A Macones2, Methodius G Tuuli2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate interobserver variability and correct classification of preterm birth into spontaneous and indicated subtypes. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study in which a trained obstetric nurse, maternal fetal medicine (MFM) fellow, and MFM faculty member independently reviewed discharge summaries and full medical records to classify preterm birth into "spontaneous" and "indicated" subtypes. Consensus classification was obtained with a senior faculty member and was considered the correct classification. Proportions of correct classification by both discharge summary and full medical record review and by level of reviewer were compared with the use of the χ(2) test. Interobserver variability was estimated with the use of Fleiss' kappa.
RESULTS: Of 132 preterm births, 58.8% were spontaneous. Interrater agreement for classification of preterm birth subtype based on the full medical record review was substantial (0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.80). Interrater agreement was slightly less, based on discharge summary classification alone (Kappa, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.79) compared with a full medical record review, but this difference was not significant (P = .3). Correct classifications for research nurse, MFM fellow, and MFM faculty member were 85%, 95%, and 93%, respectively, for the full medical records and 85%, 93%, and 92%, respectively, for the discharge summaries alone. There was no significant improvement in correct classification based on full medical record review compared with discharge summary alone for any level of reviewer (P > .6).
CONCLUSION: There is substantial, but imperfect, agreement between reviewers for classification of preterm birth into spontaneous and indicated subtypes. Incorrect classification may occur 5-15% of the time, even with experienced research personnel. Discharge summaries that are populated with pertinent clinical data may streamline accuracy for research efficiency.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interobserver agreement; preterm birth; research

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24844852      PMCID: PMC4234690          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in defining and classifying the preterm birth syndrome.

Authors:  Michael S Kramer; Aris Papageorghiou; Jennifer Culhane; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Robert L Goldenberg; Michael Gravett; Jay D Iams; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Sarah Waller; Fernando Barros; Hannah Knight; Jose Villar
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  The preterm birth syndrome: issues to consider in creating a classification system.

Authors:  Robert L Goldenberg; Michael G Gravett; Jay Iams; Aris T Papageorghiou; Sarah A Waller; Michael Kramer; Jennifer Culhane; Fernando Barros; Augustin Conde-Agudelo; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Hannah E Knight; Jose Villar
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Recurrence of spontaneous versus medically indicated preterm birth.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Darios Getahun; Morgan R Peltier; Hamisu M Salihu; Anthony M Vintzileos
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Chris C Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

5.  Should spontaneous and medically indicated preterm births be separated for studying aetiology?

Authors:  David A Savitz; Nancy Dole; Amy H Herring; Diane Kaczor; June Murphy; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; John M Thorp; Thaddeus L MacDonald
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Failure of physiologic transformation of the spiral arteries in the placental bed in preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Authors:  Yeon Mee Kim; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Ricardo Gomez; Emmanuel Bujold; Bo Hyun Yoon; Siegfried Rotmensch; Howard T Thaler; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  The preterm birth syndrome: a prototype phenotypic classification.

Authors:  Jose Villar; Aris T Papageorghiou; Hannah E Knight; Michael G Gravett; Jay Iams; Sarah A Waller; Michael Kramer; Jennifer F Culhane; Fernando C Barros; Agustín Conde-Agudelo; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Failure of physiologic transformation of the spiral arteries in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.

Authors:  Yeon Mee Kim; Emmanuel Bujold; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Ricardo Gomez; Bo Hyun Yoon; Howard T Thaler; Siegfried Rotmensch; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth.

Authors:  Robert L Goldenberg; Jennifer F Culhane; Jay D Iams; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Outcomes of Medically Indicated Preterm Births Differ by Indication.

Authors:  Michelle J Wang; Spencer G Kuper; Robin Steele; Rachel A Sievert; Alan T Tita; Lorie M Harper
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The impact of low-dose aspirin on preterm birth: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A A Allshouse; R H Jessel; K D Heyborne
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Early pregnancy vaginal microbiome trends and preterm birth.

Authors:  Molly J Stout; Yanjiao Zhou; Kristine M Wylie; Phillip I Tarr; George A Macones; Methodius G Tuuli
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Hurricane Michael and Adverse Birth Outcomes in the Florida Panhandle: Analysis of Vital Statistics Data.

Authors:  Emily W Harville; Ke Pan; Leslie Beitsch; Samendra P Sherchan; Elaina Gonsoroski; Christopher Uejio; Maureen Y Lichtveld
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.556

5.  Change in Cervical Length across Pregnancies and Preterm Delivery.

Authors:  Annie Dude; Emily S Miller
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  COVID-19 pandemic and population-level pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Rohan D'Souza; Ashraf Kharrat; Deshayne B Fell; John W Snelgrove; Kellie E Murphy; Prakesh S Shah
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.544

7.  Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta-analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021).

Authors:  Jie Yang; Rohan D'Souza; Ashraf Kharrat; Deshayne B Fell; John W Snelgrove; Kellie E Murphy; Prakesh S Shah
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.544

8.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Proteomic Test for Preterm Birth Prediction.

Authors:  Michael Grabner; Julja Burchard; Chi Nguyen; Haechung Chung; Nilesh Gangan; J Jay Boniface; John A F Zupancic; Eric Stanek
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-09-14

9.  Factors Associated with Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Zainab Taha; Ahmed Ali Hassan; Ludmilla Wikkeling-Scott; Dimitrios Papandreou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.