Literature DB >> 22971879

Difference in caloric expenditure in sitting versus standing desks.

Christopher Reiff1, Kara Marlatt, Donald R Dengel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional desks require students to sit; however, recently schools have provided students with nontraditional standing desks. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in caloric expenditure of young adults while sitting at a standard classroom desk and standing at a nontraditional standing classroom desk.
METHODS: Twenty (10 male/10 female) young (22.8 ± 1.9 y), healthy participants reported to the laboratory between the hours of 7:00 AM and 2:00 PM following a 12-h fast and 48-h break in exercise. Participants were randomly assigned to perform a series of mathematical problems either sitting at a normal classroom desk or standing at a nontraditional standing desk. Inspired and expired gases were collected for 45-min for the determination of oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and minute ventilation (VE) using a metabolic gas system.
RESULTS: There were significant increases from sitting to standing in VO2 (0.22 ± 0.05 vs. 0.28 ± 0.05 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), VCO2 (0.18 ± 0.05 vs. 0.24 ± 0.050 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), VE (7.72 ± 0.67 vs. 9.41 ± 1.20 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), and kilocalories expended per minute (1.36 ± 0.20 kcal/min, P ≤ .0001 vs. 1.02 ± 0.22 kcal/min, P ≤ .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a significant increase in caloric expenditure in subjects that were standing at a standing classroom desk compared with sitting at a standard classroom desk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22971879     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.9.7.1009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  21 in total

Review 1.  Changing the way we work: elevating energy expenditure with workstation alternatives.

Authors:  C Tudor-Locke; J M Schuna; L J Frensham; M Proenca
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 2.  Sedentary Behavior and Body Weight and Composition in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Scott D I Campbell; Bradley J Brosnan; Anna K Y Chu; C Murray Skeaff; Nancy J Rehrer; Tracy L Perry; Meredith C Peddie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The energy expenditure benefits of reallocating sedentary time with physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aviroop Biswas; Paul I Oh; Guy E Faulkner; Alis Bonsignore; Maureen T Pakosh; David A Alter
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.341

Review 4.  Active workstations to fight sedentary behaviour.

Authors:  Tine Torbeyns; Stephen Bailey; Inge Bos; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Stand-Biased Versus Seated Classrooms and Childhood Obesity: A Randomized Experiment in Texas.

Authors:  Monica L Wendel; Mark E Benden; Hongwei Zhao; Christina Jeffrey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  What is the metabolic and energy cost of sitting, standing and sit/stand transitions?

Authors:  Pedro B Júdice; Marc T Hamilton; Luís B Sardinha; Theodore W Zderic; Analiza M Silva
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Time spent in sedentary posture is associated with waist circumference and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  W W Tigbe; M H Granat; N Sattar; M E J Lean
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Contribution of occupation to high doses of light-intensity activity and cardiovascular risk factors among Mexican American adults.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gay; Harold W Kohl; Jennifer J Salinas; Joseph B McCormick; Susan P Fisher-Hoch
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2013-12-20

9.  Definition, measurement, and health risks associated with sedentary behavior.

Authors:  Bethany Barone Gibbs; Andrea L Hergenroeder; Peter T Katzmarzyk; I-Min Lee; John M Jakicic
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Prolonged standing increases lower limb arterial stiffness.

Authors:  Aaron R Caldwell; Kaitlin M Gallagher; Benjamin T Harris; Megan E Rosa-Caldwell; Marcus Payne; Bryce Daniels; Matthew S Ganio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.