Literature DB >> 24836272

The "open letter": radiologists' reports in the era of patient web portals.

Michael A Bruno1, Jonelle M Petscavage-Thomas2, Michael J Mohr3, Sigall K Bell4, Stephen D Brown5.   

Abstract

Historically, radiologists' official written reports have functionally been proprietary communications between radiologists and referring providers. Although never secret, these reports have traditionally been archived in the medical record, with tightly controlled access. Patients rarely viewed reports directly. As patient-centered care, transparent communication, and electronic archiving have converged, however, radiologists' reports, like many other medical record components, are increasingly accessible to patients via web-based "portals." Many radiologists harbor justified anxiety about whether and how radiology reports should change in response to these portals. Direct patient access to radiology reports raises several questions, including: who are reports really for, what is their essential purpose, what content should they include or omit, what limits should be placed on their accessibility, and what ethical and legal ramifications arise from the reports' unfettered accessibility. In this paper, we outline the challenges and opportunities that arise from direct patient access to radiology reports via web-based portals, and propose an approach to optimizing radiologists' reports in an era of enhanced transparency. We conclude that, in effect, the health information web portal is a "train which has left the station"; patient portals are a nationwide reality, and transparency is now a public and professional expectation. Radiologists urgently need to consider quality implications for their report writing in order to address the challenges these developments pose, and to best harness the potential benefits for patients and providers.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records; communication; documentation/standards; patient portal; radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24836272     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  12 in total

1.  Integrating Wikipedia Articles and Images into an Information Resource for Radiology Patients.

Authors:  Teresa Martin-Carreras; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Simplified Readability Metric Drives Improvement of Radiology Reports: an Experiment on Ultrasound Reports at a Pediatric Hospital.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Claire Durkin; Yungui Huang; Brent Adler; Steve Rust; Simon Lin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluating Completeness of a Radiology Glossary Using Iterative Refinement.

Authors:  Peter Y W Chan; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Comprehensive Word-Level Classification of Screening Mammography Reports Using a Neural Network Sequence Labeling Approach.

Authors:  Ryan G Short; John Bralich; Dave Bogaty; Nicholas T Befera
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Supporting Families in Reviewing and Communicating about Radiology Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Matthew K Hong; Clayton Feustel; Meeshu Agnihotri; Max Silverman; Stephen F Simoneaux; Lauren Wilcox
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2017-05-02

6.  PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting.

Authors:  Seong Cheol Oh; Tessa S Cook; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Creating patient-centered radiology reports to empower patients undergoing prostate magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nathan Perlis; Antonio Finelli; Mike Lovas; Alejandro Berlin; Janet Papadakos; Sangeet Ghai; Vasiliki Bakas; Shabbir Alibhai; Odelia Lee; Adam Badzynski; David Wiljer; Alexis Lund; Amelia Di Meo; Joseph Cafazzo; Masoom Haider
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Detecting insertion, substitution, and deletion errors in radiology reports using neural sequence-to-sequence models.

Authors:  John Zech; Jessica Forde; Joseph J Titano; Deepak Kaji; Anthony Costa; Eric Karl Oermann
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-06

9.  Radiology Reporting in the Era of Patient-Centered Care: How Can We Improve Readability?

Authors:  Siya Patil; Joseph H Yacoub; Xue Geng; Susan M Ascher; Ross W Filice
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  ACR TI-RADS Recommendations: A Call to Contextualize Radiologists' Recommendations for Thyroid Nodules With the Clinical Scenario.

Authors:  Naykky Singh Ospina; Natalia Genere; Jenny K Hoang; Juan P Brito
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.