Scott C Woller1, Scott M Stevens2, Daniel M Adams3, R Scott Evans4, James F Lloyd4, Gregory L Snow5, Joseph R Bledsoe6, David Z Gay7, Richard M Patten8, Valerie T Aston9, C Gregory Elliott2. 1. Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT; Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: scott.woller@imail.org. 2. Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT; Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. 3. Tufts Medical Center Department of Radiology, Boston, MA. 4. Department of Medical Informatics, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT. 5. Department of Medical Statistics, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT. 7. Department of Ophthalmology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA. 8. Intermountain Riverton Hospital, Riverton, UT. 9. Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: D-dimer levels increase with age, and research has suggested that using an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold may improve diagnostic efficiency without compromising safety. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of using an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold in the workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We report the outcomes of 923 patients aged > 50 years presenting to our ED with suspected PE, a calculated Revised Geneva Score (RGS), and a D-dimer test. All patients underwent CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). We compared the false-negative rate for PE of a conventional D-dimer threshold with an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold and report the proportion of patients for whom an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold would obviate the need for CTPA. RESULTS: Among 104 patients with a negative conventional D-dimer test result and an RGS ≤ 10, no PE was observed within 90 days (false-negative rate, 0%; 95% CI, 0%-2.8%). Among 273 patients with a negative age-adjusted D-dimer result and an RGS ≤ 10, four PEs were observed within 90 days (false-negative rate, 1.5%; 95% CI, 0.4%-3.7%). We observed an 18.3% (95% CI, 15.9%-21.0%) absolute reduction in the proportion of patients aged > 50 years who would merit CTPA by using an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold compared with a conventional D-dimer threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold reduces imaging among patients aged > 50 years with an RGS ≤ 10. Although the adoption of an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold is probably safe, the CIs surrounding the additional 1.5% of PEs missed necessitate prospective study before this practice can be adopted into routine clinical care.
BACKGROUND: D-dimer levels increase with age, and research has suggested that using an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold may improve diagnostic efficiency without compromising safety. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of using an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold in the workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We report the outcomes of 923 patients aged > 50 years presenting to our ED with suspected PE, a calculated Revised Geneva Score (RGS), and a D-dimer test. All patients underwent CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). We compared the false-negative rate for PE of a conventional D-dimer threshold with an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold and report the proportion of patients for whom an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold would obviate the need for CTPA. RESULTS: Among 104 patients with a negative conventional D-dimer test result and an RGS ≤ 10, no PE was observed within 90 days (false-negative rate, 0%; 95% CI, 0%-2.8%). Among 273 patients with a negative age-adjusted D-dimer result and an RGS ≤ 10, four PEs were observed within 90 days (false-negative rate, 1.5%; 95% CI, 0.4%-3.7%). We observed an 18.3% (95% CI, 15.9%-21.0%) absolute reduction in the proportion of patients aged > 50 years who would merit CTPA by using an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold compared with a conventional D-dimer threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold reduces imaging among patients aged > 50 years with an RGS ≤ 10. Although the adoption of an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold is probably safe, the CIs surrounding the additional 1.5% of PEs missed necessitate prospective study before this practice can be adopted into routine clinical care.
Authors: W Frank Peacock; Craig I Coleman; Phil Wells; Gregory J Fermann; Li Wang; Onur Baser; Jeff Schein; Concetta Crivera Journal: J Health Econ Outcomes Res Date: 2019-10-02
Authors: Julio Flores; Jaime García de Tena; Javier Galipienzo; Ángel García-Avello; Esteban Pérez-Rodríguez; José Ignacio Tortuero; Concepción Álvarez; Antonio Ruíz; Ignacio Arribas Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Bela Woller; Austin Daw; Valerie Aston; Jim Lloyd; Greg Snow; Scott M Stevens; Scott C Woller; Peter Jones; Joseph Bledsoe Journal: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Date: 2021 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 2.389