| Literature DB >> 24842597 |
Sara Nørgaard Sørensen1, Anders Baun.
Abstract
The aquatic ecotoxicity testing of nanoparticles is complicated by unstable exposure conditions resulting from various transformation processes of nanoparticles in aqueous suspensions. In this study, we investigated the influence of exposure timing on the algal test response to silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), by reducing the incubation time and by aging the AgNPs in algal medium prior to testing. The freshwater green algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were exposed to AgNO3, NM-300 K (a representative AgNP) and citrate stabilized AgNPs from two different manufacturers (AgNP1 and AgNP2) in a standard algal growth inhibition test (ISO 8692:2004) for 48 h and a short-term (2 h) (14)C-assimilation test. For AgNO3, similar responses were obtained in the two tests, whereas freshly prepared suspensions of citrate stabilized AgNPs were less toxic in the 2-h tests compared to the 48-h tests. The 2-h test was found applicable for dissolved silver, but yielded non-monotonous concentration-response relationships and poor reproducibility for freshly prepared AgNP suspensions. However, when aging AgNPs in algal medium 24 h prior to testing, clear concentration-response patterns emerged and reproducibility increased. Prolonged aging to 48 h increased toxicity in the 2-h tests whereas aging beyond 48 h reduced toxicity. Our results demonstrate that the outcome of algal toxicity testing of AgNPs is highly influenced not only by the test duration, but also by the time passed from the moment AgNPs are added to the test medium. This time-dependency should be considered when nanomaterial dispersion protocols for ecotoxicity testing are developed.Entities:
Keywords: Concentration–response; duration; ecotoxicity; hazard identification; speciation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24842597 PMCID: PMC4424814 DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.913728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanotoxicology ISSN: 1743-5390 Impact factor: 5.913
Figure 1.Overview of the experimental setup for testing the influence of aging (0–7 days) on the characteristics and 2-h algal toxicity of citrate stabilized AgNPs (AgNP1). Seven identical sets of test concentrations covering the range 10–1000 µg Ag L−1 were prepared in ISO 8692 algal medium on day 0 and aged in the dark on a shaker (300 rpm) before testing and characterization was conducted after 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 7 days.
Effective concentrations (EC10- and EC50-values) and 95% confidence intervals in µg Ag L−1 from 2-h 14C-assimilation and 48-h growth inhibition algal tests with AgNO3 and AgNPs (freshly prepared).
| 2 h Algal test | 48 h Algal test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test material | EC10 | EC50 | EC10 | EC50 |
| AgNO3 | 2.2 [1.7;2.9] | 6.0 [5.1;7.1] | 2.1 [1.4;3.2] | 4.9 [3.9;6.2] |
| NM-300 K | 8.7 [6.9;11] | 50 [46;56] | 74 [54;100] | 140 [120;160] |
| AgNP1 | 280 [190;410] | 710 [620;830] | 160 [110;210] | 310 [270;360] |
| AgNP2 | 49 [34;70] | 150 [130;190] | 31 [20;47] | 75 [63;90] |
| AgNO3 (+cysteine) | No data | >240 | 2.0 [1.2;35] | 270 [28;2700] |
| NM-300 K (+cysteine) | No data | >1000 | 9.2 [1.7;50] | 3700 [1400;9900] |
| AgNP1 (+cysteine) | 260 [170;380] | 1800 [680;4800] | 270 [120;600] | 670 [400;1100] |
Figure 2.Concentration–response data and fitted curves by Log457 from 2-h 14C-assimilation algal tests with AgNP1 (A and B) and AgNP2 (C and D) being freshly prepared (A and C) or aged for 24 h in ISO 8692 algal medium in the dark (B and D). For each scenario (A–D) two individual test runs were conducted.
Figure 3.Concentration–response data and fitted curves by Log457 from 2-h algal 14C-assimilation algal tests with AgNP1 after aging in ISO 8692 algal medium (A) for 0–2 days, (B) for 3–5 days, (C) for 7 days. The EC50-values with 95% confidence intervals are plotted for suspensions aged for 05 days (D).
Size and zeta potential measured by DLS for citrate stabilized AgNPs (AgNP1) suspended in ISO algal medium (1 mg Ag L−1) after 0–7 days of aging in the dark on a shaker (300 rpm).
| Aging period (days) | Zeta potential (mV) | Size peak 1 (intensity) (nm) | Size peak 1 (area int.) (%) | Size peak 2 (intensity) (nm) | Size peak 2 (area int.) (%) | Polydispersity index (PDI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | −29 ± 2.2 | 49 ± 0.4 | 66 ± 0.51 | 91 | 11 ± 0.80 | 9 | 0.35 ± 0.02 |
| 1 | −24 ± 2.9 | 44 ± 0.8 | 62 ± 1.8 | 91 | 9.3 ± 0.96 | 9 | 0.33 ± 0.04 |
| 2 | −23 ± 2.3 | 46 ± 4.3 | 57 ± 3.8 | 91 | 8.3 ± 0.41 | 9 | 0.32 ± 0.14 |
| 3 | −27 ± 2.0 | 52 ± 2.2 | 56 ± 1.1 | 91 | 9.3 ± 0.49 | 9 | 0.20 ± 0.05 |
| 4 | −16 ± 0.50 | 60 ± 8.4 | 55 ± 3.5 | 91 | 9.0 ± 0.97 | 9 | 0.17 ± 0.03 |
| 5 | −15 ± 0.46 | 250 ± 56 | 61 ± 10 | 91 | 11 ± 4.1 | 9 | 0.32 ± 0.05 |
| 7 | −17 ± 1.0 | 120 ± 24 | 98 ± 4.7 | 89 | 15 ± 6.9 | 11 | 0.22 ± 0.03 |