OBJECTIVES: Emergency medical services (EMS) providers deliver the initial care for millions of people in the United States each year. The Institute of Medicine noted a deficit in research necessary to improve prehospital care, created by the existence of data silos, absence of long-term outcomes, and limited stakeholder engagement in research. This article describes a regional effort to create a high-performing infrastructure in southwestern Pennsylvania addressing these fundamental barriers. METHODS: Regional EMS records from 33 agencies in January 2011 were linked to hospital-based electronic health records (EHRs) in a single nine-hospital system, with manual review of matches for accuracy. The use of community stakeholder engagement was included to guide scientific inquiry, as well as 2-year follow up for patient-centered outcomes. RESULTS: Local EMS medicine stakeholders emphasized the limits of single-agency EMS research and suggested that studies focus on improving cross-cutting, long-term outcomes. Guided by this input, more than 95% of EMS records (2,675 of 2,800) were linked to hospital-based EHRs. More than 80% of records were linked to 2-year mortality, with more deaths among EMS patients with prehospital hypotension (30.5%) or respiratory distress (19.5%) than chest pain (5.4%) or nonspecific complaints (9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: A prehospital comparative effectiveness research infrastructure composed of patient-level EMS data, EHRs at multiple hospitals, long-term outcomes, and community stakeholder perspectives is feasible and may be scalable to larger regions and networks. The lessons learned and barriers identified offer a roadmap to answering community and policy-relevant research questions in prehospital care.
OBJECTIVES: Emergency medical services (EMS) providers deliver the initial care for millions of people in the United States each year. The Institute of Medicine noted a deficit in research necessary to improve prehospital care, created by the existence of data silos, absence of long-term outcomes, and limited stakeholder engagement in research. This article describes a regional effort to create a high-performing infrastructure in southwestern Pennsylvania addressing these fundamental barriers. METHODS: Regional EMS records from 33 agencies in January 2011 were linked to hospital-based electronic health records (EHRs) in a single nine-hospital system, with manual review of matches for accuracy. The use of community stakeholder engagement was included to guide scientific inquiry, as well as 2-year follow up for patient-centered outcomes. RESULTS: Local EMS medicine stakeholders emphasized the limits of single-agency EMS research and suggested that studies focus on improving cross-cutting, long-term outcomes. Guided by this input, more than 95% of EMS records (2,675 of 2,800) were linked to hospital-based EHRs. More than 80% of records were linked to 2-year mortality, with more deaths among EMS patients with prehospital hypotension (30.5%) or respiratory distress (19.5%) than chest pain (5.4%) or nonspecific complaints (9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: A prehospital comparative effectiveness research infrastructure composed of patient-level EMS data, EHRs at multiple hospitals, long-term outcomes, and community stakeholder perspectives is feasible and may be scalable to larger regions and networks. The lessons learned and barriers identified offer a roadmap to answering community and policy-relevant research questions in prehospital care.
Authors: Ian G Stiell; George A Wells; Brian Field; Daniel W Spaite; Lisa P Nesbitt; Valerie J De Maio; Graham Nichol; Donna Cousineau; Josée Blackburn; Doug Munkley; Lorraine Luinstra-Toohey; Tony Campeau; Eugene Dagnone; Marion Lyver Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian G Stiell; Daniel W Spaite; Brian Field; Lisa P Nesbitt; Doug Munkley; Justin Maloney; Jon Dreyer; Lorraine Luinstra Toohey; Tony Campeau; Eugene Dagnone; Marion Lyver; George A Wells Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T R Delbridge; B Bailey; J L Chew; A K Conn; J J Krakeel; D Manz; D R Miller; P J O'Malley; S D Ryan; D W Spaite; R D Stewart; R E Suter; E M Wilson Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Alan E Jones; Ian G Stiell; Lisa P Nesbitt; Daniel W Spaite; Nael Hasan; Brian A Watts; Jeffrey A Kline Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Christopher W Seymour; Jeremy M Kahn; Christian Martin-Gill; Clifton W Callaway; Donald M Yealy; Damon Scales; Derek C Angus Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Daniel R Kievlan; Christian Martin-Gill; Jeremy M Kahn; Clifton W Callaway; Donald M Yealy; Derek C Angus; Christopher W Seymour Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Chen Ji; Tom Quinn; Lucia Gavalova; Ranjit Lall; Charlotte Scomparin; Jessica Horton; Charles D Deakin; Helen Pocock; Michael A Smyth; Nigel Rees; Samantha J Brace-McDonnell; Simon Gates; Gavin D Perkins Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-07-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Kimberley M DeMerle; Jason N Kennedy; Octavia M Peck Palmer; Emily Brant; Chung-Chou H Chang; Robert P Dickson; David T Huang; Derek C Angus; Christopher W Seymour Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-02-01