Literature DB >> 24841954

Infrequent intraprocedural premature ventricular complexes: implications for ablation outcome.

Kazim Baser1, Hatice Duygu Bas, Miki Yokokawa, Rakesh Latchamsetty, Fred Morady, Frank Bogun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) can be eliminated with an ablation procedure. Ablation success rates have been reported to be in the 80% range. Reasons for failure of ablation have not been described in detail. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the paucity of PVCs at the beginning of the ablation procedure affects the outcome.
METHODS: Catheter ablation was attempted in a consecutive series of 194 patients (age: 50 ± 14 years, 91 male, ejection fraction: 56.4 ± 8.4%) with frequent idiopathic PVCs. Based on receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis, patients were divided into 2 groups: Patients with frequent PVCs (≥32 PVCs within the first 30 minutes of the procedure: n = 135 [70%]); and patients with infrequent PVCs (<32 PVCs within the first 30 minutes of the procedure: n = 59 [30%]). Procedural outcomes were compared at 3 months postablation. A successful ablation was defined as a ≥80% reduction in the PVC burden compared to baseline.
RESULTS: A successful procedure was performed in 148 patients (76%) resulting in a decrease in the PVC burden from 19.1 ± 13.6% to 0.38 ± 0.98%(P < 0.0001). Patients with frequent intraprocedural PVCs had a higher success rate than patients with infrequent intraprocedural PVCs (85% vs. 56%, P = 0.0001). Administration of sedation was no different in the 2 groups. The paucity of PVCs was independent of the site of origin in predicting procedural failure (OR: 6.9, 95% CI: 3.0-16.2 P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Paucity of PVCs at the beginning of an ablation procedure is associated with a lower ablation success rate independent of the site of origin.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infrequent PVCs; outcome; premature ventricular complexes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24841954     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

Review 1.  Anesthetic Management In Electrophysiology Laboratory: A Multidisciplinary Review.

Authors:  Mustafa Yildiz; Hulya Yilmaz Ak; Dogac Oksen; Sinan Oral
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-02-28

Review 2.  [Three-dimensional mapping : Special aspects and new features of CARTO®].

Authors:  Livio Bertagnolli; Federica Torri; Sergio Richter; Borislav Dinov; Andreas Müssigbrodt; Arash Arya; Philipp Sommer; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks; Sebastian Hilbert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-08-03

3.  Safety and efficacy in ablation of premature ventricular contraction: data from the German ablation registry.

Authors:  S Fichtner; J Senges; M Hochadel; R Tilz; S Willems; L Eckardt; T Deneke; T Lewalter; U Dorwarth; C Reithmann; J Brachmann; G Steinbeck; S Kääb
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Efficacy of advanced pace-mapping technology for idiopathic premature ventricular complexes ablation.

Authors:  J Fedida; T Strisciuglio; M Sohal; M Wolf; K Van Beeumen; A Neyrinck; P Taghji; C Lepiece; A Almorad; Y Vandekerckhove; R Tavernier; M Duytschaever; S Knecht
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Catheter ablation of idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias with low intraprocedural burden guided by pace mapping.

Authors:  Richard Bennett; Timothy Campbell; Yasuhito Kotake; Samual Turnbull; Ashwin Bhaskaran; Kasun De Silva; Geoffrey Lee; Jonathan Kalman; Saurabh Kumar
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-05-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.