Michael J Alaia1, Omar Khatib2, Mehul Shah2, Joseph A Bosco2, Laith M Jazrawi2, Eric J Strauss2. 1. Division of Sports Medicine, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 333 East 38th Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA. mja267@nyumc.org. 2. Division of Sports Medicine, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 333 East 38th Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether screening radiographs as part of the initial workup of knee pain impacts clinical decision-making in a sports medicine practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was completed by the attending orthopaedic surgeon following the initial office visit for 499 consecutive patients presenting to the sports medicine centre with a chief complaint of knee pain. The questionnaire documented patient age, duration of symptoms, location of knee pain, associated mechanical symptoms, history of trauma within the past 2 weeks, positive findings on plain radiographs, whether magnetic resonance imaging was ordered, and whether plain radiographs impacted the management decisions for the patient. Patients were excluded if they had prior X-rays, history of malignancy, ongoing pregnancy, constitutional symptoms as well as those patients with prior knee surgery or intra-articular infections. Statistical analyses were then performed to determine which factors were more likely do correspond with diagnostic radiographs. RESULTS: Overall, initial screening radiographs did not change management in 72 % of the patients assessed in the office. The mean age of patients in whom radiographs did change management was 57.9 years compared to 37.1 years in those patients where plain radiograph did not change management (p < 0.0001). Plain radiographs had no impact on clinical management in 97.3 % of patients younger than 40. In patients whom radiographs did change management, radiographs were more likely to influence management if patients were over age forty, had pain for over 6 months, had medial or diffuse pain, or had mechanical symptoms. A basic cost analysis revealed that the cost of a clinically useful radiographic series in a patient under 40 years of age was $7,600, in contrast to $413 for a useful series in patients above the age of 40. CONCLUSION: Data from the current study support the hypothesis that for the younger patient population, routine radiographic imaging as a screening tool may be of little clinical benefit. Factors supporting obtaining screening radiographs include age greater than 40, knee pain for greater than 6 months, the presence of medial or diffuse knee pain, and the presence of mechanical symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether screening radiographs as part of the initial workup of knee pain impacts clinical decision-making in a sports medicine practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was completed by the attending orthopaedic surgeon following the initial office visit for 499 consecutive patients presenting to the sports medicine centre with a chief complaint of knee pain. The questionnaire documented patient age, duration of symptoms, location of knee pain, associated mechanical symptoms, history of trauma within the past 2 weeks, positive findings on plain radiographs, whether magnetic resonance imaging was ordered, and whether plain radiographs impacted the management decisions for the patient. Patients were excluded if they had prior X-rays, history of malignancy, ongoing pregnancy, constitutional symptoms as well as those patients with prior knee surgery or intra-articular infections. Statistical analyses were then performed to determine which factors were more likely do correspond with diagnostic radiographs. RESULTS: Overall, initial screening radiographs did not change management in 72 % of the patients assessed in the office. The mean age of patients in whom radiographs did change management was 57.9 years compared to 37.1 years in those patients where plain radiograph did not change management (p < 0.0001). Plain radiographs had no impact on clinical management in 97.3 % of patients younger than 40. In patients whom radiographs did change management, radiographs were more likely to influence management if patients were over age forty, had pain for over 6 months, had medial or diffuse pain, or had mechanical symptoms. A basic cost analysis revealed that the cost of a clinically useful radiographic series in a patient under 40 years of age was $7,600, in contrast to $413 for a useful series in patients above the age of 40. CONCLUSION: Data from the current study support the hypothesis that for the younger patient population, routine radiographic imaging as a screening tool may be of little clinical benefit. Factors supporting obtaining screening radiographs include age greater than 40, knee pain for greater than 6 months, the presence of medial or diffuse knee pain, and the presence of mechanical symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: I G Stiell; G A Wells; R H Hoag; M L Sivilotti; T F Cacciotti; P R Verbeek; K T Greenway; I McDowell; A A Cwinn; G H Greenberg; G Nichol; J A Michael Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-12-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Laith M Jazrawi; Michael J Alaia; Gregory Chang; Erin F Fitzgerald; Michael P Recht Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: I G Stiell; G H Greenberg; G A Wells; R D McKnight; A A Cwinn; T Cacciotti; I McDowell; N A Smith Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: I G Stiell; G H Greenberg; G A Wells; I McDowell; A A Cwinn; N A Smith; T F Cacciotti; M L Sivilotti Journal: JAMA Date: 1996-02-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: I G Stiell; G A Wells; I McDowell; G H Greenberg; R D McKnight; A A Cwinn; J V Quinn; A Yeats Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 1995-11 Impact factor: 3.451