Stacey A Seggelke1, Mark C Lindsay1, Ingrid Hazlett1, Rebecca Sanagorski1, Robert H Eckel1, Cecilia C Low Wang2. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, MS8106, RC-1 South, Room 7103, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, MS8106, RC-1 South, Room 7103, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Cecilia.LowWang@UCDenver.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with diabetes and/or stress hyperglycemia requires good glycemic control in the hospital setting, often requiring the use of glucose-lowering therapy. Standard-of-care dictates that non-insulin therapy be discontinued, with insulin therapy initiated using a basal-bolus approach. However, insulin is associated with a high risk for hypoglycemia and medical errors. Alternatives to insulin are needed in the inpatient setting, but the cardiovascular (CV) safety of non-insulin therapy is a concern. RECENT FINDINGS: Most studies of antidiabetic drugs have been performed in the outpatient setting, and except for insulin therapy, trials in the inpatient setting have been insufficient to establish CV safety. Randomized controlled trials support the safety of insulin with more moderate glycemic control in the hospital, when hypoglycemia is minimized. Two recent multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials support the safety of sitagliptin, a dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), in hospitalized patients, although the sample sizes were likely too small to detect CV events. Small trials suggest a possible CV benefit of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy. A paucity of evidence and presence of side effects and cautions with insulin secretagogues, sodium glucose-co-transporter-2 inhibitors, and metformin preclude their routine use in the hospital setting. Available evidence is inadequate to evaluate the CV safety of most antidiabetic drug classes in the hospital setting. However, preliminary data from randomized clinical trials suggest the potential safety of the DPP4i sitagliptin.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with diabetes and/or stress hyperglycemia requires good glycemic control in the hospital setting, often requiring the use of glucose-lowering therapy. Standard-of-care dictates that non-insulin therapy be discontinued, with insulin therapy initiated using a basal-bolus approach. However, insulin is associated with a high risk for hypoglycemia and medical errors. Alternatives to insulin are needed in the inpatient setting, but the cardiovascular (CV) safety of non-insulin therapy is a concern. RECENT FINDINGS: Most studies of antidiabetic drugs have been performed in the outpatient setting, and except for insulin therapy, trials in the inpatient setting have been insufficient to establish CV safety. Randomized controlled trials support the safety of insulin with more moderate glycemic control in the hospital, when hypoglycemia is minimized. Two recent multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials support the safety of sitagliptin, a dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), in hospitalized patients, although the sample sizes were likely too small to detect CV events. Small trials suggest a possible CV benefit of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy. A paucity of evidence and presence of side effects and cautions with insulin secretagogues, sodium glucose-co-transporter-2 inhibitors, and metformin preclude their routine use in the hospital setting. Available evidence is inadequate to evaluate the CV safety of most antidiabetic drug classes in the hospital setting. However, preliminary data from randomized clinical trials suggest the potential safety of the DPP4i sitagliptin.
Authors: Benjamin M Scirica; Deepak L Bhatt; Eugene Braunwald; P Gabriel Steg; Jaime Davidson; Boaz Hirshberg; Peter Ohman; Robert Frederich; Stephen D Wiviott; Elaine B Hoffman; Matthew A Cavender; Jacob A Udell; Nihar R Desai; Ofri Mosenzon; Darren K McGuire; Kausik K Ray; Lawrence A Leiter; Itamar Raz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William B White; George L Bakris; Richard M Bergenstal; Christopher P Cannon; William C Cushman; Penny Fleck; Simon Heller; Cyrus Mehta; Steven E Nissen; Alfonso Perez; Craig Wilson; Faiez Zannad Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: M Angelyn Bethel; Samuel S Engel; Jennifer B Green; Zhen Huang; Robert G Josse; Keith D Kaufman; Eberhard Standl; Shailaja Suryawanshi; Frans Van de Werf; Darren K McGuire; Eric D Peterson; Rury R Holman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Guillermo E Umpierrez; Dawn Smiley; Kathie Hermayer; Amna Khan; Darin E Olson; Christopher Newton; Sol Jacobs; Monica Rizzo; Limin Peng; David Reyes; Ingrid Pinzon; Maria Eugenia Fereira; Vicky Hunt; Ashwini Gore; Marcos T Toyoshima; Vivian A Fonseca Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Gabriel A Mecott; David N Herndon; Gabriela A Kulp; Natasha C Brooks; Ahmed M Al-Mousawi; Robert Kraft; Haidy G Rivero; Felicia N Williams; Ludwik K Branski; Marc G Jeschke Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Steven P Marso; Gilbert H Daniels; Kirstine Brown-Frandsen; Peter Kristensen; Johannes F E Mann; Michael A Nauck; Steven E Nissen; Stuart Pocock; Neil R Poulter; Lasse S Ravn; William M Steinberg; Mette Stockner; Bernard Zinman; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 176.079