Literature DB >> 24841094

Oral approach-avoidance: affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics.

Sascha Topolinski1, Ira Theresa Maschmann2, Diane Pecher3, Piotr Winkielman4.   

Abstract

Can mouth movements shape attitudes? When people articulate different consonants (e.g., B or K) they press the tongue and the lips against various spots in the mouth. This allows for construction of words that feature systematic wanderings of consonantal stricture spots either from the front to the rear (inward; e.g., BENOKA) or from the rear to the front (outward; e.g., KENOBA) of the mouth. These wanderings of muscular strictures resemble the oral kinematics during either deglution (swallowing-like, inward movement) or expectoration (spitting-like, outward movement). Thus, we predicted that the articulation of inward and outward words induces motivational states associated with deglutition and expectoration--namely, approach and avoidance--which was tested in 9 experiments (total N = 822). Inward words were preferred over outward words, being labeled as nonsense words (Experiments 1, 4, 5, 6, and 9), company names (Experiment 2), or person names (Experiments 3, 7, and 8), with control words falling in between (Experiment 5). As a social-behavioral consequence, ostensible chat partners were more often chosen to interact with when having inward compared to outward names (Experiment 7). The effect was found in German-speaking (Experiments 1-5) and English-speaking (Experiment 6) samples, and it occurred even under silent reading (all experiments) and for negatively labeled targets (names of villains; Experiment 8). Showing articulation simulations as being the causal undercurrent, this effect was absent in aphasia patients who lacked covert subvocalizations (Experiment 9).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24841094     DOI: 10.1037/a0036477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  13 in total

1.  The in-out effect: examining the role of perceptual fluency in the preference for words with inward-wandering consonantal articulation.

Authors:  Sandra Godinho; Margarida V Garrido
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-10

Review 2.  Abstract concepts, language and sociality: from acquisition to inner speech.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Laura Barca; Ferdinand Binkofski; Luca Tummolini
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Exploring the temporal boundary conditions of the articulatory in-out preference effect.

Authors:  Judith Gerten; Sascha Topolinski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-19

4.  Hitting is male, giving is female: automatic imitation and complementarity during action observation.

Authors:  Luisa Lugli; Anna Chiara Obertis; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-23

5.  On the emergence of the in-out effect across trials: two items do the trick.

Authors:  Sascha Topolinski; Lea Boecker; Charlotte S Löffler; Beatriz Gusmão; Moritz Ingendahl
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  What's in a Name? Sound Symbolism and Gender in First Names.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  What's in and what's out in branding? A novel articulation effect for brand names.

Authors:  Sascha Topolinski; Michael Zürn; Iris K Schneider
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-13

8.  Grounding Abstractness: Abstract Concepts and the Activation of the Mouth.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Edoardo Zarcone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-10

9.  Effects of Imagined Consumption and Simulated Eating Movements on Food Intake: Thoughts about Food Are Not Always of Advantage.

Authors:  Simona Haasova; Botond Elekes; Benjamin Missbach; Arnd Florack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-28

10.  Corrugator activity confirms immediate negative affect in surprise.

Authors:  Sascha Topolinski; Fritz Strack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.