Literature DB >> 24828844

Potential overuse of screening mammography and its association with access to primary care.

Alai Tan1, Yong-Fang Kuo, James S Goodwin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer screening in individuals with limited life expectancy increases the risk of diagnosis and treatment of cancer that otherwise would not have become clinically apparent.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate screening mammography use in women with limited life expectancy, its geographic variation, and association with access to primary care and mammographic resources.
METHODS: We assessed screening mammography use in 2008-2009 in 106,737 women aged 66 years or older with an estimated life expectancy of <7 years using a 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate the screening mammography utilization, by access to primary care.
RESULTS: Among women with a life expectancy of <7 years, 28.5% received screening mammography during 2008-2009. The screening rates were 34.6% versus 20.5% for women with and without an identifiable primary care physician, respectively. The screening rates were higher among women who saw >1 generalist physician and who had more visits to generalist physicians. There was substantial geographic variation across the United States, with an average rate of 39.5% in the hospital referral regions (HRRs) in the top decile of screening versus 19.5% in the HRRs in the bottom decile. The screening rates were higher among HRRs with more primary care physicians (r=0.14, P=0.02), mammography facilities (r=0.12, P=0.04), and radiologists (r=0.22, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial proportions of women with limited life expectancy receive screening mammography. Results presented sound a cautionary note that greater access to primary care and mammographic resources is also associated with higher overuse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24828844      PMCID: PMC4158454          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  39 in total

1.  Screening mammography rates by specialty of the usual care physician.

Authors:  K S Finison; C A Wellins; D E Wennberg; F L Lucas
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  1999 May-Jun

2.  Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?

Authors:  E H Wagner
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  1998 Aug-Sep

3.  Measuring the performance of screening mammography in community practice with Medicare claims data.

Authors:  Jean L Freeman; James S Goodwin; Dong Zhang; Ann B Nattinger; Daniel H Freeman
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2003

4.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials.

Authors:  Lennarth Nyström; Ingvar Andersson; Nils Bjurstam; Jan Frisell; Bo Nordenskjöld; Lars Erik Rutqvist
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-16       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis.

Authors:  Whitney M Randolph; James S Goodwin; Jonathan D Mahnken; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Predicting life expectancy for community-dwelling older adults from Medicare claims data.

Authors:  Alai Tan; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Using Medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms.

Authors:  Whitney M Randolph; Jonathan D Mahnken; James S Goodwin; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Factors Influencing Overuse of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ritu Sharma; Jean Pannikottu; Yunwen Xu; Monica Tung; Stephanie Nothelle; Allison H Oakes; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Minal Kale; Salomeh Keyhani; Benjamin R Roman; Annie Yang; Antonio P Derosa; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  New 2016 MeSH Addressing Information Gap, Poverty, Violence and Danger of Medicine Set the Tone for Policy-Makers in Patient Care.

Authors:  Marc Jamoulle
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-04-16

Review 4.  Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: The Importance of Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Sarina Schrager; Viktoriya Ovsepyan; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Mammography use among women aged 18-39 years in the United States.

Authors:  Jin Qin; Mary C White; Susan A Sabatino; Isaedmarie Febo-Vázquez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Decision-Making Regarding Mammography Screening for Older Women.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Primary Care Practitioners' Views on Incorporating Long-term Prognosis in the Care of Older Adults.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Theron L Bowman; Danelle Cayea; Craig Evan Pollack; Scott Feeser; Cynthia Boyd
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Screening Mammography Use Among Older Women Before and After the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.

Authors:  Chiang-Hua Chang; Julie P W Bynum; Tracy Onega; Carrie H Colla; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Ruth Etzioni; Abbe Herzig; James S Michaelson; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Louise C Walter; Timothy R Church; Christopher R Flowers; Samuel J LaMonte; Andrew M D Wolf; Carol DeSantis; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Kimberly Andrews; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Robert A Smith; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.