Spencer Bujarski1, Lara A Ray2. 1. University of California Los Angeles, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA, United States. 2. University of California Los Angeles, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA, United States; University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, United States. Electronic address: lararay@psych.ucla.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Koob's allostatic model of addiction emphasizes the transition from positive reinforcement to negative reinforcement as dependence develops. This study seeks to extend this well-established neurobiological model to humans by examining subjective response to alcohol (SR) as a biobehavioral marker of alcohol reinforcement. Specifically, this study examines (a) differential SR in heavy drinkers (HDs) vs. alcohol dependent individuals (ADs) and (b) whether HDs and ADs differ in terms of the association between SR and craving. METHODS: Data was culled from two alcohol challenge studies, totalling 91 participants (oversampled on OPRM1 Asp40 carriers). Alcohol was administered intravenously and participants completed standard measures of SR and craving at BrAC's of 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06 g/dl. SR was modeled as a multi-dimensional construct consisting of stimulation, sedation, and tension relief. RESULTS: ADs reported significantly higher sedation and craving initially and exhibited a blunted response to alcohol along escalating BrACs. ADs exhibited greater initial tension but did not differ from HDs in tension reduction across rising BrACs. Further, alcohol-induced stimulation was associated with alcohol craving to a significantly greater degree in HDs, as compared to ADs. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial evidence that HDs and ADs differ in their subjective experience of alcohol and in the association between dimensions of SR and craving for alcohol. Hypotheses derived from the allostatic model were partially supported, such that, while ADs and HDs did not differ on stimulation response, there was a relative dissociation between positive reinforcement and craving in ADs as compared to HDs.
BACKGROUND: Koob's allostatic model of addiction emphasizes the transition from positive reinforcement to negative reinforcement as dependence develops. This study seeks to extend this well-established neurobiological model to humans by examining subjective response to alcohol (SR) as a biobehavioral marker of alcohol reinforcement. Specifically, this study examines (a) differential SR in heavy drinkers (HDs) vs. alcohol dependent individuals (ADs) and (b) whether HDs and ADs differ in terms of the association between SR and craving. METHODS: Data was culled from two alcohol challenge studies, totalling 91 participants (oversampled on OPRM1Asp40 carriers). Alcohol was administered intravenously and participants completed standard measures of SR and craving at BrAC's of 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06 g/dl. SR was modeled as a multi-dimensional construct consisting of stimulation, sedation, and tension relief. RESULTS: ADs reported significantly higher sedation and craving initially and exhibited a blunted response to alcohol along escalating BrACs. ADs exhibited greater initial tension but did not differ from HDs in tension reduction across rising BrACs. Further, alcohol-induced stimulation was associated with alcohol craving to a significantly greater degree in HDs, as compared to ADs. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial evidence that HDs and ADs differ in their subjective experience of alcohol and in the association between dimensions of SR and craving for alcohol. Hypotheses derived from the allostatic model were partially supported, such that, while ADs and HDs did not differ on stimulation response, there was a relative dissociation between positive reinforcement and craving in ADs as compared to HDs.
Authors: Christina S Barr; Melanie Schwandt; Stephen G Lindell; Scott A Chen; David Goldman; Stephen J Suomi; J Dee Higley; Markus Heilig Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2007-03
Authors: G Martinotti; M Di Nicola; D Reina; S Andreoli; F Focà; A Cunniff; F Tonioni; P Bria; L Janiri Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Martin H Plawecki; Jae-Joon Han; Peter C Doerschuk; Vijay A Ramchandani; Sean J O'Connor Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Jacqueline M Otto; Ian R Gizer; Joseph D Deak; Kimberly A Fleming; Bruce D Bartholow Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Spencer Bujarski; J David Jentsch; Daniel J O Roche; Vijay A Ramchandani; Karen Miotto; Lara A Ray Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Christian S Hendershot; Jeffrey D Wardell; Nicole M Strang; Mike S D Markovich; Eric D Claus; Vijay A Ramchandani Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.157