Literature DB >> 24831989

Intensified insulin-based glycaemic control after myocardial infarction: mortality during 20 year follow-up of the randomised Diabetes Mellitus Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI 1) trial.

Viveca Ritsinger1, Klas Malmberg2, Anton Mårtensson3, Lars Rydén2, Hans Wedel4, Anna Norhammar2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of intensified glycaemic control after acute myocardial infarction are uncertain. We report the 20 year follow-up results of the first Diabetes Mellitus Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI 1) trial.
METHODS: DIGAMI 1 was a prospective, randomised, open-label trial with blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE) done at coronary care units in 19 Swedish hospitals between Jan 1, 1990 and Dec 31, 1993. Patients with and without previously diagnosed diabetes and with blood glucose concentrations of more than 11 mmol/L who had had a suspected acute myocardial infarction in the previous 24 h were randomly assigned (1:1), with sealed envelopes, to intensified insulin-based glycaemic control for at least 3 months, or to a control group prescribed conventional glucose-lowering treatment. Masking was not considered feasible or safe on the basis of insulin use. The primary endpoint was mortality, in both the original study and the present follow-up analysis. Analysis was by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: 620 patients were randomised to intensified insulin-based glycaemic control (n=306) or the control group (n=314). During a mean follow-up period of 7·3 years (SD 6·6; range 0·0-21·8) years, 271 patients (89%) died in the intensified glycaemic control group and 285 (91%) patients died in the standard glycaemic control group. Median survival time was 7·0 years (IQR 1·8-12·4) in patients in the intensified glycaemic control group and 4·7 (1·0-11·4) in those in the standard group (hazard ratio 0·83, 95% CI 0·70-0·98; p=0·027). The effect of intensified glycaemic control was apparent during 8 years after randomisation, increasing survival by 2·3 years.
INTERPRETATION: Intensified insulin-based glycaemic control after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes and hyperglycaemia at admission had a long-lasting effect on longevity. Although the effect of glucose lowering might be less apparent with presently available, more effective lipid-lowering and blood-pressure-lowering drugs, improved glycaemic control might still be important for longevity after acute myocardial infarction. FUNDING: Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, Kronoberg County Council.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24831989     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70088-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol        ISSN: 2213-8587            Impact factor:   32.069


  16 in total

1.  Diabetes: Glycaemia and insulin after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Paresh Dandona; Ajay Chaudhuri
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 2.  Cardiovascular Safety of Antidiabetic Drugs in the Hospital Setting.

Authors:  Stacey A Seggelke; Mark C Lindsay; Ingrid Hazlett; Rebecca Sanagorski; Robert H Eckel; Cecilia C Low Wang
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  The Association Between Insulin Initiation and Adverse Outcomes After Hospital Discharge in Older Adults: a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zoe Lysy; Kinwah Fung; Vasily Giannakeas; Hadas D Fischer; Chaim M Bell; Lorraine L Lipscombe
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Contemporary Medical Therapies for Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease and Concomitant Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Review of Current Evidence.

Authors:  Dennis I Narcisse; Daniel R Katzenberger; J Antonio Gutierrez
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  MG53 E3 Ligase-Dead Mutant Protects Diabetic Hearts From Acute Ischemic/Reperfusion Injury and Ameliorates Diet-Induced Cardiometabolic Damage.

Authors:  Han Feng; Hao Shen; Matthew J Robeson; Yue-Han Wu; Hong-Kun Wu; Geng-Jia Chen; Shuo Zhang; Peng Xie; Li Jin; Yanyun He; Yingfan Wang; Fengxiang Lv; Xinli Hu; Yan Zhang; Rui-Ping Xiao
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Effects of Long-term Metformin and Lifestyle Interventions on Cardiovascular Events in the Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcome Study.

Authors:  Ronald B Goldberg; Trevor J Orchard; Jill P Crandall; Edward J Boyko; Matthew Budoff; Dana Dabelea; Kishore M Gadde; William C Knowler; Christine G Lee; David M Nathan; Karol Watson; Marinella Temprosa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 39.918

Review 7.  Lessons learned from cardiovascular outcome clinical trials with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.

Authors:  Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino; Giorgio Sesti
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  Cardiovascular effects of basal insulins.

Authors:  Edoardo Mannucci; Stefano Giannini; Ilaria Dicembrini
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 9.  Thrombosis and Vascular Inflammation in Diabetes: Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Nikoletta Pechlivani; Ramzi A Ajjan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-01-19

Review 10.  Continued efforts to translate diabetes cardiovascular outcome trials into clinical practice.

Authors:  Angelo Avogaro; Gian Paolo Fadini; Giorgio Sesti; Enzo Bonora; Stefano Del Prato
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.