Literature DB >> 24838282

Fetal shielding combined with state of the art CT dose reduction strategies during maternal chest CT.

Leslie C Chatterson1, David A Leswick2, Derek A Fladeland2, Megan M Hunt3, Stephen Webster3, Hyun Lim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Custom bismuth-antimony shields were previously shown to reduce fetal dose by 53% on an 8DR (detector row) CT scanner without dynamic adaptive section collimation (DASC), automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) or adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR). The purpose of this study is to compare the effective maternal and average fetal organ dose reduction both with and without bismuth-antimony shields on a 64DR CT scanner using DASC, ATCM and ASiR during maternal CTPA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom with gravid prosthesis and a bismuth-antimony shield were used. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) measured fetal radiation dose. The average fetal organ dose and effective maternal dose were determined using 100 kVp, scanning from the lung apices to the diaphragm utilizing DASC, ATCM and ASiR on a 64DR CT scanner with and without shielding in the first and third trimester. Isolated assessment of DASC was done via comparing a new 8DR scan without DASC to a similar scan on the 64DR with DASC.
RESULTS: Average third trimester unshielded fetal dose was reduced from 0.22 mGy ± 0.02 on the 8DR to 0.13 mGy ± 0.03 with the conservative 64DR protocol that included 30% ASiR, DASC and ATCM (42% reduction, P<0.01). Use of a shield further reduced average third trimester fetal dose to 0.04 mGy ± 0.01 (69% reduction, P<0.01). The average fetal organ dose reduction attributable to DASC alone was modest (6% reduction from 0.17 mGy ± 0.02 to 0.16 mGy ± 0.02, P=0.014). First trimester fetal organ dose on the 8DR protocol was 0.07 mGy ± 0.03. This was reduced to 0.05 mGy ± 0.03 on the 64DR protocol without shielding (30% reduction, P=0.009). Shields further reduced this dose to below accurately detectable levels. Effective maternal dose was reduced from 4.0 mSv on the 8DR to 2.5 mSv on the 64DR scanner using the conservative protocol (38% dose reduction).
CONCLUSION: ASiR, ATCM and DASC combined significantly reduce effective maternal and fetal organ dose during CTPA. Shields continue to be an effective means of fetal dose reduction.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASiR; ATCM; DASC; Fetal dose reduction; Maternal CTPA; Shielding; Thoracic

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838282     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

1.  Estimation of the radiation dose in pregnancy: an automated patient-specific model using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Tianwu Xie; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparing different methods for estimating radiation dose to the conceptus.

Authors:  X Lopez-Rendon; M S Walgraeve; S Woussen; A Dedulle; G Zhang; H Bosmans; F Zanca
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of CT dose to the fetus and pregnant female patient using patient-specific computational models.

Authors:  Tianwu Xie; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Alexandra Platon; Christoph D Becker; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Computed tomography pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cécile Tromeur; Liselotte M van der Pol; Pierre-Yves Le Roux; Yvonne Ende-Verhaar; Pierre-Yves Salaun; Christophe Leroyer; Francis Couturaud; Lucia J M Kroft; Menno V Huisman; Frederikus A Klok
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Folic Acid Fortification Prevents Morphological and Behavioral Consequences of X-Ray Exposure During Neurulation.

Authors:  Kai Craenen; Mieke Verslegers; Zsuzsanna Callaerts-Vegh; Livine Craeghs; Jasmine Buset; Kristof Govaerts; Mieke Neefs; Willy Gsell; Sarah Baatout; Rudi D'Hooge; Uwe Himmelreich; Lieve Moons; Mohammed Abderrafi Benotmane
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.