Siu-Fun Wong1, Mark Bounthavong2, Cham Nguyen2, Kezia Bechtoldt2, Elvin Hernandez2. 1. Siu-Fun Wong, Pharm.D., FASHP, FCSHP, is Professor and Associate Dean of Assessment and Scholarship, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, CA; at the time of writing, he was Professor, Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda, CA. Mark Bounthavong, Pharm.D., is Pharmacoeconomics Clinical Specialist, Veterans Affairs (VA) San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA. Cham Nguyen, Pharm.D., is Pharmacist Specialist, St. Joseph Hospital, Orange, CA. Kezia Bechtoldt, Pharm.d., is Resident Pharmacist, Loma Linda University Medical Center. Elvin Hernandez, D.P.H., M.P.H., MCHES, is Associate Professor, Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy. sfwong@chapman.edu. 2. Siu-Fun Wong, Pharm.D., FASHP, FCSHP, is Professor and Associate Dean of Assessment and Scholarship, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, CA; at the time of writing, he was Professor, Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda, CA. Mark Bounthavong, Pharm.D., is Pharmacoeconomics Clinical Specialist, Veterans Affairs (VA) San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA. Cham Nguyen, Pharm.D., is Pharmacist Specialist, St. Joseph Hospital, Orange, CA. Kezia Bechtoldt, Pharm.d., is Resident Pharmacist, Loma Linda University Medical Center. Elvin Hernandez, D.P.H., M.P.H., MCHES, is Associate Professor, Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Improved outcomes achieved by an oral chemotherapy management (OCM) clinic, including a reduction in the need for medication-related interventions, are reported. SUMMARY: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of an OCM clinic providing comprehensive medication therapy management (MTM) services, including education on various oral chemotherapy agents, concurrent medications, and symptom management, as well as insurance assistance. Patient demographics, self-rated depression scores, and data on concurrent medication use, types of interventions, and intervention outcomes were collected at baseline and at follow-up visits for up to three months. Thirty clinic patients (9 men and 21 women with a mean age of 64.5 years) were evaluated; the majority had advanced-stage cancer and no live-in caregiver. On average, the patients had 2.8 comorbid conditions, including hypertension (43%), chronic pain (43%), and diabetes (37%), and were taking 12.7 concurrent medications (range, 3-26). In general, OCM clinic interventions in five categories (adverse events, adherence, drug interactions, medication errors, and symptom management) decreased during the measured time periods. About 70% of OCM clinic interventions were associated with positive outcomes (i.e., complete resolution of event or improved response to therapy), with 67% and 36% of interventions resulting in potential cost avoidance and cost savings, respectively. Rates of optimal oral chemotherapy adherence and persistence were estimated at 70%. CONCLUSION: An OCM clinic with comprehensive MTM services was effective in delivering early interventions, resulting in decreased rates of adverse effects, nonadherence, drug interactions, and medication errors over time.
PURPOSE: Improved outcomes achieved by an oral chemotherapy management (OCM) clinic, including a reduction in the need for medication-related interventions, are reported. SUMMARY: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of an OCM clinic providing comprehensive medication therapy management (MTM) services, including education on various oral chemotherapy agents, concurrent medications, and symptom management, as well as insurance assistance. Patient demographics, self-rated depression scores, and data on concurrent medication use, types of interventions, and intervention outcomes were collected at baseline and at follow-up visits for up to three months. Thirty clinic patients (9 men and 21 women with a mean age of 64.5 years) were evaluated; the majority had advanced-stage cancer and no live-in caregiver. On average, the patients had 2.8 comorbid conditions, including hypertension (43%), chronic pain (43%), and diabetes (37%), and were taking 12.7 concurrent medications (range, 3-26). In general, OCM clinic interventions in five categories (adverse events, adherence, drug interactions, medication errors, and symptom management) decreased during the measured time periods. About 70% of OCM clinic interventions were associated with positive outcomes (i.e., complete resolution of event or improved response to therapy), with 67% and 36% of interventions resulting in potential cost avoidance and cost savings, respectively. Rates of optimal oral chemotherapy adherence and persistence were estimated at 70%. CONCLUSION: An OCM clinic with comprehensive MTM services was effective in delivering early interventions, resulting in decreased rates of adverse effects, nonadherence, drug interactions, and medication errors over time.
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Keith J Petrie; Annette L Stanton; Lan Ngo; Emma Finnerty; Ann H Partridge Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Almudena Ribed; Rosa María Romero-Jiménez; Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana; Irene Iglesias-Peinado; Ana Herranz-Alonso; Carlos Codina; Maria Sanjurjo-Sáez Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2015-12-29
Authors: Kapeena Sivakumaran; Pamela K Ginex; Haya Waseem; Sarah M Belcher; Sarah Lagler-Clark; Kristine B LeFebvre; Nicole Palmer; Tejanth Pasumarthi; Rebecca L Morgan Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 1.803