Literature DB >> 24829119

A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education.

Arthur E Poropat1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personality is reliably associated with academic performance, but personality measurement in primary education can be problematic. Young children find it difficult to accurately self-rate personality, and dominant models of adult personality may be inappropriate for children. AIMS: This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the validity of the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality for statistically predicting children's academic performance. SAMPLE: Literature search identified 12 reports, with cumulative sample sizes ranging from 4,382 (19 correlations) to 5,706 (23 correlations) for correlations with Emotional Stability and Conscientiousness respectively.
METHOD: Hunter-Schmidt random-effects meta-analysis was used, and moderators were tested using sample-weighted regression.
RESULTS: When compared with self-rated measures, adult-rated Conscientiousness and Openness were more strongly correlated with academic performance, but adult-rated Agreeableness was less strongly correlated. Q-set-based assessments had lower validity, which appeared to explain moderating effects of rating source. Moderating effects were not found for age, year of education (grades 1-7), or language within which the study was conducted.
CONCLUSIONS: Conscientiousness and Openness had two of the strongest correlations with academic performance yet reported, comparable with previous meta-analytic correlations of academic performance with instructional quality, cognitive ability, and feedback. The FFM appears to be valid for educational research with children. Openness, which has no counterpart in models of children's temperament, should be further researched with children. Future research should examine the measurement of childhood personality, its relationship with intelligence, the extent to which it is malleable in primary education, and its causal relationship with academic performance.
© 2013 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24829119     DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol        ISSN: 0007-0998


  8 in total

1.  What grades and achievement tests measure.

Authors:  Lex Borghans; Bart H H Golsteyn; James J Heckman; John Eric Humphries
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genome-wide analyses for personality traits identify six genomic loci and show correlations with psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Min-Tzu Lo; David A Hinds; Joyce Y Tung; Carol Franz; Chun-Chieh Fan; Yunpeng Wang; Olav B Smeland; Andrew Schork; Dominic Holland; Karolina Kauppi; Nilotpal Sanyal; Valentina Escott-Price; Daniel J Smith; Michael O'Donovan; Hreinn Stefansson; Gyda Bjornsdottir; Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson; Kari Stefansson; Linda K McEvoy; Anders M Dale; Ole A Andreassen; Chi-Hua Chen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Beyond Competencies: Associations between Personality and School Grades Are Largely Independent of Subject-Specific and General Cognitive Competencies.

Authors:  Lena Roemer; Clemens M Lechner; Beatrice Rammstedt
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Good character at school: positive classroom behavior mediates the link between character strengths and school achievement.

Authors:  Lisa Wagner; Willibald Ruch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-15

5.  Birth by caesarean section and school performance in Swedish adolescents- a population-based study.

Authors:  Eileen A Curran; Louise C Kenny; Christina Dalman; Patricia M Kearney; John F Cryan; Timothy G Dinan; Ali S Khashan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Unraveling the Relationship Between Teacher-Assigned Grades, Student Personality, and Standardized Test Scores.

Authors:  Andrea Westphal; Miriam Vock; Julia Kretschmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-19

7.  Comparing the reliability and predictive power of child, teacher, and guardian reports of noncognitive skills.

Authors:  Shuaizhang Feng; Yujie Han; James J Heckman; Tim Kautz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  The Contribution of Personality and Intelligence Toward Cognitive Competences in Higher Education.

Authors:  Tania Cerni; Annalisa Di Benedetto; Raffaella I Rumiati
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.