BACKGROUND: Traditional desks require students to sit; however, recently schools have provided students with nontraditional standing desks. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in caloric expenditure of young adults while sitting at a standard classroom desk and standing at a nontraditional standing classroom desk. METHODS:Twenty (10 male/10 female) young (22.8 ± 1.9 y), healthy participants reported to the laboratory between the hours of 7:00 AM and 2:00 PM following a 12-h fast and 48-h break in exercise. Participants were randomly assigned to perform a series of mathematical problems either sitting at a normal classroom desk or standing at a nontraditional standing desk. Inspired and expired gases were collected for 45-min for the determination of oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and minute ventilation (VE) using a metabolic gas system. RESULTS: There were significant increases from sitting to standing in VO2 (0.22 ± 0.05 vs. 0.28 ± 0.05 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), VCO2 (0.18 ± 0.05 vs. 0.24 ± 0.050 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), VE (7.72 ± 0.67 vs. 9.41 ± 1.20 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), and kilocalories expended per minute (1.36 ± 0.20 kcal/min, P ≤ .0001 vs. 1.02 ± 0.22 kcal/min, P ≤ .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a significant increase in caloric expenditure in subjects that were standing at a standing classroom desk compared with sitting at a standard classroom desk.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Traditional desks require students to sit; however, recently schools have provided students with nontraditional standing desks. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in caloric expenditure of young adults while sitting at a standard classroom desk and standing at a nontraditional standing classroom desk. METHODS: Twenty (10 male/10 female) young (22.8 ± 1.9 y), healthy participants reported to the laboratory between the hours of 7:00 AM and 2:00 PM following a 12-h fast and 48-h break in exercise. Participants were randomly assigned to perform a series of mathematical problems either sitting at a normal classroom desk or standing at a nontraditional standing desk. Inspired and expired gases were collected for 45-min for the determination of oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and minute ventilation (VE) using a metabolic gas system. RESULTS: There were significant increases from sitting to standing in VO2 (0.22 ± 0.05 vs. 0.28 ± 0.05 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), VCO2 (0.18 ± 0.05 vs. 0.24 ± 0.050 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), VE (7.72 ± 0.67 vs. 9.41 ± 1.20 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), and kilocalories expended per minute (1.36 ± 0.20 kcal/min, P ≤ .0001 vs. 1.02 ± 0.22 kcal/min, P ≤ .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a significant increase in caloric expenditure in subjects that were standing at a standing classroom desk compared with sitting at a standard classroom desk.
Authors: Scott D I Campbell; Bradley J Brosnan; Anna K Y Chu; C Murray Skeaff; Nancy J Rehrer; Tracy L Perry; Meredith C Peddie Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Aviroop Biswas; Paul I Oh; Guy E Faulkner; Alis Bonsignore; Maureen T Pakosh; David A Alter Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Pedro B Júdice; Marc T Hamilton; Luís B Sardinha; Theodore W Zderic; Analiza M Silva Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Bethany Barone Gibbs; Andrea L Hergenroeder; Peter T Katzmarzyk; I-Min Lee; John M Jakicic Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Aaron R Caldwell; Kaitlin M Gallagher; Benjamin T Harris; Megan E Rosa-Caldwell; Marcus Payne; Bryce Daniels; Matthew S Ganio Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 3.078