Literature DB >> 24838485

Applicability of enhanced recovery program for advanced liver surgery.

Takeshi Takamoto1, Takuya Hashimoto, Kazuto Inoue, Daisuke Nagashima, Yoshikazu Maruyama, Yusuke Mitsuka, Osamu Aramaki, Masatoshi Makuuchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) have been developed in various surgical fields and have been shown to accelerate postoperative recovery without increasing the incidence of adverse events. Whether ERP can be safely applied to patients undergoing complex liver surgery with a risk of liver failure remains unclear.
METHODS: We created an ERP by rearranging our conventional postoperative treatments and applied this program to patients undergoing major hepatectomy between 2008 and 2013. The ERP elements included greater perioperative education, individualized postoperative fluid therapy, and early mobilization. The success of the ERP was evaluated on postoperative day (POD) 6 based on the criterion of independence from continuous medical intervention with the exception of an abdominal drainage tube. Adherence to each item in the ERP was evaluated, and risk factors for delayed accomplishment were analyzed.
RESULTS: Altogether, 200 patients were included, and 165 patients (82.5 %) completed the ERP. Multivariate analyses showed that (1) an age of 65 years or older and (2) a red blood cell transfusion were independent risk factors for delayed accomplishment. The performance of thoracotomy or choledocojejunostomy did not significantly affect accomplishment of the ERP. Oral intake starting on POD 1 was achieved in 179 patients (89.5 %), and termination of intravenous drip infusions on POD 5 was feasible in 72.5 %.
CONCLUSIONS: An ERP for major hepatectomy was completed in more than 80 % of the patients. Earlier bowel movement can be challenged. The liquid in-out balance should be adjusted on an individual basis, rather than uniformly, especially for patients over 65 years of age or who required a red blood cell transfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838485     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2613-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  23 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial evaluating the need for routine nasogastric decompression after elective hepatic resection.

Authors:  P Pessaux; J-M Regimbeau; F Dondéro; M Plasse; J Mantz; J Belghiti
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Feasibility of randomized controlled trials in liver surgery using surgery-related mortality or morbidity as endpoint.

Authors:  M A J van den Broek; R M van Dam; M Malagó; C H C Dejong; G J P van Breukelen; S W M Olde Damink
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Effect of hypoventilation on bleeding during hepatic resection: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Tadatoshi Takayama; Ryo Orii; Keiji Sano; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Hiroshi Imamura; Keiichi Kubota; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-03

5.  Fast track liver resection: the effect of a comprehensive care package and analgesia with single dose intrathecal morphine with gabapentin or continuous epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Jonathan B Koea; Yatin Young; Kerry Gunn
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2009-12-15

Review 6.  Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  P Reissman; T A Teoh; S M Cohen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection.

Authors:  Y Fong; M F Brennan; K Brown; N Heffernan; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamura; Yasuji Seyama; Norihiro Kokudo; Atsushi Maema; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Keiji Sano; Tadatoshi Takayama; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11

9.  Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Chi-Leung Liu; Sheung-Tat Fan; Chung-Mau Lo; Yik Wong; Irene Oi-Lin Ng; Chi-Ming Lam; Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection.

Authors:  C Jones; L Kelliher; M Dickinson; A Riga; T Worthington; M J Scott; T Vandrevala; C H Fry; N Karanjia; N Quiney
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  13 in total

1.  Determining the Safety and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Major Oncologic Surgery: An Institutional NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca K Marcus; Heather A Lillemoe; David C Rice; Gabriel Mena; Brian K Bednarski; Barbra B Speer; Pedro T Ramirez; Javier D Lasala; Neema Navai; Wendell H Williams; Bradford J Kim; Rachel K Voss; Vijaya N Gottumukkala; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Enhanced recovery programs in liver surgery.

Authors:  C H C Dejong; R M van Dam
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Practical Contribution of Virtual Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Takeshi Takamoto; Keiji Sano; Takuya Hashimoto; Akihiko Ichida; Kei Shimada; Yoshikazu Maruyama; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing routine hepatectomy: review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Rahul Damania; Andrei Cocieru
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

5.  Safety and feasibility of an enhanced recovery pathway after a liver resection: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Rasha Rahman; Shakeeb Khan; Davinia Bennett; James Hodson; John Isaac; Ravi Marudanayagam; Darius F Mirza; Paolo Muiesan; Keith J Roberts; Robert P Sutcliffe
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Repeat Hepatectomy After Major Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Takeshi Takamoto; Takuya Hashimoto; Akinori Miyata; Kei Shimada; Yoshikazu Maruyama; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  What Is "Enhanced Recovery," and How Can I Do It?

Authors:  Bradford J Kim; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Surgical Strategy Based on Indocyanine Green Test for Chemotherapy-Associated Liver Injury and Long-Term Outcome in Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Takeshi Takamoto; Takuya Hashimoto; Akihiko Ichida; Kei Shimada; Yoshikazu Maruyama; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Fast track program in liver resection: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emad Ali Ahmed; Roberto Montalti; Daniele Nicolini; Paolo Vincenzi; Martina Coletta; Andrea Vecchi; Federico Mocchegiani; Marco Vivarelli
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  Enhanced recovery after surgery program reduces length of hospital stay and complications in liver resection: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yiyang Zhao; Han Qin; Yang Wu; Bo Xiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.