Literature DB >> 24835363

A review of the barriers to sharing in biobanking.

Flora Colledge1, Bernice Elger, Heidi C Howard.   

Abstract

Although biobanks are gaining importance as tools in the field of biomedical research, enabling investigators to access large numbers of catalogued samples and/or data, most have not reached their full potential. Numerous obstacles may prohibit the efficient sharing of, and access to their sample and data collections. In order to minimize or overcome these obstacles while meeting ethical criteria, the first step is to identify the challenges to sharing between biobanks and between biobanks and researchers, thus enabling targeted solutions to be implemented. To date, no one has specifically catalogued the full scope of the barriers to sample sharing currently identified in the literature, yet such a list is essential if these matters are to be addressed. We have reviewed the literature on biobanks in order to identify the issues mentioned as barriers to sample sharing with or without data. Our literature search identified 15 barriers, including logistical, ethical, and legal issues. In this article, we provide a description of these barriers, discuss key themes, and conclude that empirical research is required to determine the full extent of the challenges addressed in the literature.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24835363     DOI: 10.1089/bio.2013.0039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  9 in total

1.  Realizing Our Potential in Biobanking: Disease Advocacy Organizations Enliven Translational Research.

Authors:  Kelly A Edwards; Sharon F Terry; Dana Gold; Elizabeth J Horn; Mary Schwartz; Molly Stuart; Suzanne D Vernon
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Sustainability in a Hospital-Based Biobank and University-Based DNA Biorepository: Strategic Roadmaps.

Authors:  Catherine Y Seiler; Jennifer Eschbacher; Robert Bowser; Joshua LaBaer
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks.

Authors:  Michiel Verlinden; Herman Nys; Nadine Ectors; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 4.  Enhancing Reuse of Data and Biological Material in Medical Research: From FAIR to FAIR-Health.

Authors:  Petr Holub; Florian Kohlmayer; Fabian Prasser; Michaela Th Mayrhofer; Irene Schlünder; Gillian M Martin; Sara Casati; Lefteris Koumakis; Andrea Wutte; Łukasz Kozera; Dominik Strapagiel; Gabriele Anton; Gianluigi Zanetti; Osman Ugur Sezerman; Maimuna Mendy; Dalibor Valík; Marialuisa Lavitrano; Georges Dagher; Kurt Zatloukal; GertJan B van Ommen; Jan-Eric Litton
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Pediatric biobanks and parents of disabled children associations opinions on establishing children repositories in developing countries.

Authors:  Svetlana Mykolaivna Gramatiuk; Irina Yuriivna Bagmut; Michael Ivanivich Sheremet; Karine Sargsyan; Alla Mironovna Yushko; Serhii Mykolaevich Filipchenko; Vitaliy Vasilyevich Maksymyuk; Volodimir Volodimirovich Tarabanchuk; Petro Vasilyevich Moroz; Andriy Ivanovich Popovich
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  The research output of rod-cone dystrophy genetics.

Authors:  Zamzam Mrad; Mariam Ibrahim; Isabelle Audo; Christina Zeitz; Lama Jaffal; Ali Salami; Said El Shamieh
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.303

7.  Harmonizing the COVID-19 sample biobanks: Barriers and opportunities for standards, best practices and networks.

Authors:  Balwir Matharoo-Ball; Mbayame Diop; Zisis Kozlakidis
Journal:  Biosaf Health       Date:  2022-07-09

8.  Building a data sharing model for global genomic research.

Authors:  Patricia Kosseim; Edward S Dove; Carman Baggaley; Eric M Meslin; Fred H Cate; Jane Kaye; Jennifer R Harris; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Newborn dried blood spot samples in Denmark: the hidden figures of secondary use and research participation.

Authors:  Francisca Nordfalk; Claus Thorn Ekstrøm
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.246

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.