Literature DB >> 24831849

Position paper from the IBRA Symposium on Surgery of the Head--the 2nd International Symposium for Condylar Fracture Osteosynthesis, Marseille, France 2012.

Andreas Neff1, Cyrille Chossegros2, Jean-Louis Blanc2, Pierre Champsaur3, François Cheynet2, Bernard Devauchelle4, Uwe Eckelt5, Joël Ferri6, Mário Francisco Real Gabrielli7, Laurent Guyot8, David Andrew Koppel9, Christophe Meyer10, Bert Müller11, Timo Peltomäki12, Fabrizio Spallaccia13, Arthur Varoquaux14, Astrid Wilk15, Poramate Pitak-Arnnop16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This is a position paper from the 2nd International Bone Research Association (IBRA) Symposium for Condylar Fracture Osteosynthesis 2012 was held at Marseille, succeeding the first congress in Strasbourg, France, in 2007. The goal of this IBRA symposium and this paper was to evaluate current trends and potential changes of treatment strategies for mandibular condylar fractures, which remain controversial over the past decades.
METHODS: Using a cross-sectional study design, we enrolled the consensus based on the panel of experts and participants in the IBRA Symposium 2012. The outcomes of interest were the panel and electronic votes on management of condylar base, neck and head fractures, and panel votes on endoscopic and paediatric condylar fractures. Appropriate descriptive and univariate statistics were used.
RESULTS: The consensus derived from 14 experts and 41 participant surgeons, using 12 case scenarios and 27 statements. The experts and participants had similar decision on the treatment of condylar base, neck and head fractures, as well as similar opinion on complications of condylar fracture osteosynthesis. They had a parallel agreement on using open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) as treatment of choice for condylar base and neck fractures in adults. Endoscopic approaches should be considered for selected cases, such as condylar base fractures with lateral displacement. There was also a growing tendency to perform ORIF in condylar head fractures. The experts also agreed to treat children (>12 years old) in the same way as adults and to consider open reduction in severely displaced and dislocated fractures even in younger children. Nevertheless, non-surgical treatment should be the first choice for children <6 years of age. The decision to perform surgery in children was based on factors influencing facial growth, appropriate age for ORIF, and disagreement to use resorbable materials in children.
CONCLUSIONS: The experts and participating surgeons had comparable opinion on management of condylar fractures and complications of ORIF. Compared to the first Condylar Fracture Symposium 2007 in Strasbourg, ORIF may now be considered as the gold standard for both condylar base and neck fractures with displacement and dislocation. Although ORIF in condylar head fractures in adults and condylar fractures in children with mixed dentition is highly recommended, but this recommendation requires further investigations.
Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Condylar fracture; Consensus; Osteosynthesis; Paediatric fractures; Position paper

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24831849     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  11 in total

Review 1.  Is the Mandibular Growth Affected by Internal Rigid Fixation?: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Humberto Fernández-Olarte; Andrés Gómez-Delgado; Dayan López-Dávila; Rodolfo Rangel-Perdomo; Gloria Inés Lafaurie; Leandro Chambrone
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-09-29

2.  No Significant Bone Resorption after Open Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Head Fractures in the Medium-Term.

Authors:  Michael-Tobias Neuhaus; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Anna Katharina Sander; Bernd Lethaus; Dirk Halama; Rüdiger M Zimmerer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Resistance of four fixation techniques used to treat subcondylar fractures.

Authors:  Lucas Cavalieri-Pereira; Guilherme Spagnol; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Márcio de Moraes; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-01-17

4.  Condylar Fractures: An Argument for Conservative Treatment.

Authors:  Jasper Vanpoecke; Kathia Dubron; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-11

Review 5.  Closed versus open reduction of facial fractures in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Igor Pereira; Eduardo Pellizzer; Cleidiel Lemos; Sandra Moraes; Belmiro Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-01-01

6.  Commentary to "A follow-up study on extracorporeal fixation of condylar fractures using vertical ramus osteotomy".

Authors:  Soung Min Kim; Ji Hyuck Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-08-24

7.  Evaluation of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Condyle Fracture by Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in a Hybrid Operating Room.

Authors:  Shintaro Sukegawa; Masanori Masui; Takahiro Kanno; Masayuki Miki; Hitoshi Nakamoto; Yoshihiko Furuki
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.172

8.  Mechanical Evaluation of Titanium Plates for Osteoesynthesis High Neck Condylar Fracture of Mandible.

Authors:  Rafał Zieliński; Marcin Kozakiewicz; Bartłomiej Konieczny; Michał Krasowski; Jakub Okulski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Intraoral reinsertion after extracorporeal fixation in condylar fracture.

Authors:  Soung Min Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-12-31

10.  Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs.

Authors:  Marcin Kozakiewicz; Rafał Zieliński; Bartłomiej Konieczny; Michał Krasowski; Jakub Okulski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.