| Literature DB >> 24829618 |
Yun Zhao1, Ping Shu2, Youzhi Zhang3, Limin Lin2, Haihong Zhou2, Zhentian Xu2, Daqin Suo2, Anzhi Xie2, Xin Jin1.
Abstract
Hyperlipidemia and many other metabolic diseases are related to oxidative stress. Centella asiatica is a traditional Chinese medicine whose antioxidant effect in vitro has been reported. We are interested in whether it possesses this effect in vivo and hence modulates lipid metabolism. Therefore, experiments were carried out on mice and golden hamsters regarding its antioxidant and hypolipidemic effect. We observed that a fraction (CAF3) of the ethanol extract (CAE) of Centella asiatica had a cholesterol decrease of 79% and a triglyceride decrease of 95% in acute mice model, so CAF3 was further investigated in high-fat-fed hamster model. It was shown that CAF3 increased SOD and GSH-Px activities and decreased MDA level, and it also improved TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, AST, and ALT levels. L-CAT and SR-BI gene expression in hamsters were increased. Taken together, our data suggest that the CAF3 fraction of Centella asiatica has antioxidant and hypolipidemic properties.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24829618 PMCID: PMC4009232 DOI: 10.1155/2014/154295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Effect of CA extracts on serum TC and TG levels in mice.
| Groups | Dose (mg/kg d−1) | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCG | — | 2.39 ± 0.09 | 0.26 ± 0.03 |
| HCG | — | 6.61 ± 0.62## | 14.00 ± 1.67### |
| HCG + Fen | 100 | 4.07 ± 0.70* | 2.84 ± 0.68*** |
| HCG + CAE | 1500 | 2.55 ± 0.27** | 4.69 ± 2.11*** |
| HCG + CAF1 | 1000 | 4.95 ± 1.23 | 4.18 ± 1.56*** |
| HCG + CAF2 | 1000 | 6.83 ± 1.13 | 6.99 ± 0.90*** |
| HCG + CAF3 | 1000 | 1.39 ± 0.03*** | 0.65 ± 0.18*** |
Values are expressed as means ± SEM (standard error of mean) from eight animals in each group; NCG: normal control group; HCG: hyperlipidemia control groups; HCG + Fen: hyperlipidemic + fenofibrate group; HCG + CAE: crude extract group; HCG + CAF1–HCG + CAF3: hyperlipidemic + fractions group.
## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 compared to NCG.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared to HCG.
Effect of CAF3 on body weight, liver weight, and liver index in hyperlipidemic golden hamsters.
| Groups | Dose (mg/kg d−1) | Initial body weight (g) | Final body weight (g) | Liver weight (g) | Liver index (g/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCD | — | 87.00 ± 3.83 | 96.75 ± 8.97 | 3.27 ± 0.41 | 3.33 ± 0.13 |
| HFD | — | 87.14 ± 4.74 | 124.50 ± 4.635# | 7.12 ± 0.32### | 5.73 ± 0.22### |
| HFD + XZK | 250 | 87.13 ± 2.70 | 101.50 ± 4.48* | 5.76 ± 0.32* | 5.38 ± 0.10 |
| HFD + C100 | 100 | 86.25 ± 2.34 | 104.00 ± 4.04* | 5.35 ± 0.27** | 5.06 ± 0.21 |
| HFD + C250 | 250 | 85.20 ± 2.19 | 85.00 ± 5.58*** | 4.24 ± 0.32*** | 4.47 ± 0.18*** |
| HFD + C500 | 500 | 84.60 ± 2.90 | 93.75 ± 8.12* | 5.25 ± 0.53** | 5.59 ± 0.24 |
Values are expressed as means ± SEM from 8 animals each group; NCD: normal chow diet group; HFD: high-fat diet group; HFD + XZK: high-fat diet + Xuezhikang group; HFD + C100, HFD + C250, HFD + C500: high-fat diet + CAF3 (100, 250, 500 mg/kg) group, respectively.
# P < 0.05, ### P < 0.001 compared to NCD.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared to HFD.
Effect of CAF3 on serum lipid profile in hyperlipidemic golden hamsters.
| Groups | Dose (mg/kg d−1) | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | TC/HDL-C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCD | — | 1.75 ± 0.15 | 0.54 ± 0.10 | 1.16 ± 0.19 | 2.55 ± 0.25 | 1.71 ± 0.26 |
| HFD | — | 7.13 ± 1.15### | 1.52 ± 0.16### | 3.22 ± 0.28### | 9.68 ± 1.33### | 2.46 ± 0.22# |
| HFD + XZK | 250 | 4.10 ± 0.32*** | 1.04 ± 0.07* | 2.70 ± 0.17 | 5.32 ± 0.26*** | 1.66 ± 0.19* |
| HFD + C100 | 100 | 3.44 ± 0.16*** | 0.81 ± 0.08*** | 2.75 ± 0.28 | 5.96 ± 0.51*** | 1.40 ± 0.20** |
| HFD + C250 | 250 | 2.76 ± 0.18*** | 0.64 ± 0.05*** | 2.93 ± 0.15 | 3.68 ± 0.33*** | 0.91 ± 0.08*** |
| HFD + C500 | 500 | 3.69 ± 0.61*** | 1.17 ± 0.21* | 2.60 ± 0.13 | 3.04 ± 0.12*** | 1.35 ± 0.21** |
Values are expressed as means ± SEM from 8 animals each group; NCD: normal chow diet group; HFD: high-fat diet group; HFD + XZK: high-Fat diet + Xuezhikang group; HFD + C100, HFD + C250, HFD + C500: high-fat diet + CAF3 (100, 250, 500 mg/kg) group, respectively.
# P < 0.05, ### P < 0.001 compared to NCD.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared to HFD.
Effect of EPF3 on liver in hyperlipidemic golden hamsters.
| Groups | Dose (mg/kg d−1) | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | SOD (U/mgprot) | GSH-Px (U/mgprot) | MDA (nmol/mgprot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCD | — | 24.61 ± 8.81 | 17.01 ± 2.87 | 38.45 ± 5.54 | 3819 ± 305 | 0.46 ± 0.01 |
| HFD | — | 117.8 ± 29.09### | 71.36 ± 12.15### | 20.42 ± 1.41## | 2160 ± 113### | 0.62 ± 0.04### |
| HFD + XZK | 250 | 31.58 ± 5.87*** | 23.41 ± 1.78*** | 32.08 ± 1.35* | 3044 ± 122* | 0.35 ± 0.02*** |
| HFD + C100 | 100 | 21.55 ± 5.50*** | 20.09 ± 2.56*** | 27.62 ± 1.78 | 3272 ± 125* | 0.35 ± 0.01*** |
| HFD + C250 | 250 | 20.20 ± 3.15*** | 16.29 ± 1.73*** | 31.57 ± 3.26* | 3693 ± 103** | 0.40 ± 0.01*** |
| HFD + C500 | 500 | 39.64 ± 13.05*** | 27.44 ± 4.06*** | 38.15 ± 2.72** | 2610 ± 100 | 0.40 ± 0.01*** |
Values are expressed as means ± SEM from 8 animals each group; NCD: normal chow diet group; HFD: high-fat diet group; HFD + XZK: high-fat diet + Xuezhikang group; HFD + C100, HFD + C250, HFD + C500: high-fat diet + CAF3 (100, 250, 500 mg/kg) group, respectively.
## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 compared to NCD.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared to HFD.
Figure 1Histological examination detected by HE staining of golden hamsters liver frozen slices (magnification, ×100). (a) NCD; (b) HFD; (c) HFD + XZK (250 mg/kg) group; (d) HFD + C100 (100 mg/kg) group; (e) HFD + C250 (250 mg/kg) group; (f) HFD + C500 (500 mg/kg) group.
Figure 2Effect of CAF3 on LCAT and SR-BI mRNA expression levels. A comparative threshold cycle (CT) method was used for relative quantification of gene expression using GAPDH for normalization. Measurements were carried out in triplicate for each sample. Data represents the mean of at least three independent experiments. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 compared to NCD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared to HFD.
Content of AA and MA in CAE and different fractions.
| Content (w/w) | CAE | CAF1 | CAF2 | CAF3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 4.28% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 7.64% |
| MA | 3.36% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 7.68% |