Literature DB >> 24839709

The state-of-the-art of ART restorations.

Jo E Frencken.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: ART is less anxiety- and pain-provoking than traditional restorative treatments; administration of local anaesthesia is rarely required. Systematic reviews have provided evidence of the high level of effectiveness of high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restoration in restoring single-surface cavities, both in primary and permanent posterior teeth, but its survival rates in restoring multiple-surface cavities in primary posterior teeth needs to be improved. Insufficient information is available regarding the survival rates of multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth. Evidence from these reviews indicates no difference in the survival rates of single-surface high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations and amalgam restorations in primary and permanent posterior teeth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Where indicated, high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations can be used alongside traditional restorations. ART provides a much more acceptable introduction to dental restorative care than the traditional 'injection, drill and fill'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24839709     DOI: 10.12968/denu.2014.41.3.218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Update        ISSN: 0305-5000


  6 in total

Review 1.  Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.

Authors:  Nicola P T Innes; David Ricketts; Lee Yee Chong; Alexander J Keightley; Thomas Lamont; Ruth M Santamaria
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-31

2.  The Hall Technique 10 years on: Questions and answers.

Authors:  N P T Innes; D J P Evans; C C Bonifacio; M Geneser; D Hesse; M Heimer; M Kanellis; V Machiulskiene; J Narbutaité; I C Olegário; A Owais; M P Araujo; D P Raggio; C Splieth; E van Amerongen; K Weber-Gasparoni; R M Santamaria
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months.

Authors:  Rafael Menezes-Silva; S R M Velasco; R S Bastos; G Molina; H M Honório; J E Frencken; M F L Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  One-year follow-up of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment(ART) for dental caries in children undergoing oncohematological treatment: a pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Cíntia Ferreira Gonçalves; Mariana Vargas Lindemaier E Silva; Luciane Rezende Costa; Orlando Ayrton de Toledo
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nathalia Miranda Ladewig; Cíntia Saori Sahiara; Laysa Yoshioka; Isabel Cristina Olegário; Isabela Floriano; Tamara Kerber Tedesco; Fausto Medeiros Mendes; Mariana Minatel Braga; Daniela Procida Raggio
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniela Hesse; Mariana Pinheiro de Araujo; Isabel Cristina Olegário; Nicola Innes; Daniela Prócida Raggio; Clarissa Calil Bonifácio
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.