Literature DB >> 24835839

Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the changing nature and severity of associated complications over time.

Myung-Sik Park1, Sun-Jung Yoon2, Yong-Jin Kim2, Woo-Chul Chung3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess complications related to arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and how these complications have changed as we have gained more experience with this procedure.
METHODS: The authors reviewed 200 hips (197 patients). The average patient age was 44.64 years and the mean follow-up time was 28.2 months. All patients underwent hip arthroscopy in the supine position. Clinically, Modified Harris Hip Scores (MHHS) and patient satisfaction with outcome were used. We divided complications into 3 groups: Group 1 related to traction, group 2 related to surgical technique or implant failure, and group 3 related to outcomes.
RESULTS: Clinically, the MHHS improved from 69.96 (±6.10) to 80.45 (±7.00), and patient satisfaction with the achieved outcome increased to 8.87 (±0.76). The overall complication rate was 15% (30 of 200 hips). Group 1 consisted of 4 patients with pudendal neuropraxia and 2 patients with ankle joint pain (P = .013). Group 2 consisted of 2 patients with lateral femoral cutaneous neuropraxia, 2 patients with iatrogenic labral perforations, one patient with a labral tear, and 4 patients with femoral head scuffs. There were 4 incidents of instrument breakage. Furthermore, 3 suture anchors failed, a second-degree burn occurred in one patient, and there was incomplete reshaping in 5 hips (P = .045). Group 3 included one patient with a snapping sound and heterotopic ossification. Second-look arthroscopy was performed for 5 hips. All the complications outlined in groups 1 and 2 are related to the learning curve and have statistical significance (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Complications relating to hip arthroscopy took different forms during the early learning period, but overall complication rates decreased along the learning curve. Surgical technique-related complications such as problems with suture anchors and the reshaping of cam impingements were also considered during the later stage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24835839     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  21 in total

Review 1.  Hip arthroscopy complications regarding surgery and early postoperative care: retrospective study and review of literature.

Authors:  R Seijas; O Ares; A Sallent; X Cuscó; P Álvarez-Díaz; R Tejedor; R Cugat
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-07

Review 2.  Hip labral repair: options and outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua D Harris
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  Perineal Post Padding Technique to Improve Hip Distraction in Tall Patients.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kuhns; Brandon J Erickson; Leah R Bressler; Sara M Sarmast; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-23

4.  Hip arthroscopy learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study.

Authors:  Jakub Kautzner; Petr Zeman; Andrej Stančák; Vojtěch Havlas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Hip Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Is Low Among Graduating Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.

Authors:  Suleiman Y Sudah; Christopher R Michel; Matthew H Nasra; Robert D Faccone; David S Constantinescu; Mariano E Menendez; Ryan J Plyler
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 6.  Pudendal nerve injury is a relatively common but transient complication of hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Anthony Habib; Chloe E Haldane; Seper Ekhtiari; Darren de Sa; Nicole Simunovic; Etienne L Belzile; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Heat-Related Complications from Radiofrequency and Electrocautery Devices Used in Arthroscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Tim A C van Meel; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Jacco A C Zijl; Bauke Kooistra
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 8.  Open and Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kuhns; Rachel M Frank; Luis Pulido
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-12-02

9.  Psoas tunnel perforation-an unreported complication of hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Ryan M Degen; Eilish O'Sullivan; Ernest L Sink; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-10

Review 10.  Reporting of non-hip score outcomes following femoroacetabular impingement surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yan Sim; Nolan S Horner; Darren de Sa; Nicole Simunovic; Jon Karlsson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.