Meghan E Morean1, William R Corbin. 1. Yale University Department of Psychology, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, United States. Meghan.Morean@Yale.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: (1) To establish the reliability and validity of a modified version of the Self-Rating of Alcohol (SRE) form. (2) To differentiate early subjective alcohol response (SR) from acquired tolerance in the prediction of drinking outcomes. METHOD: 353 undergraduates completed an online survey. SR was assessed using the SRE form and a modified SRE including items assessing global stimulant and sedative effects. The Daily Drinking Questionnaire-Revised (DDQ-R), and the Rutgers Alcohol Problems Index (RAPI) assessed alcohol use and problems, respectively. RESULTS: The revised version of the SRE showed good internal consistency and incremental validity. Early SR assessed by the modified SRE was consistently associated with use and problems. Acquired tolerance was significantly related to use and problems above and beyond early SR. CONCLUSIONS: The modified SRE incorporating stimulant and sedative responses demonstrated good psychometric properties and the potential to capture unique variability in drinking outcomes. Differentiating early SR from tolerance showed that each contributes uniquely to drinking behavior and problems. Thus, future studies would benefit from examining the unique contribution of each aspect of SR.
OBJECTIVES: (1) To establish the reliability and validity of a modified version of the Self-Rating of Alcohol (SRE) form. (2) To differentiate early subjective alcohol response (SR) from acquired tolerance in the prediction of drinking outcomes. METHOD: 353 undergraduates completed an online survey. SR was assessed using the SRE form and a modified SRE including items assessing global stimulant and sedative effects. The Daily Drinking Questionnaire-Revised (DDQ-R), and the Rutgers Alcohol Problems Index (RAPI) assessed alcohol use and problems, respectively. RESULTS: The revised version of the SRE showed good internal consistency and incremental validity. Early SR assessed by the modified SRE was consistently associated with use and problems. Acquired tolerance was significantly related to use and problems above and beyond early SR. CONCLUSIONS: The modified SRE incorporating stimulant and sedative responses demonstrated good psychometric properties and the potential to capture unique variability in drinking outcomes. Differentiating early SR from tolerance showed that each contributes uniquely to drinking behavior and problems. Thus, future studies would benefit from examining the unique contribution of each aspect of SR.
Authors: Julia D Buckner; Elizabeth M Lewis; Meredith A Terlecki; Ian P Albery; Antony C Moss Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Robert F Leeman; Elizabeth Ralevski; Diana Limoncelli; Brian Pittman; Stephanie S O'Malley; Ismene L Petrakis Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: William R Corbin; Caitlin Scott; Robert F Leeman; Lisa M Fucito; Benjamin A Toll; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 3.455