Literature DB >> 24839394

Modeling cell elongation during germ band retraction: cell autonomy versus applied anisotropic stress.

Holley E Lynch1, Jim Veldhuis2, G Wayne Brodland2, M Shane Hutson3.   

Abstract

The morphogenetic process of germ band retraction in Drosophila embryos involves coordinated movements of two epithelial tissues - germ band and amnioserosa. The germ band shortens along its rostral-caudal or head-to-tail axis, widens along its perpendicular dorsal-ventral axis, and uncurls from an initial 'U' shape. The amnioserosa mechanically assists this process by pulling on the crook of the U-shaped germ band. The amnioserosa may also provide biochemical signals that drive germ band cells to change shape in a mechanically autonomous fashion. Here, we use a finite-element model to investigate how these two contributions reshape the germ band. We do so by modeling the response to laser-induced wounds in each of the germ band's spatially distinct segments (T1-T3, A1-A9) during the middle of retraction when segments T1-A3 form the ventral arm of the 'U', A4-A7 form its crook, and A8-A9 complete the dorsal arm. We explore these responses under a range of externally applied stresses and internal anisotropy of cell edge tensions - akin to a planar cell polarity that can drive elongation of cells in a direction parallel to the minimum edge tension - and identify regions of parameter space (edge-tension anisotropy versus stress anisotropy) that best match previous experiments for each germ band segment. All but three germ band segments are best fit when the applied stress anisotropy and the edge-tension anisotropy work against one another - i.e., when the isolated effects would elongate cells in perpendicular directions. Segments in the crook of the germ band (A4-A7) have cells that elongate in the direction of maximum external stress, i.e., external stress anisotropy is dominant. In most other segments, the dominant factor is internal edge-tension anisotropy. These results are consistent with models in which the amnioserosa pulls on the crook of the germ band to mechanically assist retraction. In addition, they suggest a mechanical cue for edge-tension anisotropy whereby cells do not globally orient their internal elongation axis towards the amnioserosa, but instead orient this axis perpendicular to the local principal stress direction.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24839394      PMCID: PMC4020184          DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/5/055003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New J Phys        ISSN: 1367-2630            Impact factor:   3.729


  16 in total

1.  Cell-level finite element studies of viscous cells in planar aggregates.

Authors:  H H Chen; G W Brodland
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Retraction of the Drosophila germ band requires cell-matrix interaction.

Authors:  Frieder Schöck; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Mechanical effects of cell anisotropy on epithelia.

Authors:  G Wayne Brodland; Colin J Wiebe
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Probing embryonic tissue mechanics with laser hole drilling.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Ma; Holley E Lynch; Peter C Scully; M Shane Hutson
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Mechanical determinants of epithelium thickness in early-stage embryos.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Chen; G Wayne Brodland
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-12-14

6.  Role of the amnioserosa in germ band retraction of the Drosophila melanogaster embryo.

Authors:  M L Lamka; H D Lipshitz
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Combining laser microsurgery and finite element modeling to assess cell-level epithelial mechanics.

Authors:  M Shane Hutson; J Veldhuis; Xiaoyan Ma; Holley E Lynch; P Graham Cranston; G Wayne Brodland
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  A group of genes required for maintenance of the amnioserosa tissue in Drosophila.

Authors:  L H Frank; C Rushlow
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Control of germ-band retraction in Drosophila by the zinc-finger protein HINDSIGHT.

Authors:  M L Yip; M L Lamka; H D Lipshitz
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Endocytic and recycling endosomes modulate cell shape changes and tissue behaviour during morphogenesis in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ana Margarida Mateus; Nicole Gorfinkiel; Sabine Schamberg; Alfonso Martinez Arias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Elongated Cells Drive Morphogenesis in a Surface-Wrapped Finite-Element Model of Germband Retraction.

Authors:  W Tyler McCleery; Jim Veldhuis; Monica E Bennett; Holley E Lynch; Xiaoyan Ma; G Wayne Brodland; M Shane Hutson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Mechanocellular models of epithelial morphogenesis.

Authors:  Alexander G Fletcher; Fergus Cooper; Ruth E Baker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Fibrous nonlinear elasticity enables positive mechanical feedback between cells and ECMs.

Authors:  Matthew S Hall; Farid Alisafaei; Ehsan Ban; Xinzeng Feng; Chung-Yuen Hui; Vivek B Shenoy; Mingming Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pathway to a phenocopy: Heat stress effects in early embryogenesis.

Authors:  Sarah M Crews; W Tyler McCleery; M Shane Hutson
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.780

5.  Patterning of wound-induced intercellular Ca(2+) flashes in a developing epithelium.

Authors:  Cody Narciso; Qinfeng Wu; Pavel Brodskiy; George Garston; Ruth Baker; Alexander Fletcher; Jeremiah Zartman
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.583

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.