Literature DB >> 24835065

Quality assessment of biobanked nucleic acid extracts for downstream molecular analysis.

Karin Wahlberg1, Jim Huggett, Rebecca Sanders, Alexandra S Whale, Claire Bushell, Ramnath Elaswarapu, Daniel J Scott, Carole A Foy.   

Abstract

Sample quality is of major importance when conducting molecular analysis of nucleic acids, and factors such as degradation, presence of impurities, and enzymatic inhibitors may have a significant impact on the quality of data. Issues of quality assessment become more important as the increased use of biobanking means that whole blood samples are being stored for longer periods. A range of commercially available kits/methods have been specifically developed for extraction of high quality nucleic acids from a variety of clinical samples, including blood, but there is limited information on how best to quality assess the extracts to determine their fitness for purpose in specific downstream applications. In this study, we have performed nucleic acid extractions from stored blood using a number of different methods. The resulting extracts were analyzed by a panel of quantity and quality metrics including UV spectrophotometry, PicoGreen fluorescence, electrophoresis, and a PCR approach. To evaluate the relevance of different metrics, DNA samples were subsequently assessed for their performance in real time PCR and microarray experiments. Our findings demonstrate that the most suitable extraction technique and quality assessment approach depends on the required downstream analytical method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24835065     DOI: 10.1089/bio.2012.0004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  6 in total

Review 1.  Brain tumor biobanking in the precision medicine era: building a high-quality resource for translational research in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Karen Devine; Jordonna Fulop; Yingli Wolinsky; Peter Liao; Lindsay Stetson; Marta Couce; Andrew E Sloan; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2016-12-30

Review 2.  Considerations for accurate gene expression measurement by reverse transcription quantitative PCR when analysing clinical samples.

Authors:  Rebecca Sanders; Deborah J Mason; Carole A Foy; Jim F Huggett
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  High yield gold nanoparticle-based DNA isolation method for human papillomaviruses genotypes from cervical cancer tissue samples.

Authors:  Noorossadat Seyyedi; Fatemeh Farjadian; Ali Farhadi; Gholamreza Rafiei Dehbidi; Reza Ranjbaran; Farahnaz Zare; Mohammad Ali Okhovat; Negin Nikouyan; Abbas Behzad-Behbahani
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  The critical role of DNA extraction for detection of mycobacteria in tissues.

Authors:  Nicolas Radomski; Louis Kreitmann; Fiona McIntosh; Marcel A Behr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reduction of systematic bias in transcriptome data from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells for transportation and biobanking.

Authors:  Hideki Ohmomo; Tsuyoshi Hachiya; Yu Shiwa; Ryohei Furukawa; Kanako Ono; Shigeki Ito; Yoji Ishida; Mamoru Satoh; Jiro Hitomi; Kenji Sobue; Atsushi Shimizu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessing the quality of RNA isolated from human breast tissue after ambient room temperature exposure.

Authors:  Stella B Somiari; Susan Shuss; Jianfang Liu; Kimberly Mamula; Amy O'Donnell; Brenda Deyarmin; Jennifer Kane; Amber Greenawalt; Caroline Larson; Sean Rigby; Hai Hu; Craig D Shriver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.