Rami A Al-Horani1, Umesh R Desai. 1. Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Institute for Structural Biology and Drug Discovery, Virginia Commonwealth University , 800 E. Leigh Street, Suite 212, Richmond, Virginia 23219, United States.
Abstract
We recently introduced sulfated pentagalloylglucopyranoside (SPGG) as an allosteric inhibitor of factor XIa (FXIa) (Al-Horani et al., J. Med Chem. 2013, 56, 867-878). To better understand the SPGG-FXIa interaction, we utilized eight SPGG variants and a range of biochemical techniques. The results reveal that SPGG's sulfation level moderately affected FXIa inhibition potency and selectivity over thrombin and factor Xa. Variation in the anomeric configuration did not affect potency. Interestingly, zymogen factor XI bound SPGG with high affinity, suggesting its possible use as an antidote. Acrylamide quenching experiments suggested that SPGG induced significant conformational changes in the active site of FXIa. Inhibition studies in the presence of heparin showed marginal competition with highly sulfated SPGG variants but robust competition with less sulfated variants. Resolution of energetic contributions revealed that nonionic forces contribute nearly 87% of binding energy suggesting a strong possibility of specific interaction. Overall, the results indicate that SPGG may recognize more than one anion-binding, allosteric site on FXIa. An SPGG molecule containing approximately 10 sulfate groups on positions 2 through 6 of the pentagalloylglucopyranosyl scaffold may be the optimal FXIa inhibitor for further preclinical studies.
We recently introduced sulfated pentagalloylglucopyranoside (SPGG) as an allosteric inhibitor of factor XIa (FXIa) (Al-Horani et al., J. Med Chem. 2013, 56, 867-878). To better understand the SPGG-FXIa interaction, we utilized eight SPGG variants and a range of biochemical techniques. The results reveal that SPGG's sulfation level moderately affected FXIa inhibition potency and selectivity over thrombin and factor Xa. Variation in the anomeric configuration did not affect potency. Interestingly, zymogen factor XI bound SPGG with high affinity, suggesting its possible use as an antidote. Acrylamide quenching experiments suggested that SPGG induced significant conformational changes in the active site of FXIa. Inhibition studies in the presence of heparin showed marginal competition with highly sulfated SPGG variants but robust competition with less sulfated variants. Resolution of energetic contributions revealed that nonionic forces contribute nearly 87% of binding energy suggesting a strong possibility of specific interaction. Overall, the results indicate that SPGG may recognize more than one anion-binding, allosteric site on FXIa. An SPGG molecule containing approximately 10 sulfate groups on positions 2 through 6 of the pentagalloylglucopyranosyl scaffold may be the optimal FXIa inhibitor for further preclinical studies.
The clinical burden
of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains high
despite advances in the design of new anticoagulants. It is estimated
that annual VTE incidence is approximately 500–1200 per million
people and the second episode incidences increase nearly 10–40%.[1] A key reason for the occurrence of second episodes
is the adverse effects associated with all anticoagulants used today,
which limit a physician’s employment of an effective, long-term
strategy. Two major classes of traditional anticoagulants, heparins
and coumarins, suffer from elevated bleeding tendency in addition
to other agent-specific adverse effects. Recent introduction of target-specific
oral anticoagulants (TSOAs), including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and
apixaban, was expected to eliminate bleeding risk, yet growing number
of studies are suggesting that bleeding continues to be a problem
in measures that at times is equivalent to that observed with warfarin.[2−4] Further, the TSOAs suffer from nonavailability of an effective antidote
to rapidly reverse bleeding consequences without raising the possibility
of thrombosis. Another aspect that is being brought to light is the
high protein binding capability of TSOAs, especially rivaroxaban and
apixaban, which thwarts efforts to reduce their anticoagulant effects
through dialysis.Current anticoagulants target two key enzymes
of the common pathway
of the coagulation cascade, thrombin and factor Xa. Whereas the heparins
and coumarins indirectly target the two pro-coagulant enzymes, the
TSOAs target them directly. No molecule has reached the clinic that
targets other enzymes of the cascade to date. Yet, several other protein/enzyme
targets are viable alternatives, including factors Va, VIIa, VIIIa,
IXa, XIa and XIIa, and are beginning to be pursued.[5] The logic in pursuing these factors is that blocking a
side arm of a highly interlinked system is likely to only partially
impair the system and not induce complete dysfunction. Thus, inhibiting
factors belonging to either the intrinsic or extrinsic pathway of
coagulation can be expected to reduce thrombotic tendency while maintaining
blood’s natural ability to clot.One coagulation factor
that is gaining keen interest with regard
to developing safer anticoagulant therapy is factor XIa (FXIa). Several
epidemiological observations in humans and investigational studies
in animals indicate that inhibiting FXIa is likely to be associated
with minimal risk of bleeding. Severe factor XI deficiency (10–20%
of the normal) appears to protect against venous thrombosis[6] and ischemic stroke.[7] Likewise, hemophilia C, a genetic defect arising from loss of function
mutations in the factor XI gene, results only in mild bleeding consequences
and this can be easily corrected by replacement with soluble, recombinant
zymogen, factor XI.[8−11] With regard to studies in mice, targeted deletion of the factor
XI gene resulted in a complete absence of occlusive clot formation
in FeCl3-induced carotid artery[12] and inferior vena cava thrombosis models.[13] Yet, interestingly, the deletion did not affect tail bleeding times,
suggesting an absence of a hemostatic defect.[12,14] Similar results were obtained with studies in the baboon,[15,16] rabbit,[17] and rat.[18] These studies lead to the growing evidence that inhibiting
the factor XI arm of coagulation affects the pathologic consequences
of coagulation more than the hemostatic function. Thus, a new paradigm
gaining support in terms of anticoagulation therapy is that inhibitors
of FXIa may exhibit a much safer profile than that observed with current
TSOAs, heparins, and coumarins.HumanFXIa is a 160 kDa disulfide-linked
homodimer. Each monomer
contains a N-terminal heavy chain made up of four
tandem Apple domains A1 through A4 and a C-terminal
light chain containing the trypsin-like catalytic domain.[19,20] No other coagulation enzyme is known to function in vivo as a dimer,
and FXIa is unusually interesting factor in this respect. Another
special structural feature of FXIa is that it possesses multiple regions
of high electropositivity, which can engage highly anionic molecules
such as sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), particularly heparin,[21−24] and polyphosphate.[25] FXIa possesses heparin-binding
sites in the A3 domain of the heavy chain (K252, K253, and K255)[21,22] and in the catalytic domain (K529, R530, R532, K536, and K540).[23,24] Whereas the A3 domain site is primarily involved in template-mediated
processes, such as ternary complexation with plasma glycoprotein antithrombin,
the catalytic domain site is more involved in allosteric modulation
of FXIa’s functional activity, resulting in inhibition of both
small peptide and macromolecular substrate cleavage.[23,24,26] Another region of high electropositivity
arises from the R504, K505, R507, and K509 group of residues located
in the autolysis loop of FXIa, which also contributes to modulation
of serpin specificity.[24]The heparin-binding
sites on coagulation factors present major
opportunities for developing novel coagulation modulators of the future.[27] These sites are typically cooperatively linked
to the catalytic site, as demonstrated particularly for FXIa,[26] which affords the ability to allosterically
inhibit the enzyme. Allosteric inhibition of coagulation enzymes is
a novel paradigm for developing clinically relevant anticoagulants
and offers major advantages over the traditional orthosteric inhibition
mechanism employed today. Whereas active site inhibitors offer dose
as the only parameter for fine modulation of the anticoagulation state,
allosteric inhibitors can offer two independent parameters, dose and
efficacy, to induce a targeted anticoagulation state. Allosterism
relies on the efficiency of transmission of energy from the remote
site to the catalytic site. This energetic coupling inherently depends
on the structure of the ligand, which may or may not induce full conformational
change, resulting in efficacy that is decoupled from the level of
saturation of the allosteric site, i.e., the dose. This can result
in variable efficacies of inhibition (<100%) that may prove to
be value in developing safer anticoagulants. That it is possible to
achieve variable efficacy of inhibition has been recently shown for
few sulfated benzofurans inhibiting thrombin.[28,29]Despite the advantages of allosteric inhibitors, most of synthetic
small molecules reported to inhibit FXIa are orthosteric inhibitors.
These include several scaffolds such as neutral cyclic peptidomimetics,[30] arginine-containing acyclic peptidomimetics,[31−33] aryl boronic acids,[34] bromophenolic carbamates,[35] and tetrahydroisoquinolines,[36] which are being pursued at various levels. We recently
discovered three types of sulfated allosteric inhibitors of FXIa including
sulfated pentagalloylglucoside (SPGG),[37] sulfated quinazolinone (QAO),[38] and monosulfated
benzofurans.[39] Whereas SPGG was based on
a polysulfated aromatic scaffold, sulfated QAO and benzofurans were
based on a monosulfated hydrophobic scaffold. Although structurally
completely different, these groups of molecules allosterically inhibited
FXIa and induced human plasma anticoagulation. However, much remains
to be understood for advancing the paradigm of allosteric anticoagulants
introduced by these interesting molecules. In this work, we study
the interaction of SPGG and its eight variants at a molecular level
to elucidate aspects of structure–function relationships, the
forces involved in this interaction, and the mechanism of inhibition.
We find moderate variation in potency of FXIa inhibition as a function
of SPGG’s sulfation level but no effect on the efficacy and
allosteric mechanism of inhibition. Further, chemical synthesis of
a representative molecule of the most abundant species, i.e., decasulfated
species, revealed comparable inhibition, efficacy, and specificity
profiles to the parent SPGG variants. Interestingly, despite the presence
of significant number of anionic groups, nonionic forces dominate
the SPGG–FXIa interaction under physiologic conditions. Further,
SPGG was found to bind both FXIa and its zymogen factor XI with similar
affinities. Most interestingly, competitive inhibition studies in
the presence of heparin suggest that different SPGG variants appear
to recognize different anion-binding sites. These results enhance
fundamental understanding on SPGG–FXIa interaction and suggest
avenues for further rational design of advanced molecules.
Results
and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization of Variants
of SPGG
Our previous work reported the discovery of SPGG,[37] which is labeled as β-SPGG-2 (4c, see
Scheme 1) in this work for appropriateness
and clarity. β-SPGG-2 was synthesized using a three-step protocol
involving DCC-mediated esterification of β-d-glucopyranose
with 3,4,5-tribenzyloxybenzoic acid followed by palladium-catalyzed
hydrogenation to obtain precursor 3a. The polyphenolic
precursor 3a was sulfated under microwave conditions
for 2 h at 90 °C using trimethylamine–sulfur trioxide
complex to prepare β-SPGG-2.[37] The
label refers to a SPGG variant containing the β anomer of glucose
and prepared following 2 h of sulfation.[37] This initial discovery of potent antifactor XIa activity, which
was found to translate to potent anticoagulation in human plasma and
blood, brought forward questions on the roles of anomeric configuration,
level of sulfation, and nature of forces involved in binding.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of SPGG Derivatives (4a–4h) and the Decasulfated Species (5)
Synthesis of SPGG Derivatives (4a–4h) and the Decasulfated Species (5)
(a) 3,4,5-Tribenzyloxybenzoicacid
or 3,5-dibenzyloxybenzoic acid (5 equiv), DCC (5 equiv), DMAP (5 equiv),
CH2Cl2, reflux, 24 h, 85–90%; (b) H2 (g) (50 psi), Pd(OH)2/C (20%), CH3OH/THF,
rt, 10 h, >92%; (c) N(CH3)3-SO3 (5
equiv/OH), CH3CN (2 mL), MW, 90 °C, 0.5–8 h,
66–72%.High resolution UPLC-MS analysis
indicated that β-SPGG-2
(4c) was composed of hepta- to dodeca-sulfated species
(Figure 1A). A simple analysis suggests that
455–6455 distinct hepta- to dodeca-sulfated species are theoretically
possible for β-SPGG-2, although some of these are more easily
formed than others. We reasoned that the potency of β-SPGG-2
could be significantly improved through a higher level of sulfation,
which could also help enhance the homogeneity of the preparation.
In fact, if the precursor can be per-sulfated, a single homogeneous
product can be realized. Yet, per-sulfation of polyphenolics is extremely
difficult and no per-sulfated molecule has been synthesized to date
that contains pentadeca sulfate groups on a small scaffold, such as
that of pentagalloyl glucopyranoside (PGG) (3a–3c) (Scheme 1). Yet, we hypothesized that the
proportion of undeca-, dodeca-, and higher sulfated species could
be enhanced by extending the sulfation time. Thus, variants including
β-SPGG-0.5 (4a), β-SPGG-1 (4b), β-SPGG-2 (4c), β-SPGG-4 (4d), β-SPGG-6 (4e), and β-SPGG-8 (4f) were synthesized by sulfation of β-PGG (3a)
for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h, respectively, under otherwise identical
conditions. Likewise, α-SPGG-8 (4g) and α,β-SPGG-8
(4h) were synthesized by sulfating α-PGG (3b) and PGG (3c), each obtained from the respective
α-d-glucose and α,β-d-glucose,
for 8 h. The configuration of the anomeric carbon in each variant
was determined by measuring the [α]20 in acetone (c = 1%) of the corresponding polyphenolic precursor. Consistent
with literature,[40] the specific rotations
of the precursors were found to be +25.2° for β-, +65.5°
for α-, and +57.9° for α,β-derivative.
Figure 1
Reversed phase-ion
pairing UPLC–MS analysis of β-SPGG-2
(4c) (A) and β-SPGG-8 (4f) (B). Both 4c and 4f (and likewise other SPGG variants 4a–4h) could be resolved into peaks corresponding
to components with varying levels of sulfation from hepta- to trideca-sulfated
PGG scaffold (see also Supporting Information
Figures S1 and S2). The proportion of higher sulfated species
increases from 4a through 4h.
Reversed phase-ion
pairing UPLC–MS analysis of β-SPGG-2
(4c) (A) and β-SPGG-8 (4f) (B). Both 4c and 4f (and likewise other SPGG variants 4a–4h) could be resolved into peaks corresponding
to components with varying levels of sulfation from hepta- to trideca-sulfated
PGG scaffold (see also Supporting Information
Figures S1 and S2). The proportion of higher sulfated species
increases from 4a through 4h.The detailed compositional profile of these SPGG
variants was measured
using reversed-phase ion-pairing UPLC-ESI-MS analysis, as described
in our earlier work.[37] For variants 4c and 4f, the profiles indicated the presence
of doubly charged molecular ion peaks at 1207, 1297, 1388, 1478, 1569,
1661, and 1750 m/z, which corresponded
to hepta-, octa-, nona-, deca-, undeca-, dodeca-, and trideca- sulfated
species, respectively (Figure 1). Each of these
peaks was a composite of multiple peaks, which implied the presence
of several regioisomers of identical sulfation level. The proportion
changed from 5 (hepta-), 10, 19, 42, 17, 7, and 0 (trideca-) % for
2 h sulfation to 3, 8, 18, 34, 24, 8 and 5% for 8 h sulfation, respectively.
This implied that tridecasulfated species were present in β-SPGG-8
(4f, Figure 1B) but not in β-SPGG-2
(4c). Likewise, the proportion of undeca- and dodeca-
sulfated species increased as the sulfation time increased from 2
to 8 h. In contrast, shortening the sulfation time to 0.5 h resulted
in absence of dodeca- and tridecasulfated species in β-SPGG-0.5
(see Figure S1 and Table S1 in Supporting Information). The microwave synthesis of the different variants was highly reproducible
as assessed by the similarity of UPLC-ESI-MS profiles across at least
three independent synthetic batches (Supporting
Information Figures S1,S2 and Table S1). Using the distribution
of peaks and their corresponding molecular masses, the average molecular
weights (Mr) of the Na+ forms
of β-SPGG-0.5 (4a), β-SPGG-1 (4b), β-SPGG-2 (4c), β-SPGG-4 (4d), β-SPGG-6 (4e), and β-SPGG-8 (4f) were calculated to be 1923, 1940, 1962, 1975, 1960, and 1982, respectively.
Likewise, the UPLC-ESI-MS profiles for α-SPGG-8 (4g) and α,β-SPGG-8 (4h) indicated Mr values of 2071 and 2090, respectively (Supporting Information Figures S1,S2 and Table S1). The Mr data suggests a difference
of ∼190 Da between β-SPGG-0.5 and α,β-SPGG-8,
which could be thought of as an increase of two −OSO3Na groups.A decasulfated species (5) was also
synthesized as
a representative SPGG molecule in an essentially homogeneous form
corresponding to the most abundant species present in each SPGG variant.
Molecule 5 was synthesized using the protocol described
above, except for replacing 3,4,5-tribenzyloxybenzoic acid with 3,5-dibenzyloxybenzoic
acid. Following esterification, hydrogenation, and sulfation, 5 was obtained in quantitative yields. NMR and UPLC-MS were
used to establish its structural homogeneity and chemical identity.
Molecule 5 was found to have 10 sulfate groups, as expected
based on per-sulfation, with a molecular weight of 1438.71 (see Supporting Information).
Inhibition of FXIa by SPGG
Variants
Each SPGG variant
was evaluated for its potential to inhibit FXIa hydrolysis of S-2366,
a chromogenic small peptide substrate, at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. A
dose-dependent reduction in FXIa activity was observed (Figure 2), which was analyzed using the logistic eq 1. The IC50s spanned 0.15–1.77 μg/mL
(72–920 nM), reflecting a moderate range of potencies (Table 1). The efficacies were found to be in the range
of 84–100%, with Hill slopes in the range of 1.0–1.6
(except for 4a). This implies that extending the sulfation
time from 2 (β-SPGG-2) to 8 h (β-SPGG-8) improved the
potency by ∼5-fold without any significant effect on the efficacy
or Hill slope of inhibition. Interestingly, altering the anomeric
carbon configuration (α-, α,β-, or β-) did
not appear to impact in any meaningful way. Thus, the three −OSO3Na groups present on aryl moiety of the anomeric carbon are
not involved in interaction with FXIa. This may imply that the C-1
aromatic ring could be replaced with a C-1 methyl group without affecting
potency. Interestingly, shortening the sulfation time from 2 to 1
h did not significantly reduce the potency (0.80–1.01 μg/mL),
but further decrease in the sulfation time to 0.5 h significantly
reduced the potency by more than 2-fold (Table 1).
Figure 2
Direct inhibition of full-length factor XIa by variably sulfated
SPGG variants as well as the synthesized decasulfated species. The
inhibition of factor XIa by 4f (○), 4e (●), 4d (Δ), 4c (■), 4b (◇), 4a (▲), and 5 (□) was studied at pH 7.4 and 37 °C, as described in Experimental Procedures. Solid lines represent sigmoidal
dose–response fits using eq 1 to the
data to calculate the IC50, ΔY,
and HS values.
Table 1
Inhibition
Parameters for SPGG Variantsa
factor XIa
thrombin
factor
Xa
Mr
IC50 (μg/mL)
IC50 (nM)
HS
ΔY
IC50 (μg/mL)
IC50 (μg/mL)
β-SPGG-0.5 (4a)
1923
1.77 ± 0.05b
920
2.5 ± 0.3
94 ± 3
∼403c
>2375
β-SPGG-1 (4b)
1940
1.01 ± 0.05
521
1.4 ± 0.2
93 ± 4
∼381
770 ± 103
β-SPGG-2 (4c)
1962
0.80 ± 0.02
408
1.0 ± 0.1
100 ± 2
>500
∼338
β-SPGG-4
(4d)
1975
0.40 ± 0.01
203
1.4 ± 0.1
98 ± 2
>500
∼634
β-SPGG-6
(4e)
1960
0.30 ± 0.01
153
1.2 ± 0.1
92 ± 3
∼323
∼495
β-SPGG-8
(4f)
1982
0.15 ± 0.01
76
1.5 ± 0.2
97 ± 2
>500
∼515
α-SPGG-8
(4g)
2071
0.15 ± 0.01
72
1.1 ± 0.1
95 ± 3
∼657
244 ± 14
α,β-SPGG-8 (4h)
2090
0.16 ± 0.01
77
1.6 ± 0.1
84 ± 2
∼237
207 ± 43
5
1439
2.70 ± 0.03
1420
0.9 ± 0.1
100 ± 4
>213
>798
IC50, HS, and ΔY values
were obtained following nonlinear regression analysis
of direct inhibition of human factor XIa, thrombin, and factor Xa
in pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C. Inhibition was monitored by spectrophotometric
measurement of the residual enzyme activity. See details under Experimental Procedures.
Errors represent standard error
calculated using global fit of the data.
Estimated value based on the highest
concentration of the inhibitor used in the experiment.
Direct inhibition of full-length factor XIa by variably sulfated
SPGG variants as well as the synthesized decasulfated species. The
inhibition of factor XIa by 4f (○), 4e (●), 4d (Δ), 4c (■), 4b (◇), 4a (▲), and 5 (□) was studied at pH 7.4 and 37 °C, as described in Experimental Procedures. Solid lines represent sigmoidal
dose–response fits using eq 1 to the
data to calculate the IC50, ΔY,
and HS values.IC50, HS, and ΔY values
were obtained following nonlinear regression analysis
of direct inhibition of humanfactor XIa, thrombin, and factor Xa
in pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C. Inhibition was monitored by spectrophotometric
measurement of the residual enzyme activity. See details under Experimental Procedures.Errors represent standard error
calculated using global fit of the data.Estimated value based on the highest
concentration of the inhibitor used in the experiment.FXIa inhibition by decasulfated
derivative 5 was generally
similar to β-SPGG-2 (4c) except for its ∼3.5-fold
reduced potency. This suggested that the 10 sulfate groups carry good
FXIa inhibition potential but not the best. The result further supports
the idea that specific 3-D orientation of groups on the SPGG scaffold
are important for optimal FXIa inhibition. One plausible reason for
the reduced potency exhibited by 5 is the absence of
phenolic group at the para positions. It is possible
that these p-OH groups in the most abundant species
present in β-SPGG-8 and/or β-SPGG-2 enhance potency through
hydrogen bonding. Another explanation is that other decasulfated regioisomers
with a different pattern of 3,4- or 3,5-disulfates may be more important.
Inhibition of Factor Xa and Thrombin by SPGG Variants
To
assess the specificity features of SPGG variants, two closely
related coagulation enzymes were studied. Using appropriate small
peptide-based chromogenic substrates, the fractional residual thrombin
and factor Xa activities were measured. The SPGG variants displayed
228–3433-fold selectivity against thrombin and factor Xa (Table 1). This implies a high level of specificity for
targeting FXIa. More specifically, β-SPGG-0.5 (4a) and β-SPGG-1 (4b) appear to exhibit equivalent
or better selectivity profile relative to β-SPGG-2 (4c) despite the slight reduction in potency against FXIa. On the other
hand, higher sulfated species, e.g., 4g and 4h, displayed lower selectivity index against thrombin and factor Xa
(Table 1). Also, α-isomeric variants
appear to inhibit factor Xa (IC50 = 207 or 244 μg/mL)
but are not worth studying further because of weak potency (>100
μM).
Finally, the decasulfated derivative 5 was found to maintain
a good selectivity against both thrombin and FXa (>79-fold and
296-fold,
respectively).
Kinetics of β-SPGG-8 (4f) Inhibition of FXIa
Earlier, we reported that β-SPGG-2
(4c) is an
allosteric inhibitor of factor XIa.[37] To
assess whether a higher level of sulfation alters this mechanism,
the kinetics of S-2366 hydrolysis by full-length humanFXIa was performed
in the presence of 0–30 μg/mL β-SPGG-8 at pH 7.4
and 37 °C (Figure 3). The characteristic
hyperbolic profiles were fitted using the standard Michaelis–Menten
kinetic equation to calculate the apparent KM and VMAX (see Supporting Information Table S2). The KM for S-2366 remained essentially invariant (0.24–0.36
mM), while the VMAX decreased steadily
from 76 ± 2 mAU/min in the absence of β-SPGG-8 to 20 ±
2 mAU/min at 30 μg/mL β-SPGG-8. This implies that β-SPGG-8
does not affect the formation of Michaelis complex but induces a significant
dysfunction in the catalytic apparatus, suggesting a noncompetitive
inhibition mechanism. Thus, higher sulfation of the SPGG scaffold
does not change the mechanism of factor XIa inhibition and presumably
intermediate levels of sulfation also retain the noncompetitive mechanism.
Figure 3
Michaelis–Menten
kinetics of S-2366 hydrolysis by full-length
factor XIa in the presence of β-SPGG-8. The initial rate of
hydrolysis at various substrate concentrations was measured in pH
7.4 buffer as described in Experimental Procedures using the wild-type full-length factor XIa. β-SPGG-8 concentrations
are 0 (□), 0.05 (▲), 0.5 (○), 5 (◆), 15
(Δ), and 30 μg/mL (■). Solid lines represent nonlinear
regressional fits to the data using the standard Michaelis–Menten
equation to calculate the VMAX and KM.
Michaelis–Menten
kinetics of S-2366 hydrolysis by full-length
factor XIa in the presence of β-SPGG-8. The initial rate of
hydrolysis at various substrate concentrations was measured in pH
7.4 buffer as described in Experimental Procedures using the wild-type full-length factor XIa. β-SPGG-8 concentrations
are 0 (□), 0.05 (▲), 0.5 (○), 5 (◆), 15
(Δ), and 30 μg/mL (■). Solid lines represent nonlinear
regressional fits to the data using the standard Michaelis–Menten
equation to calculate the VMAX and KM.
Allosteric Quenching of an Active Site Probe
The kinetic
mechanism of inhibition supports the hypothesis that SPGG variants
appear to remotely affect the conformation of the catalytic triad
of FXIa. We predicted that this effect may extend to regions beyond
the catalytic triad. To assess this, we studied the quenching of fluorescence
of DEGR-FXIa, a dansyl-labeled variant, by acrylamide in the presence
and absence of β-SPGG-8 (4f). DEGR-FXIa contains
the fluorophore at the end of the EGR tripeptide (P1–P3 residues),
which is covalently attached to the catalytic Ser. This implies that
the dansyl group senses the electrostatics and dynamics around the
P4 position. Dextran sulfate and hypersulfated heparin have been earlier
shown to reduce the quenching of DEGR-FXIa by acrylamide.[26] Figure 4 shows the quenching
of DEGR-FXIa fluorescence by acrylamide with and without 20 μM
β-SPGG-8 or 20 μM UFH. Acrylamide quenches FXIa’s
fluorescence both in the absence and presence of ligands in a dose-dependent
manner. Yet, the efficiency of quenching is dramatically different.
Whereas considerable saturation is observed for FXIa alone with increasing
quencher concentrations, no such effect is noted in the presence of
the two allosteric ligands. Considering that FXIa is a physiological
dimer,[18,19] the significant nonlinearity of quenching
suggests the possibility of two slightly different fluorophores, which
are being differentiated by the quencher. Indeed, it is possible to
isolate FXIa with only half-functional unit.[18,19] This implies that acrylamide is able to sense protein dynamics for
dimeric FXIa. In contrast, both β-SPGG-8 and UFH stem quenching
to only about 50% of that observed in their absence at 350 mM acrylamide.
At the same time, essentially no saturation of quenching is observed
in their presence. In fact, the profiles follow the traditional one-fluorophore
Stern–Volmer linear relationship well. This suggests that either
one or both dansyl fluorophore(s) is(are) sterically less accessible
to the quencher all or part of the time. A simple explanation for
this behavior is that both β-SPGG-8 and UFH induce conformational
changes in and around the active site that reduce steric and dynamic
accessibility to probes as small as the acrylamide.
Figure 4
Quenching of dansyl fluorescence
of DEGR-factor XIa by acrylamide
in the absence (□) and presence of 20 μM β-SPGG-8
(●) and 20 μM UFH (Δ). Fluorescence intensity at
547 (λEX = 345 nm) was recorded following sequential
addition of acrylamide. Solid lines represents fits to the data using
either eq 2 (●, Δ) or 3 (□).
Quenching of dansyl fluorescence
of DEGR-factor XIa by acrylamide
in the absence (□) and presence of 20 μM β-SPGG-8
(●) and 20 μM UFH (Δ). Fluorescence intensity at
547 (λEX = 345 nm) was recorded following sequential
addition of acrylamide. Solid lines represents fits to the data using
either eq 2 (●, Δ) or 3 (□).
Thermodynamic Affinity
of SPGG Variants for FXIa
Although
the inhibition potency of SPGG variants has been rigorously defined,
their thermodynamic affinity remains unknown. A fundamental question
that arises here is whether thermodynamic affinity, i.e., KD, is in the range of IC50 as predicted
by Cheng and Prusoff[41] for allosteric inhibitors.
In general, the affinity of saccharide and nonsaccharide ligands for
various coagulation proteins, such as antithrombin, thrombin, and
FXIa, have been measured using intrinsic[42−44] as well as
extrinsic[38,45] fluorescence probes. For example, heparins
induce a 30–40% increase in intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence
of antithrombin,[42] while sucrose octasulfate
decrease the intrinsic fluorescence of thrombin by 5–10%.[44] For nonsaccharide ligands, sulfated tetrahydroisoquinolines[45] and low molecular weight lignins[43] induce a decrease in antithrombin and plasmin
fluorescence, while sulfated QAO dimers induce a 50–90% increase
in the fluorescence of DEGR-FXIa.[38] Thus,
we used both tryptophan and dansyl as probes of FXIa interaction to
measure the affinity of β-SPGG-2 (4c), β-SPGG-8
(4f), UFH, and H8.A saturating decrease of ∼94%
in the intrinsic fluorescence of FXIa was measured for β-SPGG-2
at pH 7.4 and 37 °C, which could be fitted using the standard
quadratic binding eq 4 to calculate a KD of 2.0 ± 0.2 μM (Figure 5A). Likewise, β-SPGG-2 binding to DEGR-FXIa
induced a 16 ± 1% loss in the fluorescence of the dansyl group
(Figure 5B), which implied an affinity of 0.44
± 0.1 μM (Table 2). It was interesting
to find that the emission wavelength of DEGR-FXIa underwent a significant
6 nm blue-shift in the presence of saturating β-SPGG-2 as compared
to that in its absence (Figure 5C), further
supporting the conclusion of long-range conformational coupling between
β-SPGG-2 and the active site of FXIa. The higher sulfated variant
β-SPGG-8 displayed very similar properties as β-SPGG-2
(not shown). These findings suggest that β-SPGG-2 (and β-SPGG-8)
bind potently to FXIa. The inhibition potency of 0.41 μM for
β-SPGG-2 (Table 1) is essentially identical
to the thermodynamic affinity of 0.44 μM, supporting the classic
allosteric mechanism of inhibition. At the same time, a small difference
in affinity was noted for two types of measurements: tryptophan and
dansyl fluoresence. At the present time, the reason for this difference
is not clear.
Figure 5
Spectrofluorimetric measurement of the affinity of full-length
factor XIa (A) and factor XIa–DEGR (B) for β-SPGG-2,
UFH, and H8 at pH 7.4 and 37 °C using intrinsic tryptophan (A,
λEM = 348 nm, λEX = 280 nm) or dansyl
(B, λEM = 547 nm, λEX = 345 nm)
fluorescence. Solid lines represent nonlinear regressional fits using
quadratic eq 4. (C) Change in the fluorescence
emission spectrum of DEGR-factor XIa (λEX = 345 nm)
induced by the interaction with β-SPGG-2 at pH 7.4 and 37 °C.
Table 2
Dissociation Equilibrium
Constants
(KD) and Maximal Fluorescence Change (ΔFMAX) for the Interactions of SPGG Variants,
UFH, and H8 with Human Factor XIa and DEGR-Factor XIaa
enzyme
KD (μM)
ΔFMAX (%)
β-SPGG-2 (4c)
factor XIab
2.0 ± 0.2
–94 ± 2
DEGR-factor XIac
0.4 ± 0.1
–16 ± 1
β-SPGG-8
(4f)
factor XIa
1.9 ± 0.2
–94 ± 2
DEGR-factor XIa
0.20 ± 0.07
–16 ± 1
UFH
factor XIa
1.1 ± 0.3
–75 ± 3
DEGR-factor XIa
1.6 ± 0.5
–29 ± 2
H8
factor XIa
0.9 ± 0.2
–68 ± 2
DEGR-factor XIa
0.9 ± 0.2
–29 ± 1
Errors represent
standard error
calculated using global fit of the data.
Measured using the intrinsic tryptophan
fluorescence change in pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C. See Experimental Procedures for details.
Measured using the dansyl fluorescence
change in pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C. See Experimental
Procedures for details.
Spectrofluorimetric measurement of the affinity of full-length
factor XIa (A) and factor XIa–DEGR (B) for β-SPGG-2,
UFH, and H8 at pH 7.4 and 37 °C using intrinsic tryptophan (A,
λEM = 348 nm, λEX = 280 nm) or dansyl
(B, λEM = 547 nm, λEX = 345 nm)
fluorescence. Solid lines represent nonlinear regressional fits using
quadratic eq 4. (C) Change in the fluorescence
emission spectrum of DEGR-factor XIa (λEX = 345 nm)
induced by the interaction with β-SPGG-2 at pH 7.4 and 37 °C.Errors represent
standard error
calculated using global fit of the data.Measured using the intrinsic tryptophan
fluorescence change in pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C. See Experimental Procedures for details.Measured using the dansyl fluorescence
change in pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C. See Experimental
Procedures for details.To compare the FXIa−β-SPGG-2 interaction with that
of UFH and H8, the affinities of the latter two saccharides were measured
using intrinsic tryptophan (plasma FXIa) and dansyl fluorescence (DEGR-FXIa).
Both UFH and H8 showed a saturating decrease in tryptophan fluorescence,
albeit with a smaller ΔFMAX of 75
± 3% and 68 ± 2%, respectively (Table 2, Figure 5A). In contrast, the ΔFMAX of DEGR-FXIa complexes with UFH and H8 decreased
more than that for DEGR-FXIa−β-SPGG-2 complex (Table 2, Figure 5B). The KDs calculated for UFH and H8 by both methods
were essentially identical and in-between those measured for β-SPGG-2
using the two probes (Table 2). Finally, the
emission wavelength of DEGR-FXIa in the presence of UFH and H8 displayed
∼2 nm and ∼3 nm blue-shift, respectively (see Supporting Information Figure S3), as compared
to that in their absence. These results indicate that β-SPGG-2
interaction with FXIa appears to exhibit similar biochemical properties
as that for UFH and H8. Measurable differences are evident in the
maximal fluorescence changes and affinity for DEGR-FXIa interaction
with the three ligands, but overall, these properties suggest that
allosteric interaction of β-SPGG-2 with FXIa is generally similar
to that of the heparins.
Thermodynamic Affinity of SPGG Variants for
Factor XI, the Zymogen
The zymogen factor XI also possesses
anion-binding site(s) in the
manner similar to FXIa.[21,22,46] Although these sites on the zymogen are yet to be fully characterized,
we wondered whether SPGG variants would recognize FXI. Such an interaction,
if potent and specific, would be extremely useful because it would
support the idea that the zymogen could be effectively used as an
SPGG scavenging agent in hypothetical events of accidental overdose.
The FXI affinities of β-SPGG-2 and β-SPGG-8 were measured
using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence, which decreased by 95–97%
at pH 7.4 and 37 °C, giving KDs of
1.0 ± 0.2 and 1.8 ± 0.2 μM, respectively (Figure 6). This is a striking result because it implies
that both SPGG variants bind to the zymogen with approximately the
same affinity as the enzyme. Although not absolutely necessary, the
equivalence of affinities may indicate equivalence of the anion-binding
site(s) on the two proteins. Likewise, the affinities of UFH and H8
for FXI were found to be 1.2 ± 0.3 and 1.8 ± 0.4 μM,
respectively (Figure 6), suggesting similarity
between SPGG variants and sulfated saccharides.
Figure 6
Spectrofluorimetric measurement
of the affinity of full-length
factor XI for β-SPGG-2 (○), β-SPGG-8 (■),
UFH (●), and H8 (◇) at pH 7.4 and 37 °C using intrinsic
tryptophan fluorescence (λEM = 348 nm, λEX = 280 nm). Solid lines represent nonlinear regressional
fits using quadratic eq 4
Spectrofluorimetric measurement
of the affinity of full-length
factor XI for β-SPGG-2 (○), β-SPGG-8 (■),
UFH (●), and H8 (◇) at pH 7.4 and 37 °C using intrinsic
tryptophan fluorescence (λEM = 348 nm, λEX = 280 nm). Solid lines represent nonlinear regressional
fits using quadratic eq 4
Interestingly, SPGG Variants Compete Variably with UFH for Binding
to the Catalytic Domain of FXIa
Heparin binds to FXIa in
two sites; in the A3 domain (K252, K253, and K255) and in the catalytic
domain (K529, R530, R532, K535, and K539). To identify whether SPGG
variants engage the A3 domain or the catalytic domain or both, we
studied β-SPGG-2 and β-SPGG-8 inhibition of recombinant
catalytic domain (FXIa-CD) and compared the results to that of the
full-length FXIa. The IC50s were measured using chromogenic
substrate hydrolysis assay under physiologically relevant conditions
(Table 3). CD-FXIa was inhibited by β-SPGG-2
with an IC50 of 1.19 ± 0.08 μg/mL as opposed
to 0.80 ± 0.02 μg/mL for the full length FXIa. β-SPGG-8
inhibited CD-FXIa with an IC50 of 0.9 ± 0.1 μg/mL
as opposed to 0.15 ± 0.01 μg/mL for the full length FXIa.
This suggested that the two SPGG variants bind potently to the catalytic
domain alone. Whereas the difference between IC50s is small,
or most probably insignificant, for β-SPGG-2, the difference
is more substantial for β-SPGG-8. However, even this difference
could possibly arise from the difference in glycosylation of the two
proteins; human plasma full-length FXIa and recombinant CD-FXIa. Thus,
we suggest that SPGG variants primarily target the catalytic domain
of FXIa.
Table 3
Inhibition of Full-Length Human Factor
XIa and Recombinant Factor XIa Catalytic Domain (CD-FXIa) by β-SPGG-2
and β-SPGG-8 at pH 7.4 and 37 °Ca
SPGG variant
FXIa variant
IC50 (μg/mL)
HS
ΔY
β-SPGG-2 (4c)
full-length
0.80 ± 0.02b
1.0 ± 0.1
100 ± 2
CD-FXIa
1.19 ± 0.08
1.8 ± 0.4
106 ± 6
β-SPGG-8
(4f)
full-length
0.15 ± 0.01
1.5 ± 0.2
97 ± 2
CD-FXIa
0.9 ± 0.1
1.2 ± 0.3
97 ± 8
IC50, HS, and ΔY values were obtained following
nonlinear regression analysis
of direct inhibition of human factor XIa, thrombin, and factor Xa
in pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C. Inhibition was monitored by spectrophotometric
measurement of the residual enzyme activity. See details under Experimental Procedures.
Errors represent standard error
calculated using global fit of the data.
IC50, HS, and ΔY values were obtained following
nonlinear regression analysis
of direct inhibition of humanfactor XIa, thrombin, and factor Xa
in pH 7.4 buffer at 37 °C. Inhibition was monitored by spectrophotometric
measurement of the residual enzyme activity. See details under Experimental Procedures.Errors represent standard error
calculated using global fit of the data.To further assess if the SPGG variants bind close
to the heparin-binding
site, we measured the IC50s of FXIa inhibition by four
SPGG variants in the presence of increasing concentrations of UFH.
The logic behind these experiments is that inhibition by SPGG variants
should be made more and more dysfunctional as the concentration of
UFH increases if the two ligands compete well (the polysaccharide
does not inhibit FXIa). Figure 7A shows the
change in dose–response profiles of β-SPGG-8 (4f) inhibiting FXIa in the presence of UFH at pH 7.4 and 37 °C.
As the concentration of UFH increased from 0 to 500 μM, the
IC50 of FXIa inhibition increased from 0.16 to 1.17 μg/mL,
a 7.3-fold change. This suggests very weak competition between the
two ligands. In contrast, the IC50 of FXIa inhibition by
β-SPGG-2 (4c) increased from 0.96 to 86.2 μg/mL,
a 86-fold change, as UFH increased from 0 to 300 μM (Figure 7B). This suggested a much more substantial competition
between β-SPGG-2 (4c) and UFH (see Supportion Information Table S3). Likewise, there
was approximately a 10-fold increase in the IC50 of FXIa
inhibition by β-SPGG-0.5 (4a) and β-SPGG-1
(4b) in the presence of only 100 μM UFH (Figure 7C,D). In combination, the results suggest that SPGG
variants 4a–4c that are relatively
less sulfated than variant 4f compete much better with
UFH. Alternatively, less sulfated variants appear to bind to the heparin-binding
site on the catalytic domain, whereas the higher sulfated SPGG variant
perhaps recognizes anion-binding sites beyond the heparin-binding
site on the catalytic domain. This aspect is discussed more in the Conclusions and Significance section.
Figure 7
Competitive
direct inhibition of factor XIa by β-SPGG-8 (4f) (A), β-SPGG-2 (4c) (B), β-SPGG-1
(4b) (C), and β-SPGG-0.5 (4a) (D)
in the presence of UFH. The inhibition was determined spectrophotometrically
at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. Solid lines represent fits by the dose–response
eq 1 to obtain the IC50,predicted, as described in Experimental Procedures. The concentrations of UFH selected for the study are provided.
Competitive
direct inhibition of factor XIa by β-SPGG-8 (4f) (A), β-SPGG-2 (4c) (B), β-SPGG-1
(4b) (C), and β-SPGG-0.5 (4a) (D)
in the presence of UFH. The inhibition was determined spectrophotometrically
at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. Solid lines represent fits by the dose–response
eq 1 to obtain the IC50,predicted, as described in Experimental Procedures. The concentrations of UFH selected for the study are provided.
Contribution of Ionic and
Nonionic Forces to β-SPGG-2–FXIa
Interaction
Although the SPGG–FXIa interaction is
likely to be electrostatically driven, nonionic forces may contribute
to a significant extent, as noted for heparin–antithrombin
interaction.[42] A high nonionic binding
energy component enhances the specificity of interaction because most
nonionic forces, e.g., hydrogen bonding, cation−π interactions,
and others depend strongly on the distance and orientation of interacting
pair of molecules.[47] In comparison, ionic
bonds are nondirectional and less dependent on distance, which tends
to enhance initial interaction but offer less selectivity of recognition.
To determine the nature of interactions between β-SPGG-2 and
FXIa, the observed equilibrium dissociation constant (KD,obs) was measured as a function of ionic strength of
the medium at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. The KD,obs for β-SPGG-2 binding to DEGR-factor XIa was measured in spectrofluorometric
titrations at various salt concentrations, as described above. The KD,obs decreased ∼4-fold from 0.44 ±
0.10 to 0.11 ± 0.02 μM as the salt concentration decreased
from 150 to 25 mM (see Table S4 and Figures S4
and S5).The protein–polyelectrolyte theory[42,48] indicates that the contribution of nonionic forces to an interaction,
similar to FXIa–SPGG, can be quantified from the intercept
of a double log plot (Figure 8). The slope
of such a linear profile corresponds to the number of ion-pair interactions
(Z) and the fraction of monovalent counterions released
per negative charge following ligand binding (Ψ), while the
intercepts correspond to the nonionic affinity (KD,NI). β-SPGG-2 exhibited a slope of 0.71 ±
0.13 and intercept of −5.77 ± 0.16 (Table 4). This indicates a binding energy due to ionic forces (ΔG0I) of ∼1.0 kcal/mol at pH
7.4, I 0.15, and a binding energy due to nonionic
forces of ∼8.21 kcal/mol (ΔG0NI). Similarly, fluorescence titrations were performed
for UFH and H8 interacting with DEGR-FXIa, and the results are presented
in Figure 8 and Table 4. The free energies of binding due to ionic forces (ΔG0I) at pH 7.4, I 0.15 were calculated to be 1.03 and 0.75 kcal/mol for UFH and H8,
respectively, while the nonionic contribution was 7.38 and 7.08 kcal/mol,
respectively (Table 4).
Figure 8
Dependence of the equilibrium
dissociation constant of β-SPGG-2–DEGR-factor
XIa complex on the concentration of sodium ion in the medium at pH
7.4 and 37 °C. The KD,obs of β-SPGG-2
(◇), UFH (○), and H8 (□) binding to DEGR-factor
XIa was measured through spectrophotometric titrations. Solid lines
represent linear regression fits using eq 5.
Error bars in symbols represent standard deviation of the mean from
at least two experiments. Symbols without apparent error bars indicate
that the standard error was smaller than the size of the symbol.
Table 4
Salt Dependence of
Affinity Studies
for β-SPGG-2, UFH, and H8 at pH 7.4 and 37 °C
slopea
Za
intercepta
KD,NI (μM)
ΔG0NI (kcal/mol)
ΔG0NI (%)b
β-SPGG-2
0.71 ± 0.13c
0.87 ± 0.16
–5.77 ± 0.16
1.7 ± 0.3
8.2 ± 0.1
88.6
UFH
0.73 ± 0.20
0.89 ± 0.24
–5.14 ± 0.25
7.2 ± 0.3
7.3 ± 0.03
87.4
H8
0.52 ± 0.03
0.64 ± 0.04
–5.00 ± 0.04
10.1 ± 0.4
7.1 ± 0.02
90.5
Slope, Z, and intercept
were calculated from linear regressional analysis of log KD,obs versus log[Na] as defined by eq 4.
Nonionic binding
energy contribution
to the total is expressed as percentage.
Error represent standard error calculated
using global fit of the data.
Dependence of the equilibrium
dissociation constant of β-SPGG-2–DEGR-factor
XIa complex on the concentration of sodium ion in the medium at pH
7.4 and 37 °C. The KD,obs of β-SPGG-2
(◇), UFH (○), and H8 (□) binding to DEGR-factor
XIa was measured through spectrophotometric titrations. Solid lines
represent linear regression fits using eq 5.
Error bars in symbols represent standard deviation of the mean from
at least two experiments. Symbols without apparent error bars indicate
that the standard error was smaller than the size of the symbol.Slope, Z, and intercept
were calculated from linear regressional analysis of log KD,obs versus log[Na] as defined by eq 4.Nonionic binding
energy contribution
to the total is expressed as percentage.Error represent standard error calculated
using global fit of the data.In combination, the results for β-SPGG-2 interacting with
FXIa are similar to that for UFH and H8. Although each of these molecules
is highly negatively charged, the resolution of the nature of forces
involved in recognition shows that nearly 88.6% of binding energy
for β-SPGG-2 arises from nonionic forces. The nonionic contribution
is 87.4% and 90.5% for UFH and H8, respectively (Table 4). The number of ion-pairs formed in the interaction for β-SPGG-2,
UFH, and H8 are 0.875, 0.908, and 0.654, respectively. This suggests
that β-SPGG-2 most probably utilizes site(s) on FXIa similar
to heparins. β-SPGG-2 is the first small GAG mimetic with such
a high nonionic binding energy contribution and may encompass interactions
that afford highly selective recognition. The origin of the nonionic
interactions is unclear at the present time, however, the majority
of forces most probably arise from hydrogen bonds with multiple sulfate
groups. It is unlikely that cation−π interactions play
any significant role in β-SPGG-2 interactions because such interactions
should be nonexistent for UFH and H8, both of which also exhibit high
proportion of nonionic contribution.
SPGG Variants Mainly Target
the Intrinsic Coagulation Pathway
and Do Not Affect the Serpin Pathway of Anticoagulation
Our
earlier studies on human plasma anticoagulation indicated that SPGG
primarily targets the intrinsic pathway of coagulation, as predicted
on the basis of direct FXIa inhibition.[37] To assess whether altered sulfation levels modify this property,
we measured the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin
time (APTT) of pooled human plasma in the presence of β-SPGG-2
and β-SPGG-8. The concentrations of β-SPGG-2 and β-SPGG-8
required to double APTT were measured to be 49 and 10 μM, respectively
(Table 5). In comparison, the PT values were
measured to be 152 and 155 μM, respectively, for the two SPGG
variants. These results imply that the SPGG variants retain their
intrinsic pathway targeting ability, as expected. Furthermore, the
5-fold higher potency of β-SPGG-8 relative to β-SPGG-2
in APTT assay was identical to the difference observed in chromogenic
substrate hydrolysis assay.
Table 5
Plasma Clotting Times
of Two SPGG
Variantsa
concentration
inhibitor
plasma
test
(μg/mL)
(μM)
β-SPGG-2 (4c)
normal
APTT
96
49
PT
298
152
β-SPGG-8 (4f)
normal
APTT
20
10
PT
308
155
factor XI-deficient
APTT
77
39
antithrombin-deficient
APTT
22
11
heparin cofactor II-deficient
APTT
23
12
Prolongation of clotting time as
a function of concentration of SPGG variants in either the activated
partial thromboplastin time assay (APTT) or the prothrombin time assay
(PT). Clotting assays were performed in duplicate (SE ≤ 5%)
as described in the Experimental Procedures.
Prolongation of clotting time as
a function of concentration of SPGG variants in either the activated
partial thromboplastin time assay (APTT) or the prothrombin time assay
(PT). Clotting assays were performed in duplicate (SE ≤ 5%)
as described in the Experimental Procedures.We also used PT and APTT
assays to uncover other possible targets
of SPGG variants, if any, in exhibiting anticoagulation. In particular,
antithrombin and heparin cofactor II are two serpins that have been
known to possess heparin binding sites that mediate indirect inhibition
of coagulation proteases.[42,49] Thus, if SPGG variants
exhibit plasma anticoagulation by binding to these serpins, then their
absence should increase APTT. A 2-fold increase in APTT required β-SPGG-8
at 11 or 12 μM levels in plasma deficient in antithrombin or
heparin cofactor II, respectively (Table 5).
This suggests that the anticoagulant potency of β-SPGG-8 remains
unaffected by the absence of two key serpins. Yet, a 4-fold increase
in β-SPGG-8 levels is necessary to induce anticoagulation in
plasma deficient of FXI (Table 5). Thus, the
pooled plasma studies indicate that the anticoagulant activity of
SPGG variants arises primarily from inhibition of the intrinsic coagulation
pathway and does not involve two key heparin-binding serpins.
Conclusions
and Significance
Although FXIa is similar to other trypsin-related
coagulation enzymes,
it is fundamentally different on structural and mechanistic fronts.
It functions as a dimer, whereas all other factors function as monomers.[50] Additionally, FXI can be activated to FXIa in
a stepwise manner with widely different rates of activation,[50] suggesting a strong possibility that the two
monomers are sampling different conformational states in a dimer.
This suggests a fairly high level of cooperativity between the two
monomers. The occurrence of such cooperativity is critical for allosteric
induction of function/dysfunction. The acylamide quenching studies
(Figure 4) support the idea that SPGG variants
are able to exploit the dynamics inherent in FXIa to allosterically
affect the conformational state of the catalytic domain. Such allosteric
modulation bodes well for discovering variable efficacy inhibitors.
Although each SPGG variant was found to induce ∼100% inhibition
efficacy (Table 1), appropriate structural
variation in the scaffold, or pendant groups, may be able to modulate
the inherent dynamics so as to induce less than perfect efficacy.
A future goal of the program would be to discover variable efficacy
modulators rather than inhibitors of FXIa.The analysis of forces
contributing to FXIa–SPGG interaction
led to a rather unexpected result. Despite the presence of numerous
sulfate groups on a small scaffold, ionic forces were not the dominant
contributors. This is in striking contrast to interactions of proteins
with natural GAGs, e.g., heparin, that display 40–80% ionic
contribution,[42,51] and similar to interactions of
proteins with aromatic GAG mimetics, e.g., sulfated flavonoids and
sulfated lignins.[52,53] This work adds to the growing
body of evidence that aromatic mimetics of GAGs inherently bind proteins
with higher nonionic binding energy, which is expected to induce higher
specificity of interaction.Although we could not prepare per-sulfated
variant of SPGG and
the difference in the level of sulfation was only about two sulfate
groups across the range studied, key results were revealed by studying
the eight variants. One, higher levels of sulfation, as with β-SPGG-8,
appear to enhance interactions with thrombin and factor Xa, which
implies a loss of specificity (probably 2–3-fold). This implies
that although the potency against FXIa increases, this may not be
desirable. Two, too low a level of sulfation, as with β-SPGG-0.5,
is also not desirable because the potency reduces significantly. A
moderate level of sulfation, e.g., corresponding to β-SPGG-1
or β-SPGG-2, is likely to exhibit optimal combination of potency
and specificity. Compositional profile (Figure 1) reveals that this corresponds to about decasulfated PGG scaffold.
Considering anomeric SPGG variants yield identical results, this implies
that the presence of 10 sulfate groups on aromatic rings at positions
2 through 6 on the α/β-glucose scaffold. On the basis
of results with inhibitor 5, we hypothesize that these
10 sulfate groups could be distributed equally at positions 3 and
5 of the five aromatic rings, as observed earlier on sulfation of
the 3,4,5-trihydroxyphenyl scaffold.[54,55] This provides
an approximate optimal SPGG structure that can be expected to show
desired inhibition function without loss of specificity. Yet, this
does not imply that all 10 sulfate groups distributed in an essentially
symmetric fashion are all important for FXIa recognition. It is more
likely that fewer sulfate groups placed at key positions induce allosteric
dysfunction of FXIa. In fact, results with inhibitor 5 indicate that a more potent variant is perhaps likely to arise from
a slightly different arrangement of sulfate groups. Identification
of this SPGG species is important and likely to be challenging. Perhaps
advanced studies involving site-directed mutagenesis, X-ray cocrystallography
and/or GOLD-based combinatorial virtual library screening of all possible
SPGG species binding to FXIa may help identify the best SPGG variant
to pursue in preclinical studies.A key result achieved in these
studies relates to competitive studies
with UFH. Different SPGG variants display different levels of competition
with UFH (Figure 7). Whereas effective competition
with UFH was apparent for less sulfated variants (β-SPGG-2,
−1 and −0.5), the inhibitory effect of β-SPGG-8
could not be displaced with UFH. This suggests significant differences
in interactions between SPGG variants. As described in the Introduction, the catalytic domain of FXIa possesses
two distinct electropositive sites. Site 1 is the traditional heparin-binding
site and consists of residues K529, R530, R532, K536, and K540 (Figure 9).[23] This site is approximately
24 Å away from another group of basic residues (R504, K505, R507,
and K509), which have been implicated in inhibition mechanism involving
serpins.[24] Site 1, or the heparin-binding
site, is known to be allosterically coupled to the catalytic triad,[24] but unambiguous information on such coupling
is lacking for site 2. This work suggests that higher sulfated level
enhances binding to both sites, presumably simultaneous, and induces
allosteric inhibition. In contrast, lower sulfated variants bind preferentially
to site 1 only to induce allosteric inhibition. If so, the work suggests
that even site 2 is allosterically linked to the catalytic triad in
an inhibitory fashion because presence of high levels of UFH, which
is expected to compete effectively with the ligand bound at site 1,
is not able to reverse inhibition. The results have major implications
for clinical relevance and highlight directions to undertake for future
SPGG-based allosteric modulators.
Figure 9
Structure of factor XIa catalytic domain.
The crystal structure
of factor XIa (PDB ID: 2FDA) shows the presence of two highly electropositive
sites that are hypothesized to engage SPGG variants. Site 1 is the
traditional heparin-binding site and contains residues K529, R530,
R532, K536, and K540, while site 2 is another site containing residues
R504, K505, R507, and K509. FXIa is shown in cartoon representation
(gray), where the residues in the catalytic domain I and II are shown
as spheres colored by atom type.
Structure of factor XIa catalytic domain.
The crystal structure
of factor XIa (PDB ID: 2FDA) shows the presence of two highly electropositive
sites that are hypothesized to engage SPGG variants. Site 1 is the
traditional heparin-binding site and contains residues K529, R530,
R532, K536, and K540, while site 2 is another site containing residues
R504, K505, R507, and K509. FXIa is shown in cartoon representation
(gray), where the residues in the catalytic domain I and II are shown
as spheres colored by atom type.A final result of considerable clinical value is the discovery
that SPGG variants bind to zymogen factor XI with essentially identical
affinity as FXIa. Comparison of crystal structures of FXI and FXIa
reveals that sites 1 and 2 (above) of the catalytic domain are equally
exposed and oriented in both proteins (not shown). This could be the
reason for equivalence of affinities of SPGG variants. The results
suggest that zymogen FXI could be used to scavenge excessive SPGG
from plasma/blood, if needed. This might provide a fine avenue for
a simple antidote therapy. Such a tool is expected to be very important
for addressing issues observed with the current TSOA therapy.In conclusion, we have identified important structural constituents
that govern selective, allosteric inhibition of FXIa. Our work has
led to the discovery that zymogen factor XI could possibly be used
as an antidote in a hypothetical anticoagulation therapy with SPGG.
The results suggest the possibility that SPGG may recognize more than
one anion-binding site on FXIa and highlight directions to undertake
in achieving clinical relevance.
Experimental
Procedures
Chemicals and Reagents
Organic solvents for synthesis
and UPLC analysis were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI)
or Fisher (Pittsburgh, PA) and used as such. Chemical reactions sensitive
to air or moisture were carried out under nitrogen atmosphere in oven-dried
glassware. Reagent solutions, unless otherwise noted, were handled
under a nitrogen atmosphere using syringe techniques. n-Hexylamine for ion-pairing UPLC was from Acros Organics (Morris
Plains, NJ). BovineUFH was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
MO). H8 was purchased from V-Laboratories (Covington, LA). 3,4,5-Tribenzyloxybenzoic
acid, 3,5-dibenzyloxybenzoic acid, α-d-glucose, β-d-glucose, and α,β-d-glucose were purchased
from TCI America (Philadelphia, PA).Pooled normal human plasma
for coagulation assays was purchased from Valley Biomedical (Winchester,
VA). Activated partial thromboplastin time reagent containing ellagic
acid (APTT-LS), thromboplastin-D, and 25 mM CaCl2 were
obtained from Fisher Diagnostics (Middletown, VA). FXI deficient plasma
was from Haematologic Technologies (Essex Junction, VT), whereas antithrombin
and heparincofactor II deficient plasmas were from Affinity Biologicals
Inc. (Ancaster, ON).
Proteins and Chromogenic Substrates
Human plasma proteins
including thrombin, factors Xa, XIa, FXIa-DEGR, and XI were obtained
from Haematologic Technologies (Essex Junction, VT). Stock solutions
of factors XIa, XI, and thrombin were prepared in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer,
pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% PEG8000, and 0.02% Tween80. Stock
solution of factor Xa was prepared in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4,
containing 100 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 0.1% PEG8000, and
0.02% Tween80. Chromogenic substrates including Spectrozyme TH (H-d-cyclohexylalanyl-Ala-Arg-p-nitroanilide) and Spectrozyme factor Xa (methoxycarbonyl-d-cyclohexylglycyl-Gly-Arg-p-nitroanilide) were obtained
from American Diagnostica (Greenwich, CT). S-2366 (l-PyroGlu-Pro-Arg-p-nitroaniline HCl) was obtained from Diapharma (West Chester,
OH). FXIa-CD was a gift from Dr. Alireza Rezaie of Saint Louis University.
Chromatography and Spectroscopic Analysis
Analytical
TLC was performed using UNIPLATE silica gel GHLF 250 μ precoated
plates (ANALTECH, Newark, DE). Flash chromatography was performed
using Teledyne ISCO Combiflash RF system (Lincoln, NE) and disposable
normal phase silica cartridges of 30–50 μ particle size,
230–400 mesh size, and 60 Å pore size. The mobile phase
gradients in flash chromatography used hexanes/EtOAc and CH2Cl2/CH3OH mixtures for resolving unsulfated
precursors. Sulfated derivatives were purified using Sephadex G10
size exclusion chromatography with deionized water as the mobile phase.
The quaternary ammonium counterion of sulfate moieties was exchanged
for sodium ion using SPSephadex-Na cation exchange chromatography.
Regeneration of the cation exchange column was performed with 500
mL of 2 M NaCl solution.Each compound was characterized using 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, which was performed
using Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer in either CDCl3, acetone-d6, or D2O. Signals (in ppm) are either
relative to the internal standard (tetramethyl silane, TMS) or to
the residual peak of the solvent. The NMR data are reported as chemical
shift (ppm), multiplicity of signal (s = singlet, d = doublet, t =
triplet, q = quartet, dd = doublet of doublet, m = multiplet), coupling
constants (Hz), and integration. ESI-MS profiles were recorded using
Waters Acquity TQD MS spectrometer in positive or negative ion mode.
Samples were dissolved in acetonitrile or water and infused at a rate
of 20–100 μL/min. Mass scans were obtained, as reported
earlier.[37] Briefly, for unsulfated intermediates,
mass scans were obtained in the range of 200–700 amu with a
scan time of 1 s. Ionization conditions (capillary voltage = 3–4
kV, cone voltage = 30–230 V , extractor voltage = 3 V, Rf lens
voltage = 0.1 V, source block temperature = 150 °C, desolvation
temperature = ∼250 °C) were optimized for each compound
to maximize parent ion signal. For the sulfated products, a Waters
Acquity H-class UPLC system equipped with a photodiode array detector
and TQD MS was used. A reversed-phase Waters BEH C18 column of particle
size 1.7 μm and 2.1 mm × 50 mm dimensions at 30 ±
2 °C was used for resolving components. Solvent A consisted of
25 mM n-hexylamine in water containing 0.1% (v/v)
formic acid, while solvent B consisted of 25 mM n-hexylamine in acetonitrile–water mixture (3:1 v/v) containing
0.1% (v/v) formic acid. Resolution of each SPGG variant into distinct
peaks was achieved with a flow rate of 500 μL/min and a linear
gradient of 3% solvent B per min over 20 min starting with an initial
composition of 20% (v/v) solvent B. The sample was first detected
by UV absorbance in the range of 190–400 nm and then by ESI-MS
in positive ion mode (capillary voltage = 4 kV, cone voltage = 20
V, desolvation temperature = 350 °C, nitrogen gas flow = 650
L/h). Mass scans were collected multiple times in the range of 1000–2048
amu within 0.25 s and coadded to enhance signal-to-noise ratio. On
the basis of the UPLC-ESI-MS profiles, the purity of the synthesized
SPGG variants was found to be greater than 95%.
General Procedure
for the Synthesis of SPGG Variants
The synthesis of SPGG
variants was achieved by chemical sulfation
of pentagalloyl-d-glucopyranoside anomeric derivatives (β-PGG
(3a), α-PGG (3b), or their natural
mixture (3c)) (see Scheme 1).
The synthesis of the precursors 3a, 3b,
or 3c was achieved in two steps: DCC-mediated esterification
with 3,4,5-tribenzyloxybenzoic acid and palladium-catalyzed per-debenzylation,
from either α-glucose or β-glucose (or their natural mixture),
respectively, following methods reported in the literature (see Supporting Information).[40] Eight variants of SPGG (Scheme 1), labeled
as β-SPGG-0.5 (4a), β-SPGG-1 (4b), β-SPGG-2 (4c), β-SPGG-4 (4d), β-SPGG-6 (4e), β-SPGG-8 (4f), α-SPGG-8 (4g), and α,β-SPGG (4h), were quantitatively synthesized following the protocol
of microwave-assisted sulfation with N(CH3)3:SO3 complex, reported earlier for nonsaccharideGAG mimetics,[37,54,55] except for varying the reaction
time from 0.5 to 8 h, as denoted by the number following the SPGG
label. These derivatives were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and UPLC-MS, as described earlier.[37] The UPLC profile of the derivatives in combination with
MS identification of component masses was used to calculate the average
molecular weights of the SPGG variants (see Supporting
Information Table S1 and Figures S1 and S2). On the basis of
the UPLC-ESI-MS profile, SPGG variants do not contain any species
other than the sulfated PGG species. Thus, the purity of these variants
is estimated to be higher than 95%. Similar procedure was used to
synthesize the decasulfated derivative 5.
Direct Inhibition
Studies
Direct inhibition of the
desired enzyme by 4a–4h and 5 was measured using a chromogenic substrate hydrolysis assay
on a microplate reader (FlexStation III, Molecular Devices), as reported
earlier.[37] Briefly, to each well of a 96-well
microplate containing 85 or 185 μL of 20–50 mM Tris-HCl
buffer, pH 7.4, containing 100–150 mM NaCl, 0.1% PEG8000, and
0.02% Tween80 at either 37 °C (factors XIa and Xa) or 25 °C
(thrombin) was added 5 μL of SPGG variant (or vehicle) and 5
μL of the enzyme. The final concentrations of the enzymes were
0.765 nM (FXIa), 6 nM (thrombin), and 1.09 nM (factor Xa). After 10
min incubation, 5 μL of 6.9 mM S-2366 or 1.0 mM Spectrozyme
TH or 2.5 mM Spectrozyme FXa, was rapidly added and the residual enzyme
activity was measured from the initial rate of increase in A405. Relative residual enzyme activity (Y, activity in the presence of inhibitor to that in its
absence) as a function of the concentration of SPGG variant was fitted
using logistic eq 1 to obtain the potency (IC50), efficacy (ΔY = YM – Y0) and Hill slope (HS) of inhibition. In this
equation, YM and Y0 are the maximal and minimal values of Y.
Michaelis–Menten Kinetics of S-2366 Hydrolysis by FXIa
in the Presence of β-SPGG-8 (4f)
The initial
rate of S-2366 hydrolysis by 0.765 nM FXIa was obtained from the linear
increase in A405 corresponding to less
than 10% consumption of the substrate. The initial rate was measured
at various S-2366 concentrations (0.01–2.0 mM) in the presence
of fixed concentrations of β-SPGG-8 (4f) in 50
mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% PEG8000,
and 0.02% Tween80 at 37 °C. The data was fitted using the standard
Michaelis–Menten to determine the KM and VMAX of catalysis.
Inhibition
of FXIa by SPGG Variants in the Presence of UFH
Inhibition
of FXIa by SPGG variants 4a, 4b, 4c, or 4f was performed in the presence
of UFH using the 96-well microplate format. A 5 μL solution
of SPGG variant (0–10 mg/mL) and 5 μL of FXIa (0.765
nM final concentration) with 5 μL of UFH (0–500 μM)
in 80 μL 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl
and 0.1% PEG8000 was incubated at 37 °C for 5 min followed by
addition of 5 μL of 6.9 mM S-2366. The initial rate of substrate
hydrolysis was measured from the change in A405, and the IC50 was calculated using eq 1.
Quenching of DEGR-FXIa Fluorescence with
Acrylamide
Acrylamide quenching of DEGR-FXIa fluorescence
was studied in 50
mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% PEG8000
at 37 °C. Fluorescence emission of DEGR-FXIa at 547 nm (λEX = 345 nm) was measured in the absence and presence of 20
μM β-SPGG-8 (4c) or 20 μM UFH following
the addition of increasing concentrations of the quencher (Q) acrylamide (0–0.6 M). The excitation and emission
slits were set to 1.0 and 1.5 mm, respectively. Quenching of the DEGR-FXIa
fluorescence intensity was fitted using the classic linear Stern–Volmer
eq 2 or its quadratic derivative eq 3, as described by Lakowicz.[56] In these equations, F0 and F are the fluorescence intensities in the absence and presence of
the quencher, respectively, and K1 and K2 are two different Stern–Volmer constants
for fluorophores present in DEGR-FXIa.or
Fluorescence Spectroscopy-Based
Measurement of the Binding Affinity
Fluorescence experiments
were performed using a QM4 spectrofluorometer
(Photon Technology International, Birmingham, NJ) in 50 mM Tris-HCl
buffer, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% PEG8000 at 37 °C.
The affinity of FXIa, factor XI or DEGR-FXIa for either SPGG variants,
UFH or H8, was measured using either the change in the intrinsic tryptophan
fluorescence (λEM =340 nm, λEX =
280 nm) or dansyl fluorescence (λEM = 547 nm, λEX = 345 nm) at varying concentrations of the ligand (L). The
titrations were performed by adding aliquots of 200–250 μM
aqueous solution of β-SPGG-2 (4c), β-SPGG-8
(4f), UFH, or H8 to 105 nM FXIa or FXI, or 250 nM DEGR-FXIa
and monitoring the fluorescence intensity at the appropriate λEM. The excitation and emission slits were set to 1.0 and 1.5
mm, respectively. The observed change in fluorescence (ΔF) relative to initial fluorescence (F0) was fitted using eq 4 to obtain the
dissociation constant (KD) and the maximal
change in fluorescence (ΔFMAX) at
saturation. Fluorescence emission spectra of DEGR-FXIa (250 nM) in
the absence and presence of 20 μM β-SPGG-2 (4c), 20 μM UFH, or 20 μM H8 were also recorded using λEX of 345 nm. The λEM was scanned from 350–600
nm in increments of 1 nm. The excitation and emission slit widths
were set at 1.0 and 1.5 mm, respectively.
Salt Dependence
of Affinity of DEGR-FXIa for β-SPGG-2
(4c), UFH, and H8
The affinities of DEGR-FXIa
for β-SPGG-2 (4c), UFH, and H8 were measured using
the change in the fluorescence of the active site dansyl group, as
described above, at 37 °C in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing
0.1% PEG8000 and varying salt concentration (25, 50, 100, and 150
mM NaCl). Titrations were performed by adding aliquots of a solution
of β-SPGG-2 (4c) (35–95 μM), UFH (50
μM), or H8 (50 μM) to a fixed concentration of DEGR-FXIa
(250 nM) and using eq 4 to calculate the KD. The contributions of ionic and nonionic binding
energies to the interactions were obtained from slope and intercept
of the linear plot of log KD,obs versus
log [Na+], according to eq 5. In
this equation, KD,NI is the dissociation
constant at [Na+] = 1 M and slope “m” = Z × Ψ, where Z is the number of ion-pairs formed upon binding and Ψ is the
fraction of monovalent counterions released per negative charge following
interaction.[42]
Effects of SPGG Variants
on the PT and APTT of Pooled Human
Plasmas
The effect of two SPGG variants (4c and 4f) on human plasma clotting was measured in a standard one-stage
recalcification assay with a BBL Fibrosystem fibrometer (Becton-Dickinson,
Sparles, MD), as described previously.[37] For prothrombin time (PT) assays, thromboplastin-D was reconstituted
according to the manufacturer’s directions and warmed to 37
°C. Then 10 μL of the SPGG variant solution, to give the
desired concentration, was brought up to 100 μL with citrated
human plasma, incubated for 30 s at 37 °C, followed by addition
of 200 μL of prewarmed thromboplastin-D, and time to clot was
meausred. For the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) assay,
10 μL of SPGG solution was mixed with 90 μL of citrated
human plasma and 100 μL of prewarmed APTT reagent (0.2% ellagic
acid). After incubation for 4 min at 37 °C, clotting was initiated
by adding 100 μL of prewarmed 25 mM CaCl2 and time
to clot was determined. The data were fit to a quadratic trend line,
which was used to determine the concentration of the inhibitor necessary
to double the clotting time. Effect of β-SPGG-8 (4f) on APTT using FXIa-deficient human plasma, antithrombin-deficient
human plasma, or heparin cofactor II-deficient human plasma was studied
in a similar fashion. Clotting time in the absence of an anticoagulant
was determined in a similar fashion using 10 μL of deionized
water and was found to be 18.5 s for PT and 42.5 s for APTT in case
of normal human plasma, 31.5 s for APTT using antithrombin-deficient
plasma, 35.7 s for APTT using heparin cofactor II-deficient plasma,
and 140 s for APTT using FXIa-deficient plasma.
Authors: Tsvetelina I Lazarova; Lei Jin; Michael Rynkiewicz; Joan C Gorga; Frank Bibbins; Harold V Meyers; Robert Babine; James Strickler Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2006-07-28 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Edith A Nutescu; William E Dager; James S Kalus; John J Lewin; Mark D Cipolle Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: A Yamashita; K Nishihira; T Kitazawa; K Yoshihashi; T Soeda; K Esaki; T Imamura; K Hattori; Y Asada Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Malcolm S Buchanan; Anthony R Carroll; Deborah Wessling; Michael Jobling; Vicky M Avery; Rohan A Davis; Yunjiang Feng; Yafeng Xue; Linda Oster; Tomas Fex; Johanna Deinum; John N A Hooper; Ronald J Quinn Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2008-06-26 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Shravan Morla; Nehru Viji Sankaranarayanan; Daniel K Afosah; Megh Kumar; Apparao B Kummarapurugu; Judith A Voynow; Umesh R Desai Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Rami A Al-Horani; Elsamani I Abdelfadiel; Daniel K Afosah; Shravan Morla; Jyothi C Sistla; Bassem Mohammed; Erika J Martin; Masahiro Sakagami; Donald F Brophy; Umesh R Desai Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Rahaman Navaz Gangji; Nehru Viji Sankaranarayanan; James Elste; Rami A Al-Horani; Daniel K Afosah; Rachel Joshi; Vaibhav Tiwari; Umesh R Desai Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 4.345