Literature DB >> 24839520

Using soxhlet ethanol extraction to produce and test plant material (essential oils) for their antimicrobial properties.

James Redfern1, Malcolm Kinninmonth1, Dariel Burdass2, Joanna Verran1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24839520      PMCID: PMC4004744          DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v15i1.656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1935-7877


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

Investigating the effects of antimicrobial products on microorganisms is a common procedure carried out in many microbiology laboratory courses, often using antibiotics or disinfectants against common bacterial species. As the issue of antimicrobial resistance continues to grow, there is a renewed interest in deriving antimicrobial products from natural compounds, particularly extracts from plant material (8). This article describes a procedure for retrieving the antimicrobial compounds (essential oils) from the plant thyme (Thymus vulgaris) and testing it against a variety of microorganisms, both Gram-negative and Gram-positive, for antimicrobial effect (4). The aim of this activity is to investigate the antimicrobial effects of plant material after extracting compounds using the relatively simple Soxhlet method (6). This article presents information ensuring the existing extraction method is achievable in the teaching laboratory, while allowing students hands-on investigative experience. As well as supporting scientific thinking, laboratory skill and competency, this activity allows students to partake in an investigation with cross-discipline approaches to the very relevant and current healthcare issue of antimicrobials.

PROCEDURE

Performing the Soxhlet method of ethanol extraction

Allowing the students to carry out this section of the investigation provides an added layer to what would be a standard microbiology assay. It takes the students from ‘start’ to ‘finish’ in terms of extracting and testing their own antimicrobial compounds. Students should set up and perform the extraction to gain first-hand experience of extraction methods. Plant material can be fresh (for example, a plant leaf) or dried. It needs to be crushed, using a pestle and mortar, to provide a greater surface area. The plant material should be sufficient to fill the porous cellulose thimble (in our experiments we use an average of 14 g of thyme in a 25- x 80-mm thimble). All equipment should be provided for students to assemble. Allowing students to build the extraction apparatus may give them a greater appreciation for the process of extraction, as opposed to testing an antimicrobial compound out of a purchased bottle. The students should begin by building a rig using stands and clamps to support the extraction apparatus. Following this, the solvent (250 ml of ethanol) is added to a round bottom flask, which is attached to a Soxhlet extractor and condenser (Fig. 1) on an isomantle. The crushed plant material is loaded into the thimble, which is placed inside the Soxhlet extractor. The side arm is lagged with glass wool. The solvent is heated using the isomantle and will begin to evaporate, moving through the apparatus to the condenser. The condensate then drips into the reservoir containing the thimble. Once the level of solvent reaches the siphon it pours back into the flask and the cycle begins again. The process should run for a total of 16 hours. Once the student has set up the extraction it can be left to run without direct supervision. It is not advised to leave the equipment completely alone due to the mix of running water and an electrical appliance, so a technician or other lab user should be made aware. The equipment can be turned on and off when overnight running is not permitted, and the time split over a number of days. For good practice, a control should be added. This could be plant material that has no known antimicrobial effect (for example, a carrier oil such as sunflower oil) at the testing stage.
FIGURE 1.

Diagram of Soxhlet extraction equipment.

Diagram of Soxhlet extraction equipment. Once the process has finished, the ethanol should be evaporated using a rotary evaporator, leaving a small yield of extracted plant material (about 2 to 3 ml) in the glass bottom flask.

Testing the extract for antimicrobial effect

Antimicrobial properties of the plant extract should be performed using the agar disc diffusion technique using antibiotic assay discs (1). It is suggested students test against a Gram-positive microorganism (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus) and a Gram-negative microorganism (e.g. Escherichia coli). Plates should be incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours. The activity can be modified to meet your curriculum requirements. Examples of a modification can be found in Appendix 1.

Safety issues

The Soxhlet extraction process heats the solvent (ethanol) to boiling temperature (>78°C). The evaporated ethanol is contained within the apparatus by the condenser unit; however the apparatus should be placed under a fume hood in case of escape. Due to the continuous running of water and a heat source, it is not advisable to leave the apparatus unattended overnight. Personal protective equipment, including gloves, should be used when handling the plant extract, as it may be an irritant to the skin (7).

CONCLUSION

If an antimicrobial compound has been successfully extracted, a clear zone (no growth) around the test substance is observed. This is known as the ‘zone of inhibition’ (ZoI). Comparisons can be made between different test organisms (3), plant extracts, and other variables (described below). In our lab, average ZoI for the essential oil extracted from dried thyme is 9 mm diameter when tested against E. coli and 16 mm diameter when tested against S. aureus (Fig. 2).
FIGURE 2.

An example of zones of inhibition produced from extracted thyme plant material after 16 hours ethanol Soxhlet extraction on test organisms S. aureus (left) and E. coli (right).

An example of zones of inhibition produced from extracted thyme plant material after 16 hours ethanol Soxhlet extraction on test organisms S. aureus (left) and E. coli (right). Appendix 1: Potential modifications to the activity
  4 in total

1.  Analysis of flavor and fragrance compounds using supercritical fluid extraction coupled with gas chromatography.

Authors:  S B Hawthorne; M S Krieger; D J Miller
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts.

Authors:  K A Hammer; C F Carson; T V Riley
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 3.  Biological activities of lavender essential oil.

Authors:  H M A Cavanagh; J M Wilkinson
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.878

4.  Antibacterial activity in vitro of Thymus capitatus from Jordan.

Authors:  Haitham N Qaralleh; Muayad M Abboud; Khaled M Khleifat; Khaled A Tarawneh; Osama Y Althunibat
Journal:  Pak J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.684

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Therapecutic efficacy of the leaf extract of Croton joufra Roxb. against experimental cestodiasis in rats.

Authors:  Shyamalima Gogoi; Arun K Yadav
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2016-08-16

2.  Growth-disrupting Murraya koenigii leaf extracts on Anopheles gambiae larvae and identification of associated candidate bioactive constituents.

Authors:  Clarence Maikuri Mang'era; Ahmed Hassanali; Fathiya M Khamis; Martin K Rono; Wilber Lwande; Charles Mbogo; Paul O Mireji
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.112

3.  In vitro anthelmintic activity of Dennettia tripetala G. Baker (Annonaceae) Fruits against Haemonchus contortus.

Authors:  Rachel A Nwosu; Mohammed M Suleiman; Hussaina J Makun; Matthew P Ameh; Manji A Shetshak; Isaac O Akefe
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2021-08-17

4.  Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of the Althaea officinalis L. leaf extract and its wound healing potency in the rat model of excision wound creation.

Authors:  Maryam Rezaei; Zeynab Dadgar; Ali Noori-Zadeh; Seyed Alireza Mesbah-Namin; Iraj Pakzad; Elham Davodian
Journal:  Avicenna J Phytomed       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

5.  Di-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate-Induced Hippocampus-Derived Neural Stem Cells Proliferation.

Authors:  Alireza Abdanipour; Ali Noori-Zadeh; Seyed Alireza Mesbah-Namin; Salar Bakhtiyari; Reza Nejatbakhsh; Iraj Jafari Anarkooli
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Exploring the ethnomycological potential of Lentinus squarrosulus Mont. through GC-MS and chemoinformatics tools.

Authors:  Reena Roy D; Shivananda Kandagalla; Krishnappa M
Journal:  Mycology       Date:  2019-12-27

7.  Induction of Apoptosis, Autophagy and Ferroptosis by Thymus vulgaris and Arctium lappa Extract in Leukemia and Multiple Myeloma Cell Lines.

Authors:  Aveen N Adham; Mohamed Elamir F Hegazy; Alaadin M Naqishbandi; Thomas Efferth
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Vitis Vinifera Leaf Extract Protects Against Glutamate-Induced Oxidative Toxicity in HT22 Hippocampal Neuronal Cells and Increases Stress Resistance Properties in Caenorhabditis Elegans.

Authors:  Chatrawee Duangjan; Panthakarn Rangsinth; Shaoxiong Zhang; Xiaojie Gu; Michael Wink; Tewin Tencomnao
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-06-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.