Literature DB >> 24828354

Interactive e-counselling for genetics pre-test decisions: where are we now?

P H Birch1.   

Abstract

In-person genetic counselling (GC) is the model typically used to provide patients with information regarding their genetic testing options. Current and emerging demand for genetic testing may overburden the health care system and exceed the available numbers of genetic counsellors. Furthermore, GC is not always available at times and places convenient for patients. There is little evidence that the in-person model alone is always optimal and alternatives to in-person GC have been studied in genetics and other areas of health care. This review summarizes the published evidence between 1994 and March 2014 for interactive e-learning and decisional support e-tools that could be used in pre-test GC. A total of 21 papers from 15 heterogeneous studies of interactive e-learning tools, with or without decision aids, were reviewed. Study populations, designs, and outcomes varied widely but most used an e-tool as an adjunct to conventional GC. Knowledge acquisition and decisional comfort were achieved and the e-tools were generally well-accepted by users. In a time when health care budgets are constrained and availability of GC is limited, research is needed to determine the specific circumstances in which e-tools might replace or supplement some of the functions of genetic counsellors.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision aids; decision-making; e-counselling; e-learning; e-tools genetic counselling; genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24828354     DOI: 10.1111/cge.12430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  19 in total

1.  From Campers to Counselors: a Resource for Prospective Genetic Counseling Students.

Authors:  Chana Wiesman; Esther Rose; Susan Klugman; Nicole Schreiber-Agus
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  "It gives them more options": preferences for preconception genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome in primary healthcare.

Authors:  Alison D Archibald; Chriselle L Hickerton; Samantha A Wake; Alice M Jaques; Jonathan Cohen; Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-02-03

3.  Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Genomic Counseling for Patients Receiving Personalized and Actionable Complex Disease Reports.

Authors:  Kevin Sweet; Amy C Sturm; Tara Schmidlen; Joseph McElroy; Laura Scheinfeldt; Kandamurugu Manickam; Erynn S Gordon; Shelly Hovick; J Scott Roberts; Amanda Ewart Toland; Michael Christman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Impact of a randomized controlled educational trial to improve physician practice behaviors around screening for inherited breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Bell; Haley McDermott; Tonya L Fancher; Michael J Green; Frank C Day; Michael S Wilkes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Marc Clausen; Chloe Mighton; Lindsay Carlsson; Selina Casalino; Emily Glogowski; Kasmintan Schrader; Michael Evans; Adena Scheer; Nancy Baxter; Jada G Hamilton; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Kenneth Offit; Mark Robson; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Digital health-enabled genomics: Opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Amy C Sturm; Alicia Y Zhou; Amy A Lemke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 11.043

8.  "Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Ashley N Tomlinson; Debra Skinner; Denise L Perry; Sarah R Scollon; Myra I Roche; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents' Choices Regarding Genome-Wide Sequencing.

Authors:  Patricia Birch; S Adam; N Bansback; R R Coe; J Hicklin; A Lehman; K C Li; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The role of digital tools in the delivery of genomic medicine: enhancing patient-centered care.

Authors:  Salma Shickh; Sara A Rafferty; Marc Clausen; Rita Kodida; Chloe Mighton; Seema Panchal; Justin Lorentz; Thomas Ward; Nicholas Watkins; Christine Elser; Andrea Eisen; June C Carroll; Emily Glogowski; Kasmintan A Schrader; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Raymond H Kim; David Chitayat; Cheryl Shuman; Yvonne Bombard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 8.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.