Literature DB >> 24830373

Effect of font size and glare on computer tasks in young and older adults.

Peiyi Ko1, Anand Mohapatra, Ian L Bailey, James Sheedy, David M Rempel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: At a fixed viewing distance (VD), reading speed increases with print size. It is not known if this holds for computer tasks when postures are not constrained. Reflective glare on a monitor may reduce productivity. The effects of both may be modified by age. We evaluated effects of age, font size, and glare on performance for visually demanding text-based tasks on a computer.
METHODS: Nineteen young (18 to 35 years old) and eight older (55 to 65 years old wearing progressive lenses that correct for presbyopia) subjects participated in a study with two trial factors: font size (1.78, 2.23, and 3.56 mm) and glare (produced by bright light-emitting diode task light reflective off a matte liquid crystal display monitor). The monitor location was fixed but subjects were allowed to change their posture and move the chair. Subjects performed visual tasks that required similar visual skills to common tasks such as Internet use, data entry, or word processing.
RESULTS: Productivity, accuracy, and VD increased as font size increased. For each 1-mm increase in font size, there was a mean productivity gain of 3 correct clicks/min and an improvement in accuracy of 2%. Font size increase also led to lowered perceived task difficulty. Adding reflective glare on the monitor surface led to a reduced VD but had no effect on productivity or accuracy. With visual corrections for presbyopia, age had no effect on these relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: Productivity is improved when the font is increased from 1.78 or 2.23 to 3.56 mm for text-based computer tasks. The largest font size corresponds to a visual angle of font of 23.4 arcmin. This visual angle of font is above the high end of ISO recommendations (International Organization for Standardization, 1992, 2011). The findings may be useful for setting the font sizes for computers and for training office workers.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24830373     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  3 in total

1.  How People with Low Vision Achieve Magnification in Digital Reading.

Authors:  Christina Granquist; Yueh-Hsun Wu; Rachel Gage; Michael D Crossland; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Learning Experience Design in Health Professions Education: A Conceptual Review of Evidence for Educators.

Authors:  Joann Pan; Jessica Sheu; Lauren Massimo; Kevin R Scott; Andrew W Phillips
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  How to design font size for older adults: A systematic literature review with a mobile device.

Authors:  Guanhua Hou; Umenwaniri Anicetus; Jingwei He
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.