Lee M Johnston1, Carrie L Matteson, Diane T Finegood. 1. Lee M. Johnston is with the Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. Carrie L. Matteson and Diane T. Finegood are with the Chronic Disease Systems Modeling Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We demonstrate the use of a systems-based framework to assess solutions to complex health problems such as obesity. METHODS: We coded 12 documents published between 2004 and 2013 aimed at influencing obesity planning for complex systems design (9 reports from US and Canadian governmental or health authorities, 1 Cochrane review, and 2 Institute of Medicine reports). We sorted data using the intervention-level framework (ILF), a novel solutions-oriented approach to complex problems. An in-depth comparison of 3 documents provides further insight into complexity and systems design in obesity policy. RESULTS: The majority of strategies focused mainly on changing the determinants of energy imbalance (food intake and physical activity). ILF analysis brings to the surface actions aimed at higher levels of system function and points to a need for more innovative policy design. CONCLUSIONS: Although many policymakers acknowledge obesity as a complex problem, many strategies stem from the paradigm of individual choice and are limited in scope. The ILF provides a template to encourage natural systems thinking and more strategic policy design grounded in complexity science.
OBJECTIVES: We demonstrate the use of a systems-based framework to assess solutions to complex health problems such as obesity. METHODS: We coded 12 documents published between 2004 and 2013 aimed at influencing obesity planning for complex systems design (9 reports from US and Canadian governmental or health authorities, 1 Cochrane review, and 2 Institute of Medicine reports). We sorted data using the intervention-level framework (ILF), a novel solutions-oriented approach to complex problems. An in-depth comparison of 3 documents provides further insight into complexity and systems design in obesity policy. RESULTS: The majority of strategies focused mainly on changing the determinants of energy imbalance (food intake and physical activity). ILF analysis brings to the surface actions aimed at higher levels of system function and points to a need for more innovative policy design. CONCLUSIONS: Although many policymakers acknowledge obesity as a complex problem, many strategies stem from the paradigm of individual choice and are limited in scope. The ILF provides a template to encourage natural systems thinking and more strategic policy design grounded in complexity science.
Authors: Kelly D Brownell; Rogan Kersh; David S Ludwig; Robert C Post; Rebecca M Puhl; Marlene B Schwartz; Walter C Willett Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Katherine Hafekost; David Lawrence; Francis Mitrou; Therese A O'Sullivan; Stephen R Zubrick Journal: BMC Med Date: 2013-02-18 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Jessie-Lee D McIsaac; Rebecca Spencer; Melissa Stewart; Tarra Penney; Sara Brushett; Sara F L Kirk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anne Barnhill; Anne Palmer; Christine M Weston; Kelly D Brownell; Kate Clancy; Christina D Economos; Joel Gittelsohn; Ross A Hammond; Shiriki Kumanyika; Wendy L Bennett Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Sonya S Brady; Linda Brubaker; Cynthia S Fok; Sheila Gahagan; Cora E Lewis; Jessica Lewis; Jerry L Lowder; Jesse Nodora; Ann Stapleton; Mary H Palmer Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2020-01-07
Authors: Harriet Koorts; Paul M Salmon; Christopher T V Swain; Samuel Cassar; David Strickland; Jo Salmon Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 8.915