| Literature DB >> 24834271 |
Fariba Fathi1, Fatemeh Ektefa2, Afsaneh Arefi Oskouie3, Kamran Rostami4, Mostafa Rezaei-Tavirani5, Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh6, Mohsen Tafazzoli1, Mohammad Rostami Nejad6.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study is to look for the proper methods that would be a major step towards untreated CD diagnosis and seek the metabolic biomarkers causes of CD and compare them to control group.Entities:
Keywords: Celiac disease; Metabonomics; Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Random forest
Year: 2013 PMID: 24834271 PMCID: PMC4017521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench ISSN: 2008-2258
Metabolites present in serum samples of celiac patients and control α
| Metabolite | Assignment | lH chemical shift (ppm) | CD group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lactate | βCH3 | 1.32 | ↓ |
| Valine | dCH3 | 1.03 | ↓ |
| Lipid | CH2CH2CO | 1.56 | ↓ |
α The arrows (↓) indicate decrease of metabolites levels in CD group.
Figure 1Plot of OOB error for RF classification of CD and control group
Confusion matrix for training and test set.
| Predicted | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Training set | Observed | CD class | Healthy class |
| CD class | 20 | 1 | |
| Healthy class | 2 | 19 | |
| Test set | CD class | 8 | 1 |
| Healthy class | 1 | 8 | |
The calculated error and non-error rates of the classification index and the classification performances of training and test sets
| Set | Error rate | Non-error rate | specificity | sensitivity | accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training | 0.07 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.93 |
| Test | 0.11 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.89 |