Jodi L Young1,2, Suzanne J Snodgrass3, Joshua A Cleland4, Daniel I Rhon3,5,6. 1. Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, 3201 Eaton Rd, Green Bay, WI, 54311, USA. jodi.young@bellincollege.edu. 2. Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. jodi.young@bellincollege.edu. 3. Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. 4. Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 419 Boston Ave, Medford, MA, 02155, USA. 5. Center for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA. 6. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early physical therapy has been shown to decrease downstream healthcare use, costs and recurrence rates in some musculoskeletal conditions, but it has not been investigated in individuals with patellofemoral pain. The purpose was to evaluate how the use and timing of physical therapy influenced downstream healthcare use, costs, and recurrence rates. METHODS: Seventy-four thousand four hundred eight individuals aged 18 to 50 diagnosed with patellofemoral pain between 2010 and 2011 in the Military Health System were categorized based on use and timing of physical therapy (first, early, or delayed). Healthcare use, costs, and recurrence rates were compared between the groups using descriptive statistics and a binary logit regression. RESULTS: The odds for receiving downstream healthcare use (i.e. imaging, prescription medications, and injections) were lowest in those who saw a physical therapist as the initial contact provider (physical therapy first), and highest in those who had delayed physical therapy (31-90 days after patellofemoral pain diagnosis). Knee-related costs for those receiving physical therapy were lowest in the physical therapy first group ($1,136, 95% CI $1,056, $1,217) and highest in the delayed physical therapy group ($2,283, 95% CI $2,192, $2,374). Recurrence rates were lowest in the physical therapy first group (AOR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.37, 0.79) and highest in the delayed physical therapy group (AOR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.36, 2.33). CONCLUSIONS: For individuals with patellofemoral pain using physical therapy, timing is likely to influence outcomes. Healthcare use and costs and the odds of having a recurrence of knee pain were lower for patients who had physical therapy first or early compared to having delayed physical therapy.
BACKGROUND: Early physical therapy has been shown to decrease downstream healthcare use, costs and recurrence rates in some musculoskeletal conditions, but it has not been investigated in individuals with patellofemoral pain. The purpose was to evaluate how the use and timing of physical therapy influenced downstream healthcare use, costs, and recurrence rates. METHODS: Seventy-four thousand four hundred eight individuals aged 18 to 50 diagnosed with patellofemoral pain between 2010 and 2011 in the Military Health System were categorized based on use and timing of physical therapy (first, early, or delayed). Healthcare use, costs, and recurrence rates were compared between the groups using descriptive statistics and a binary logit regression. RESULTS: The odds for receiving downstream healthcare use (i.e. imaging, prescription medications, and injections) were lowest in those who saw a physical therapist as the initial contact provider (physical therapy first), and highest in those who had delayed physical therapy (31-90 days after patellofemoral pain diagnosis). Knee-related costs for those receiving physical therapy were lowest in the physical therapy first group ($1,136, 95% CI $1,056, $1,217) and highest in the delayed physical therapy group ($2,283, 95% CI $2,192, $2,374). Recurrence rates were lowest in the physical therapy first group (AOR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.37, 0.79) and highest in the delayed physical therapy group (AOR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.36, 2.33). CONCLUSIONS: For individuals with patellofemoral pain using physical therapy, timing is likely to influence outcomes. Healthcare use and costs and the odds of having a recurrence of knee pain were lower for patients who had physical therapy first or early compared to having delayed physical therapy.
Authors: Erik Witvrouw; Michael J Callaghan; Joshua J Stefanik; Brian Noehren; David M Bazett-Jones; John D Willson; Jennifer E Earl-Boehm; Irene S Davis; Christopher M Powers; Jenny McConnell; Kay M Crossley Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Heidi A Ojha; Nadia J Wyrsta; Todd E Davenport; William E Egan; Alfred C Gellhorn Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Richard W Willy; Lisa T Hoglund; Christian J Barton; Lori A Bolgla; David A Scalzitti; David S Logerstedt; Andrew D Lynch; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Christine M McDonough Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: N E Lankhorst; M van Middelkoop; K M Crossley; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; E H G Oei; B Vicenzino; N J Collins Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Kay M Crossley; Marienke van Middelkoop; Michael J Callaghan; Natalie J Collins; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Christian J Barton Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Benjamin E Smith; James Selfe; Damian Thacker; Paul Hendrick; Marcus Bateman; Fiona Moffatt; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Toby O Smith; Pip Logan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tamana Afzali; Mia Vicki Fangel; Anne Sig Vestergaard; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Lars Holger Ehlers; Martin Bach Jensen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eric I Benchimol; Liam Smeeth; Astrid Guttmann; Katie Harron; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Henrik T Sørensen; Erik von Elm; Sinéad M Langan Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 11.069